Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame


by - Staff Writer -
PFF grades were not kind to the Tiger O-line. (ACC photo)
PFF grades were not kind to the Tiger O-line. (ACC photo)

Clemson dropped its first regular-season game since 2017 in a double-OT defeat at now-No. 2 Notre Dame, 47-40. We take a deeper look into the game with the help of Pro Football Focus:

Three standouts (offense)

QB DJ Uiagalelei

Uiagalelei was among the Clemson offense's top performers for a second-straight start, where he equaled his grade from the BC win the previous week (74.6). Three of his four deep shots (20-plus yards) connected for 131 yards and a touchdown. On passes of 10-plus yards, Uiagalelei was 9-of-12 for 230 yards and two TDs. Notre Dame’s pressure did affect him when they did get to him, as the freshman connected on just two of six throws there for 38 yards, taking two sacks and throwing away two pass attempts. Comfort as a runner is something he is still working on as well, grading out at 53.1 in the run game Saturday.

LT Jackson Carman

Carman graded well for a second-straight week but earned high marks in a different area this time around. While the unit as a whole had its issues, Carman posted a 89.3 rush blocking grade, combining with a 65.8-mark as a pass blocker for an offense-best 85.2 grade in 78 snaps.

WR Cornell Powell

The senior wide receiver again delivered when his efforts were much-needed with six catches in seven targets for 161 yards and a TD.

Offense grade notes

* Clemson’s most unbalanced effort offensively (34 rushing yards/439 passing) graded the second-worst of the season (70.3; 65.8 vs. Syracuse the previous-worst).

* Uiagalelei’s passing grade was the high mark (77.1), with the aid of decent pass blocking (72.2).

* Clemson’s running ability suffered a season-low grade (56.2), with a Notre Dame defensive score also coming off of a toss backward to Travis Etienne. The run-blocking was in a familiar lane as many this season, as a sixth grade of 63.4 or lower (62.2).

* Etienne did bring in eight more catches in nine targets for 57 yards against Notre Dame. PFF rates him 10th-best nationally among all receivers (90.9) with 37 catches for 490 yards and two scores.

Three standouts (defense)

LB Jake Venables

Venables forced a key fumble into the end zone that kept Notre Dame off of the scoreboard late in the third quarter. Of starters, Venables graded the highest (71.1) with a team-high 87.4 mark against the run. As has been noted, the Tiger linebackers did struggle to get past Notre Dame’s O-line and running backs on the blitz and he did grade 57.3 on pass rush.

S Joseph Charleston

Charleston stepped in for a season-high 68 snaps and led the way in tackling (85.1 grade; 8 tackles), grading 66.2 overall.

S Nolan Turner

Turner was a busy man with five targets his way, allowing four catches but for only 33 yards. He tallied six tackles, including three stops and graded 66.9 in coverage and 65.1 on defense overall.

Defense/special teams grade notes

*Coinciding with season highs in yards (518) and points allowed, Brent Venables’ M.A.S.H. unit of a defensive group currently graded below 60 for the first time this season (58.5). That was the worst grade PFF has given a Venables defense since 2015 (57.9 in a 37-27 win over Syracuse).

* Where were they knocked the most? Pass rush (54.1), also a first trip below 60 on the season, and coverage (52.2), which was a second-straight week with struggles there (51.6 against BC).

* BT Potter has had an excellent season on field goals (10-of-14; 15th-best with 79.1 grade) and his steadiness on kickoffs has him with the nation’s highest-grade there (90.7) with an average hangtime of 4.12 seconds, 52 touchbacks and only five returns allowed for 101 yards.

Three downs

RB Travis Etienne

It was a frustrating night for the dynamic All-American candidate, who saw his lowest grade of the season (55) with particular issues in pass blocking (32.8) and his bread-and-butter with the run game (54.6). Struggling at times syncing up with the freshman QB, Etienne was contained to his lowest rushing total (28) since his freshman season (22 versus Alabama in the Sugar Bowl). He had a game-long run of only 13 yards with just two avoided tackles (averaged five per game in the first four games of the season).

Interior OL

The issues in the run game certainly tie to the interior, where they were all below a 60-grade in guards Will Putnam (58.5) and Matt Bockhorst (49.1; injured at one point and limited to 32 snaps) and center Cade Stewart (56.5). Those overall grades correlated with poor run-blocking grades as well for the trio (Stewart - 59.3; Putnam - 52.7; Bockhorst - 40.4). Bockhorst (82.1) and Putnam (76.9) were solid in pass protection, however.

CB Sheridan Jones

Jones was picked on by the Irish, with seven targets his way and four completions for 96 yards. He had a unit-low 43.7 grade in coverage.

(Grades and stats via Pro Football Focus)

Comment on this story
Print   
Send Feedback to Brandon Rink: Email | Comment
S.C. player of the year commits to Clemson
S.C. player of the year commits to Clemson
Talented instate lineman receives Clemson offer after camp stop
Talented instate lineman receives Clemson offer after camp stop
Georgia WR reportedly enters NCAA transfer portal
Georgia WR reportedly enters NCAA transfer portal
Kirk Herbstreit on 12-team CFB playoff proposal
Kirk Herbstreit on 12-team CFB playoff proposal
Post your comments!
Subject (Replies: 26) Author
spacer TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
TigerNet News
spacer The QB and the WRs/Tes get an A, RBs get a C and the OL
CM Shack
spacer Hard to grade the RBs when they never had a chance to get
Smiling Tiger®
spacer Question re the OL
TD Tigers
spacer All good questions, and I don't know the answers.
Smiling Tiger®
spacer Re: Question re the OL
slycat
spacer Oline play is more coaching and philosophy..
ClemfanWV
spacer Both Travis and Lin-J made poor decisions on returns and
CM Shack
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
Jenny1hill
spacer Dabo’s clock management = F
sbrooks®
spacer These are very reactive observations....
ClemfanWV
spacer A clock mismanagement argument can definitely be made...
BigCUFan®
spacer Just playing devils advocate...this is a drawn out post..
ClemfanWV
spacer Charleston’s late hit doesn’t allow for a passing grade***
andylayne®
spacer Re: Charleston’s late hit doesn’t allow for a passing grade***
cdj001
spacer The late hit and getting completely lost on pass protection***
BigCUFan®
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
ZeeGantt®
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
smillsap1
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
SocMan2®
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
slycat
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
1979Tigers
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
reynolds357
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
reynolds357
spacer Interior OL has been poor all season. On Defense...
clemson man7®
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
Kegman86
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
CUYankee
spacer Re: TNET: Inside Look: Grading Clemson versus Notre Dame
CUYankee

Sign Up for E-Mail News Alerts
Features
Breaking
Daily Digest