Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina


by -
Discuss on TigerBoard   Print   | TigerNetcom Facebook ClemsonTigerNet Twitter TigerNet RSS Feed
South Carolina's playmakers took advantage of mismatches created by a variety of issues Saturday.
South Carolina's playmakers took advantage of mismatches created by a variety of issues Saturday.

A tale of two sides of the football added a 12th win in as many games but plenty of questions as the No. 2 Tigers advance on in their College Football Playoff hopes.

All totaled, instate rivals Clemson and South Carolina combined for 1,344 yards and 91 points in win No. 5 in a row for Dabo Swinney's group.

This season the ‘Second Look’ features the TigerNet staff grading Clemson as a group and offering some different perspectives on the action each week. Here’s our look at game twelve as Clemson heads into the ACC Championship Game versus Pittsburgh (8 p.m./ABC).

Offense

Clemson's offense recorded an almost perfect day in Saturday's rivalry win.

Clemson’s 744 yards were the most against South Carolina in series history, surpassing the 622 yards gained by Clemson in the 2016 contest. It ranks third in a single game in Clemson history, trailing 756 against Wake Forest in 1981 and 754 against NC State in 2012.

Clemson gained 393 passing yards and 351 rushing yards and marked Clemson’s first time posting both 300 passing yards and 300 rushing yards against South Carolina in series history.

Clemson recorded a school-record three touchdown drives of 95 yards or more, scoring on drives of 95, 97 and 98 yards in the game.

Clemson recorded a season-high 38 first downs, the second-most in school history and only two shy of the school record of 40 set against South Carolina in 2016.

If it weren’t for a second-quarter fumble by freshman running back Lyn-J Dixon and a punt toward the end of the first half, it would be a perfect day.

Add in the fact that running back Travis Etienne rushed a career-high 28 times for 150 yards with two rushing touchdowns. He also pushed his season total in rushing yards to 1,307, which now sits fourth on the school's leaderboard for rushing yards in a single season. During the contest, Etienne reached 2,000 rushing yards for his career, and he scored his 18th rushing touchdown of the season, a school record.

The game was Etienne’s sixth 100-yard rushing performance of the season and the seventh of his career. Clemson now holds a 38-2 record when producing a 100-yard rusher since 2011.

Quarterback Trevor Lawrence wasn’t a slouch – he was named the national quarterback of the week by Pro Football Focus.

Lawrence posted the highest grade of any college player this week with a 94.2, connecting on 27-of-36 passes for 393 yards with a touchdown. -- David Hood

TigerNet grade: A+

Defense

For almost every bit as good the offense performed Saturday, the defense struggled mightily in a game that Tigers defensive coordinator Brent Venables said he was “embarrassed” to have his name attached to - shouldering the blame first and foremost.

Since the week two struggles at Texas A&M, Clemson had largely sewn up pass coverage woes - giving up only seven passes of 30 or more yards in its previous nine games. The Tigers surrendered four of 30-yard completions or more and six of 25-plus versus the Gamecocks.

With only big games ahead, two key questions emerge: What happened? And can Venables and company fix it? Venables’ track record and the consistently-impressive grades throughout the season suggest an easy answer to the latter query: yes.

The Gamecocks threw the kitchen sink at Clemson in terms of variety in personnel from the opening drive on. Swinney blamed alignment issues but also credited South Carolina’s execution. Tempo seemed to be a factor as well at points.

South Carolina just came to play with Jake Bentley facing eight QB pressures and still picking apart the Clemson back-levels for 510 yards and five touchdowns. He had previously had his two worst-career graded games versus the Tigers and picked Saturday to have a career-best effort. The Gamecocks were a step ahead over most of the field - up to the red zone, where Clemson continued its strong efforts this season by allowing just two scores in four trips (5th-best among Power 5 in red zone TD percentage allowed now - 44.5).

South Carolina did a fantastic job of getting mismatches for its top playmaker in Deebo Samuel. The alignment of three receivers and a lineman to the right pitted Samuel on safety K’Von Wallace - with Bentley moving around in the pocket and Samuel doing the rest for a 75-yard score:

After one half Saturday, Clemson had given up more yards (314) than it had in 15 of its previous 16 entire games, but there was some improvement in the second session. After back-to-back first downs to start out, the Tigers’ pass rush did push South Carolina back to the 50 and then forced a punt. On their next possession, 15 plays and 73 yards rendered no points as Clemson teamed up with its offensive side to go from a one-TD game at the half to a three-score lead for much of the fourth quarter.

Unfortunately for Swinney’s Tigers in some ways, I’m not sure we’ll know if the problems shown Saturday are “fixed” until postseason action. Pittsburgh can certainly try to expose the Tigers’ secondary but they rank 120th in passing offense coming in. If anything, the effort is a wakeup call if any in the group lacked focus going into the final stretch.

Clemson has had standout performances versus efficient passing attacks this season (Most notably NC State - 9th in passing offense currently and only had 193 yards with two INTs and no passing scores in October versus the Tigers). Saturday’s defensive effort is not going to bring home hardware come late December and early January, and Venables coaches a group that knows just that. -- Brandon Rink

TigerNet grade: F

Special teams

The Tigers punted just twice and averaged a pedestrian 37 yards per punt, but kept it away from dangerous return man Bryan Edwards.

Deebo Samuel was also neutralized in the kickoff return game, gaining just 37 total yards on two returns.

Clemson kicker Greg Huegel missed a field at the end of the first half that would have given the Tigers a double-digit lead heading into the locker room, and it was from just 39 yards. Huegel hasn’t had many chances this season – he is 9-of-13 – but had made four in a row prior to the miss.

Derion Kendrick was decent in the kickoff return game, and the Tigers didn’t register a punt return. -- Nikki Hood

TigerNet grade: B


Comment on this story

Send Feedback to TigerNet Staff: Email | Comment Post your comments!
Discuss on TigerBoard   Print   | TigerNetcom Facebook ClemsonTigerNet Twitter TigerNet RSS Feed
WATCH: How Bama probably reacted to title loss to Clemson
WATCH: How Bama probably reacted to title loss to Clemson
Trevor Lawrence frontrunner, two other Tigers listed on 2019 Heisman odds
Trevor Lawrence frontrunner, two other Tigers listed on 2019 Heisman odds
Trevor Lawrence wins Archie Griffin Award
Trevor Lawrence wins Archie Griffin Award
Clemson offers ACC school LB commit
Clemson offers ACC school LB commit
Post your comments!
Subject (Replies: 49) Author
spacer TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
TigerNet News
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
cofctigerincola®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
Columbiabill
spacer That's a strong accusation to make.***
ClemsonPoker489®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
7173TIGER®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
theoracletiger
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
Dugatiger®
spacer Yeah I'd go C-. They also had an INT and 3 sacks.***
ClemsonPoker489®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
TigerBill82
spacer I really think the "F" grade for the defense is too harsh...
7173TIGER®
spacer Also, the 2 PI's NOT elevate it up to at least a D Plus!***
tigeron®
spacer Re: Also, the 2 PI's NOT elevate it up to at least a D Plus!***
Rswanson
spacer I'm glad you pointed that out
Fridge_Perry®
spacer Re: I'm glad you pointed that out
Dugatiger®
spacer Re: I'm glad you pointed that out
Fridge_Perry®
spacer Re: I'm glad you pointed that out
Oldtigger57
spacer Re: I'm glad you pointed that out
Oldtigger57
spacer Re: I'm glad you pointed that out
ComeonMan
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
lhaselden
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
Tigress96
spacer F?- please
RLW7353
spacer Re: F?- please
BrandonRink®
spacer Re: F?- please
BuzzCzar®
spacer Re: F?- please
mojotiger
spacer Re: F?- please
JPF16
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
MaukaTiger®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
TigerSurvivor®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
Rswanson
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
kctigs81
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
TigerSurvivor®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
the_heckler
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
tigerbito
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
Rswanson
spacer When You Have Had Time to Think About It...
mabman2004
spacer Coot defense was F, maybe ours was C-***
TigerCook®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
FutureDoc
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
mojotiger
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
tigerbito
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
gpcarter1983
spacer No defense that completely shuts down the run grades an “F”!
apextiger®
spacer Not an F. A D+ maybe. But certainly not an F.
BengalBilly
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
dixiedon
spacer Offense was an A, Defense was much closer to C than F
vfral1
spacer Re: Offense was an A, Defense was much closer to C than F
ddclemson
spacer Sorry 600 yards given up isn't a C performance***
RC Tiger®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
baker5801®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
allorangeallthetime52®
spacer Re: TNET: Second Look: Grading Clemson versus South Carolina
Tigerluvr
spacer F would be a total failure and we would have lost. Geez!!!
Watcher®
spacer I think F is a little harsh, but i don't think i could give
TigersAndCubs
Trevor Lawrence frontrunner, two other Tigers listed on 2019 Heisman odds
Trevor Lawrence frontrunner, two other Tigers listed on 2019 Heisman odds
WATCH: How Bama probably reacted to title loss to Clemson
WATCH: How Bama probably reacted to title loss to Clemson
Complete 2019 ACC football schedule
Complete 2019 ACC football schedule
PHOTOS: 2018 National Championship vs Alabama - 1st Half (266 Photos)
PHOTOS: 2018 National Championship vs Alabama - 1st Half (266 Photos)
Clemson coaches targeting EJ Williams, former teammate of Justyn Ross
Clemson coaches targeting EJ Williams, former teammate of Justyn Ross
Trevor Lawrence wins Archie Griffin Award
Trevor Lawrence wins Archie Griffin Award
Former football great invites Clemson to celebratory lobster dinner
Former football great invites Clemson to celebratory lobster dinner
Hunter Renfrow recaps dream day in Washington, D.C. and the Oval Office
Hunter Renfrow recaps dream day in Washington, D.C. and the Oval Office
PHOTOS: 2018 National Champs visit White House
PHOTOS: 2018 National Champs visit White House
Sign Up for E-Mail News Alerts
Features
Breaking
Daily Digest