|
Replies: 10
| visibility 1
|
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43495
Joined: 12/12/12
|
TNET: Clemson's final Coaches Poll ranking released
Jan 10, 2023, 12:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2180]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2690
Joined: 8/2/06
|
My only complaint about these polls...FSU over CU?????***
1
Jan 10, 2023, 12:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [57150]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39695
Joined: 11/12/04
|
Yet they didn’t put OSU above Michigan. We saw OSU play UGA
Jan 10, 2023, 2:09 PM
|
|
We saw Michigan lose to TCU. Then we saw what UGA did to TCU.
You really think UM is better than OSU?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [593]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 729
Joined: 4/10/18
|
Re: Yet they didn’t put OSU above Michigan. We saw OSU play UGA
Jan 10, 2023, 3:03 PM
|
|
Well, they beat them...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [57150]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39695
Joined: 11/12/04
|
Re: Yet they didn’t put OSU above Michigan. We saw OSU play UGA
Jan 10, 2023, 3:08 PM
|
|
Well, we beat FSU….
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1041]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1237
Joined: 8/4/03
|
And so begins the FSU media bandwagon.***
Jan 10, 2023, 1:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [57150]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39695
Joined: 11/12/04
|
FSU is back, baby!!***
Jan 10, 2023, 2:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30460]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 47453
Joined: 12/20/99
|
The fact the TCU is above OSU invalidates everything
2
Jan 10, 2023, 2:30 PM
|
|
I’m not surprised FSU is ahead of us. We were .500 the last four games of the season. And the losses were ### whoopings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3616]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 3792
Joined: 1/21/16
|
Re: The fact the TCU is above OSU invalidates everything
Jan 10, 2023, 5:24 PM
|
|
FSU finished the season on the rise.
We didn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [169]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 175
Joined: 1/23/19
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's final Coaches Poll ranking released
2
Jan 10, 2023, 3:30 PM
|
|
In other words, the best guess of the coaches is that in 2023 Clemson will be quite good but not elite. After two less than scintillating years, good but not overall exceptional recruitments, and an unwillingness to play the portal game, that seems about right. The momentum has left the program, and we are now settling in to high double digit rankings.
We are close enough to the top to break into the single digits, but the days of Clemson being almost automatically put there pre-season are probably gone. The rankers don't care about past glories. If you are not going to use the portal, the key is recruitments, and Clemson does not figure strongly in that aspect. Kirby Smart and Nick Saban have demonstrated that an embarrassment of riches in recruiting gets you to the BCS year after year. They don't need the portal, but until we have world class recruiters (OC and DC) and more comfort with the portal/NIL landscape, we do.
I think about our 88 players on scholarship, and wonder about the contribution of players from #60 to #88 who are occupying spots that make using the portal impossible. I ask myself how our bottom 40 would do in a game playing the bottom 40 of elite teams. However you get it, last night's Georgia-TCU game showed that talent trumps just about everything else. We have enough to be quite good but not enough to be great. Until that changes, it is hard to imagine how Clemson can reemerge as elite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48334]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14922
Joined: 11/7/20
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's final Coaches Poll ranking released
Jan 10, 2023, 4:10 PM
|
|
How's wake not make it in over texas abd scar in any of the polls. They beat mizzou and scar lost to mizzou. Yeah cooters had wins against us and tenn but texas?.?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 10
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
