Re: Is it the lower taxes, less regulation, or more secure border

Its really just a vote for or against Trump innit?

ATL PAW MAN® · 2024-11-02T11:40:57.855Z

I mean, I know of absolutely no one who is all like, “that Kamala, she is so awesome! Can’t wait for her to be POTUS!” Not a one.

Lower taxes for who? It sure won't be the working class.

Less regulation on what? I'm all for less government. I'm not in favor of letting Monsanto pour PCB's into my backyard, or kill all renewable energy and set the planet on fire because, you know, Ain't No Such Thing As Climate Change and Windmills Cause Cancer, Donald Sez So.

And a secure border? The GOP had forced the Dems to cry Uncle on the toughest border bill in the last 30 years...and Donald killed it because he wanted to run on the issue. At that point I'm done listening. Good luck ever getting that again.

And while we're at it, what about health care? I think we all agree, Obamacare suxx bigly. But replace it with what exactly? (I'd love the public/private option, myself.) I'll need more than "the concepts of a plan" before you the Donald goes killing it, thanks.

"America First". Okay, sure. Absolutely. But is it in our best interests to let a nuclear-armed enemy run amok across Europe, rebuilding the Soviet Union along the way? That's the absolute fastest way back to globalism...since the threat of the Soviet Union is exactly why the US implemented the Bretton Woods system (you know, the formal name for globalism) to begin with.

I could go on for awhile. Letting the modern equivalent of an angry peasant mob with torches and pitchforks burn the village to the ground is not exactly the way to make the village better.

RememberTheDanny

Clemson Conqueror [11444]

TigerPulse: 98%

Posts: 13898

Joined: 2021

Nov 4, 2024, 7:40 AM [ in reply to Re: Is it the lower taxes, less regulation, or more secure border ]

‘Lower taxes for who?’ Waiters and waitresses (workers for whom tips are a critical part of their livelihood). Social security recipients (no taxes in social security). No taxes on overtime pay. In your world these must be the big guys.

Less regulation? Example #1: LNG terminal operating permits have been held up because of a handful of administrative errors in a few documents that gives the government an excuse to force the company to start all over again with all permitting paperwork. Then, it takes the government many months to re-review the new permits. This type of ‘regulation’ is not intended to ‘prevent companies from ‘pouring PCB’s into your backyard,; it’s intention is to utilize regulatory LawFare to ruin the ROI of investors had dared to invest in an industry that was not aligned with the Democrat’s policy objectives.

Less regulation? Example #2: Climate change and windmills. Even Elon Musk, who has made much of his fortune via EVs, cites today’s green energy alternatives to fossil fuel and nuclear power (see regulatory LawFare, above) as impractical. Instead of investing trillions of dollars in wildly inadequate solar panel power generation as represented by current technology, get the technology right before wasting the money in crap technology. As for win power, the ROI is terrible. These monsters take about as many years to install (and then decommission and remove) as they produce electrical power. Not to mention how the magnetic fields + subsurface noise that they produce distort the ‘navigation’ systems of whales and sea turtles, which has caused giant kill-offs of these creatures. Not to mention the decimation of shore birds who get killed by the wind mill rotor blades. It’s time to wake up and admit that the green energy of today is simply a crony capitalist grab that’s cloaked in the veil of Rachel Carson.

Secure border? You can’t be serious.

Health care? Replacing ACA will be a tough weaning process. Needs to be done, however. Do you know any not so well-off people who keep seeing their low-cost medical procedures being cut back or reduced? This is because the govt can’t afford to pay for them. This was entirely predictable when ACA had begun, but the temptation of ‘free candy’ had the intended effect. People now believe that they cannot extract themselves from this mission creep program to make them ever more dependent upon a govt that doesn’t really care about their well-being.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Its really just a vote for or against Trump innit?

No one voting against him knows even one of his policies.***

His only policy is he wants to be president.***

Thanks for proving my point so quickly****

Re: His only policy is he wants to be president.***

Re: His only policy is he wants to be president.***

Re: His only policy is he wants to be president.***

Re: No one voting against him knows even one of his policies.***

I am and I know all of his policies...your claim is a joke***

Is it the lower taxes, less regulation, or more secure border

Not voting against any of his policies, except for...

Re: Not voting against any of his policies, except for...

I don't believe I mentioned Harris at all...