Replies: 15
| visibility 1806
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46827
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson
3
May 27, 2024, 8:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4631]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson
4
May 27, 2024, 8:19 AM
|
|
Lol getting screwed again smh
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [63777]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 18478
Joined: 2020
|
Re: TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson
1
May 27, 2024, 8:39 AM
|
|
LSU, the pre-season #2 lsu team that's a really good team. They have a really good Friday night starter. Lsu should be the highest 2 seed of all the 2s. LSU hits a lot of homeruns too. And their field is a bit bigger than ours. Would be a tough tough draw.
If we do draw LSU, they'll probably throw Holman at us. His era is slightly higher than burns from wake, but watching him a few games this year, I think he's the better pitcher.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4631]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson
2
May 27, 2024, 9:01 AM
|
|
Absolutely....similar to Tennessee last year maybe not quite the pitching.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [63777]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 18478
Joined: 2020
|
Re: TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson
1
May 27, 2024, 9:14 AM
|
|
That Holman kid is tough. When he's on, imo, he's better than burns. Either way, he'll go high in the draft. Definitely a reason why so many pundits picked them as pre-season favorites to win it all.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4631]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson
1
May 27, 2024, 9:56 AM
|
|
Oh I'm sure he will be on lol....that's how our regional luck has rolled the last 5 years.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2521]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson
1
May 27, 2024, 9:15 AM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson ] |
|
I agree we are getting the shaft again probably. I don’t what is the logic of these selection committee. Just like our basketball team getting left out of the NCAAT 2 years ago.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24756]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 14553
Joined: 2013
|
Welp, Acuña is now out for the year. Go ahead and throw the Braves
1
May 27, 2024, 9:56 AM
|
|
Into our regional as well!
🙄
If LSU gets the 2 seed, something is very flawed with this selection system. Might as well lose more games during the regular season so you can have a lower seed and host Rhode Island, Colorado School for Miners, and Paul Mitchell Cosmetology.
~JKB
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4631]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Welp, Acuña is now out for the year. Go ahead and throw the Braves
2
May 27, 2024, 9:57 AM
|
|
Exactly....I thought being a national seed was supposed to reap some rewards.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22391]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 17586
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1318]
TigerPulse: 82%
28
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1318]
TigerPulse: 82%
28
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8116]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10208
Joined: 2010
|
Re: TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson
1
May 27, 2024, 10:28 AM
|
|
There's no way in hell the #6 national seed should get a regional with two teams that were ranked MOST of the season. I swear Clemson baseball has the worst luck when it comes to regional pairings. But hey, just play ball fellas!
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [1130]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson
May 27, 2024, 11:30 AM
|
|
Vandy LSU Coastal
Seems reasonable, for Clemson.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24756]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 14553
Joined: 2013
|
Too bad the 1927 Yankees are all dead.
May 27, 2024, 11:55 AM
|
|
They’d make a great addition to the Clemson Regional.
~JKB
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [71]
TigerPulse: 100%
8
|
Re: TNET: Final NCAA Baseball Tournament projections for Clemson
May 27, 2024, 2:56 PM
|
|
Whelp, we just saw how wrong the baseball prognosticators are. Out of 6 predictions only CCU was correct.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1806
|
|
|