Replies: 16
| visibility 66
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46797
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: WATCH: ESPN analysts debate if Clemson's 'back,' making Playoff
Oct 20, 2022, 1:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2563]
TigerPulse: 99%
32
|
Clown Show.
Oct 20, 2022, 2:19 PM
|
|
Didn't even watch this drivel.
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [40425]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 22753
Joined: 2003
|
The Minute I See Desmond's Stupid Punchable Face I
Oct 20, 2022, 2:29 PM
|
|
Switch off. Herbie's done sold out. Pollack is such a UGA homer. Reece isn't too bad.
|
|
|
|
 |
1st Rounder [614]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Ah Dez
Oct 20, 2022, 9:11 PM
|
|
Your opinion holds the weight of your tofu burger. And not the desserts you pound. Is that weird to any one else? No meat, gimme cake?
|
|
|
|
 |
Offensive Star [320]
TigerPulse: 67%
15
|
Re: The Minute I See Desmond's Stupid Punchable Face I
Oct 21, 2022, 8:14 PM
[ in reply to The Minute I See Desmond's Stupid Punchable Face I ] |
|
Pollack is just a tool bag!!! It’s incredible how any time there’s a discussion about Clemson it has a negative spin?? Stories like “will Clemson’s playoff hopes be over with a loss this week?” Or “Is Clemson Back?” Alabama gives up 52, loses to Tennessee after two close calls to Texas and Texas A&M and the articles are “Alabama still controls playoff destiny” or my favorite “If Bama isn’t in the CFP who should be?” It’s so tiresome and become so obvious? Listening to these morons is like watching MSNBC and listening to that cow Rachael Maddow tell you Joe Biden is doing a great job?
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9200]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
At this point, I think I would prefer to meet
Oct 20, 2022, 3:49 PM
|
|
Michigan in the first round and pound them down in front of DH
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27155]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 10255
Joined: 2015
|
Re: TNET: WATCH: ESPN analysts debate if Clemson's 'back,' making Playoff
Oct 20, 2022, 5:04 PM
|
|
Someone remind Dim-son Howard of his CFP picks for this year. Moran!
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [43176]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43582
Joined: 1998
|
1. T A&M 2. Baylor 3. Mich 4. Pitt***
Oct 20, 2022, 5:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Freshman [-98]
TigerPulse: 27%
-1
|
Re: TNET: WATCH: ESPN analysts debate if Clemson's 'back,' making Playoff
Oct 20, 2022, 9:11 PM
|
|
Desmond SCal Fan Boy Howard was all over the Trojan earlier this season. Dude has trash football opinions. I refuse to even watch him talk about Clemson . Hopefully it's good ... but this guy is so caught up in Rose Bowl delusion so i doubt it he talks good about Clemson
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [1088]
TigerPulse: 94%
25
|
The 2022 Tigers seem to be about as good as the 2017 Tigers
Oct 20, 2022, 9:30 PM
|
|
The 2022 Tigers are the 6th best Tiger team in the last 10 years.
The 2017 Tigers went 13-0 with the number one seed in the CFP.
They had some chances to beat Bama that year, but Bama was better.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2726]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Actually really like des
Oct 21, 2022, 7:20 AM
|
|
Just seems really happy to be doing what he’s doing. Don’t care if he thinks clemson is great or whatever.
Shouldn’t have won the heisman though. That was a joke
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2193]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: Actually really like des
Oct 21, 2022, 8:51 AM
|
|
Then, who should have won it? Casey Weldon? Ty Detmar? If we are fair and picking the real best player, then that was Washington NG Steve Emtman, but they don’t pick defensive linemen.
Na, they gave it to the right dude of skill position players.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2726]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Peyton Manning?***
Oct 21, 2022, 3:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2193]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: Actually really like des
Oct 21, 2022, 8:53 AM
[ in reply to Actually really like des ] |
|
Oh, and who wouldn’t be happy with that gravy job? I’d be happy being on tv talking trash all the time, too.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1811]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Actually really like des
Oct 21, 2022, 5:27 PM
[ in reply to Actually really like des ] |
|
He won the Heisman and Super Bowl MVP????
Who is stuffing the ballot box, he's probably a democrat!
I can tolerate Des on the panel, some of the others are worse....
At least he recognizes when Clemson is really good.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2193]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: TNET: WATCH: ESPN analysts debate if Clemson's 'back,' making Playoff
Oct 21, 2022, 8:46 AM
|
|
Just a reminder, Desmond Howard had Texas A$M in the playoffs and either he or another of those but-munches had Baylor in there, too. I’m not really concerned about their opinions on college football. They seem to know about as much as my wife does and I don’t listen to her, either.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [34712]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 14410
Joined: 2014
|
Re: TNET: WATCH: ESPN analysts debate if Clemson's 'back,' making Playoff
Oct 21, 2022, 8:53 AM
|
|
I don’t mind Desmond. Just don’t think he’s very good at predictions. He reminds me of the goofy kid that only gets to hang around with the other kids because he’s such a doofus it makes them laugh. Like a Gilligan kinda character.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 66
|
|
|