|
Replies: 34
| visibility 4204
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 48606
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
4
Feb 5, 2025, 11:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [3732]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
5
5
Feb 5, 2025, 11:49 AM
|
|
I am curious about all the hype behind Usc. I thought they lost like 35 players from last year and I do not see where they are just killing it in the portal.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [15606]
TigerPulse: 99%
50
|
Yep. I guess Illinois is a playoff contender too?
2
Feb 5, 2025, 11:58 AM
|
|
lol at the coots
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17207]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
3
Feb 5, 2025, 12:31 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks ] |
|
They did pretty well in the portal and out recruited us in 2024. Mostly due to their recruiting class was much larger than ours.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17207]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
3
Feb 5, 2025, 12:39 PM
|
|
BUT, I'm not insinuating they'll make the playoffs. I think 8-4 is very possible.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2822]
TigerPulse: 64%
33
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
1
Feb 5, 2025, 2:42 PM
|
|
Because they lose very little at all on offense and will have a more experienced line, plus Stewart will be more seasoned and they got some good guys in the portal to plug holes. Don’t think they’ll miss all of those leaving as much as we hope they do.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [15606]
TigerPulse: 99%
50
|
Wanna bet you dont do as well next year ?***
1
Feb 5, 2025, 4:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2822]
TigerPulse: 64%
33
|
Re: Wanna bet you dont do as well next year ?***
1
1
Feb 5, 2025, 9:19 PM
|
|
Tigers are on a mission with destiny next year: we’re going 12-0 baby!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5388]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Protector [1478]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
9
9
Feb 5, 2025, 11:49 AM
|
|
That is comical. Not a chance the coots are going to South Bend and beating ND. I don't know what is more comical, the Coots making the playoffs or them projected to beat ND in South Bend.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [965]
TigerPulse: 93%
24
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
2
Feb 5, 2025, 12:34 PM
|
|
Sports writers need something to do in the off season.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9407]
TigerPulse: 98%
44
|
0% chance the coots make the playoffs. ZERO.***
4
Feb 5, 2025, 11:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6852]
TigerPulse: 96%
41
|
Re: 0% chance the coots make the playoffs. ZERO.***
3
Feb 5, 2025, 11:59 AM
|
|
It's laughable how they build up the barnyard birds.Beat ND...no way, Sellers may win Heisman...belly laugh. Go to playoff...never.
Message was edited by: irmotig®
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2822]
TigerPulse: 64%
33
|
Re: 0% chance the coots make the playoffs. ZERO.***
1
Feb 5, 2025, 2:43 PM
|
|
So you don’t think they’ll ever make the playoff EVER in all of humanity?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [15606]
TigerPulse: 99%
50
|
Seems unlikely. Been a 125 years of suck.***
1
Feb 5, 2025, 4:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [19054]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 18878
Joined: 2010
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2822]
TigerPulse: 64%
33
|
Re: 0% chance the coots make the playoffs. ZERO.***
1
Feb 5, 2025, 9:18 PM
|
|
Seeing as there will never be a four team playoff again; you are correct lol!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7890]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [15606]
TigerPulse: 99%
50
|
Sellers finished with a #36 QBR and now hes a Heisman candidate ?
4
Feb 5, 2025, 11:56 AM
|
|
Riiight.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4824]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Sellers finished with a #36 QBR and now hes a Heisman candidate ?
4
Feb 5, 2025, 12:36 PM
|
|
I mean really. He’s a very good running back tho .
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [110300]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 30788
Joined: 2014
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
5
5
Feb 5, 2025, 12:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5794]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
3
Feb 5, 2025, 12:28 PM
|
|
Lmao..... this is funnier than their QB winning the heisman...dude can't hit the broadside of a barn.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [32265]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 23267
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
2
Feb 5, 2025, 12:38 PM
|
|
1. They are not mashing people. 2. They surprised people last year and their schedule, which looked wicked, turned to be a plus because of the circumstances such as Texas A&M playing the coots right giving their all to the Texas game. 3. The coots bowl game showed the country how to defend Sellars. He is their offense. 4. They lost almost all of their respectable defense. 5. You can't assemble a good team with a lot of transfers because of the inability to jell in a short period of time in most cases.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2916]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
Feb 6, 2025, 9:41 AM
|
|
All of the mouth breathers from the arm pit try and discredit their bowl game. 7 win season for the dirt peckers sellers is bye bye after this year also.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2822]
TigerPulse: 64%
33
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
1
Feb 6, 2025, 9:52 AM
|
|
Where is he going?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7940]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Right? I blame Wes's ineptitude for making Sellers look like a world beater.
Feb 5, 2025, 4:52 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks ] |
|
Against our Tigers D! Just horrible. But on the plus side it will be fun watching the coots week after week slink back into their despair under Sellers.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2822]
TigerPulse: 64%
33
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
1
Feb 5, 2025, 9:50 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks ] |
|
It’s funny because he’s in almost all of the major outlets early preseason top 5 for Heisman lists 😂
What are they seeing that we aren’t?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Commissioner [1263]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
1
Feb 5, 2025, 12:41 PM
|
|
No way the Gamecocks make the playoff, lost too many players.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [36576]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 15234
Joined: 1998
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
3
Feb 5, 2025, 12:49 PM
|
|
esecpn ghost writer trying to build up the sec power resume in the off season? LMAO
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [70758]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 20152
Joined: 2020
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
1
Feb 5, 2025, 1:10 PM
|
|
I thought it was cute. Did a good job blending a lot of truth and some humor. I'd love beating them in the playoffs and getting another shot at ocryo st.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Conqueror [11181]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 12186
Joined: 2003
|
We created this crap. Thats what happens when
Feb 5, 2025, 2:46 PM
|
|
you play not to lose.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7940]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Gamecocks will not make the CFP with 3 losses minimum again.
1
Feb 5, 2025, 4:47 PM
|
|
Looking at their schedule the cawks have a stretch against Bama, Ole Miss, Texas AM, OU, LSU. Then sprinkle in Missouri and Kentucky who over the years have beaten the mid-state knuckleheads soundly. Finished off by a much deserved thrashing by Clemson. They'll be lucky to make a bowl game. But anyhoo..whatevs.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5214]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
The state of South Carolina would be more radioactive
1
Feb 5, 2025, 5:43 PM
|
|
Than Chernobyl if this matchup occurred.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5388]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: TNET: Playoff projection pits Clemson vs. Gamecocks
Feb 5, 2025, 5:49 PM
|
|
SC is not sniffing the playoffs. It’s almost as if media guys don’t look at rosters. They just see how good sellers was and say oh he’s coming back. They’ll be just as good. That D is going back to being below average. Their offense won’t improve because they don’t have any play makers outside of Sellers. I’m smelling a sophomore slump for Sellers this year.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [34465]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 17076
Joined: 2015
|
I need some of what they're using....***
Feb 5, 2025, 7:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 34
| visibility 4204
|
|
|