Replies: 16
| visibility 211
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46843
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: High school prospects rank Clemson as top-5 brand in college football
Jul 28, 2022, 1:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [16687]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: TNET: High school prospects rank Clemson as top-5 brand in college football
Jul 28, 2022, 3:02 PM
|
|
I heard this news a couple weeks ago. Very impressive. The fact that it's high school prospects makes it all the better. I'm rather surprised N.D. comes in as low as 12th. Maybe even more so that the coots made the top 25th.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101299]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 48721
Joined: 2009
|
Coots about right @ 25; Dame about 10 & Tigers 4..
Jul 28, 2022, 3:19 PM
|
|
imho
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [2020]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Coots about right @ 25; Dame about 10 & Tigers 4..
Jul 28, 2022, 3:51 PM
|
|
I would have figured mid to high 30’s for the coots.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [10808]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Coots about right @ 25; Dame about 10 & Tigers 4..
Jul 28, 2022, 3:55 PM
|
|
Same here. I don't like them at 25 at all. But then everybody eats chicken.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4364]
TigerPulse: 89%
36
|
Keep in mind that SCAR is 15th out of 16 SEC teams.
Jul 28, 2022, 9:53 PM
|
|
Don’t be fooled by the 25th ranking. They got that by being in the SEC. But they still suck.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [62874]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62901
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4872]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [3625]
TigerPulse: 98%
35
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20960]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 15369
Joined: 2010
|
Considering the low number of offers Clemson makes ...
Jul 28, 2022, 6:21 PM
|
|
And the likelihood for recruits to select schools where they have a shot at being offered, this top 5 ranking is even more impressive! Great job Dabo and team!
|
|
|
|
 |
Starter [259]
TigerPulse: 96%
14
|
Re: TNET: High school prospects rank Clemson as top-5 brand in college football
Jul 28, 2022, 8:10 PM
|
|
It seems like a poll taken in the South with the lamecocks at 25, UCLA & USC both around 20 and all top 5 schools from the South. Either way I'll take it, Go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [16368]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: TNET: High school prospects rank Clemson as top-5 brand in college football
Jul 28, 2022, 10:18 PM
|
|
Every shred of respect and confidence in this study went down the drain when they listed South Carolina #25. Perhaps the entire study was conducted in Five Points.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Sports Icon [53396]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 15456
Joined: 2012
|
Y’all are CRAZY, NO WAY the coots are 25th
Jul 28, 2022, 10:21 PM
|
|
Maybe 125th but not 25th. I’ll bet a coot wrote this article!
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [9055]
TigerPulse: 97%
43
|
Bingo. Poll lost all credibility with that one.
Jul 28, 2022, 10:29 PM
|
|
A program that is literally irrelevant to the sport being in the top 25.....just nope.
|
|
|
|
 |
Dynasty Maker [3120]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: TNET: High school prospects rank Clemson as top-5 brand in college football
Jul 29, 2022, 6:30 AM
|
|
You have to remember, these are high school recruits, and all of them get a letter from USCE to fill the squad. So all of the hear about USCE. Congratulations to Dabo for putting us on the national map.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [217]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: TNET: High school prospects rank Clemson as top-5 brand in college football
Jul 29, 2022, 8:41 AM
|
|
Sad times in Tallahassee. Not that long ago they would have probably been top 3.
|
|
|
|
 |
Commissioner [923]
TigerPulse: 64%
24
|
No way Coots are 25th….this article is horse poo….Coots
Jul 29, 2022, 10:07 PM
|
|
Haven’t done anything, I’d put them in line with Eastern Michigan….
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 211
|
|
|