|
Replies: 20
| visibility 107
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46519
Joined: 2012
|
New Story: Howard's Rock Case: Will new charges hasten a trial date?
Jan 21, 2015, 4:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [76404]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 43685
Joined: 2004
|
It's about time.***
Jan 21, 2015, 4:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [30988]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 19049
Joined: 2000
|
GET A ROPE.....***
Jan 21, 2015, 5:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22966]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 25003
Joined: 1999
|
In excess of only $10k?????
Jan 21, 2015, 5:06 PM
|
|
I know that figure's simply a legal parameter, but I'd think any "memorabilia" expert would value The Rock at considerably more than that.....and I don't think six figures would be out of the realm of likelihood either. No matter what those mental midgets at usuck say, The Rock is irreplaceable....we'll find out soon if its irreparable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [26]
TigerPulse: 95%
3
|
Re: In excess of only $10k?????
Jan 21, 2015, 5:54 PM
|
|
Now we know why the missing piece has not been recovered. The lying scumbag is denying he ever did it!
A fine and slap on the wrist is too good for him!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2826]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
no kidding!
Jan 21, 2015, 5:58 PM
[ in reply to In excess of only $10k????? ] |
|
So what their saying is if we decided to stop using the rock and I had it and sold it on eBay I would only get 10k???? BS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1787]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
SC Code of Law 16-11-510 (B) (1)
Jan 21, 2015, 6:37 PM
[ in reply to In excess of only $10k????? ] |
|
This is the legal definition of felony Damage to Property under the SC Code of Law. There is no parameter in the law greater than $10,000 or more. If it was valued at $437 Billion the warrant would still say the same thing.
SC Code of Law 16-11-510, excerpt:
(B) A person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a:
(1) felony and, upon conviction, must be fined in the discretion of the court or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, if the injury to the property or the property loss is worth ten thousand dollars or more;
http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t16c011.php
Message was edited by: phonograf®
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13764]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
|
I love Clemson and Howard's Rock and all but
Jan 22, 2015, 11:34 AM
|
|
I think 437 billion is a little high.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4808]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Well, there's no such thing as super-duper-grand larceny
Jan 22, 2015, 7:57 AM
[ in reply to In excess of only $10k????? ] |
|
So it's really irrelevant how much it's worth once it crosses the $10,000 threshold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [775]
TigerPulse: 94%
22
|
Re: New Story: Howard's Rock Case: Will new charges hasten a trial date?
Jan 21, 2015, 6:55 PM
|
|
Very easy way to value it....Auction it off so someone can "own it" for a 4 year period. Put a plaque near it showing all the owners over the years. I guarantee you it will go for over $10k for the first 4 year owner!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8167]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Let him bust rocks in Prison, Hard Labor for this punk!**
Jan 21, 2015, 7:16 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2469]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
There will be some BS plea deal that will not
Jan 21, 2015, 8:56 PM
|
|
Amount to the damage that's been done. That always seems to be what happens
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2594]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
classic nucklehead play
Jan 22, 2015, 7:29 AM
|
|
Not sure this kid's team affiliation, but there's no way, (living in the south) that he didn't know the importance of Howard's rock. This is not a tree . Auburn has a ton of meaningless things that they say mean something. This rock is not replaceable. Frank Howard had one rock. It's not Howard's rock, because it came from death valley .CA. it's Howard's rock because it was giving as a gift to frank Howard. He didn't get two. There's no way to replace it. Like destroying the alamo and saying it was just and old building.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [179]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
The problem in comparing it to Auburn is that the trees were
Jan 21, 2015, 11:48 PM
|
|
not singularly unique. Each tree could not be identified as being a Toomer's Corner tree solely by it's appearance. They also have a life cycle. While they have lost the original oaks, once the transplanted oaks are rooted, the uniqueness will be repaired. The Rock will always look different. Oh...and Updike has only paid $99 of the $80k, I doubt he has the ability to ever pay it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [154]
TigerPulse: 23%
12
|
Re: New Story: Howard's Rock Case: Will new charges hasten a trial date?
Jan 21, 2015, 11:57 PM
|
|
Just let it go it's a rock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8867]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: New Story: Howard's Rock Case: Will new charges hasten a trial date?
Jan 22, 2015, 12:21 AM
|
|
What ever the stiffest penalty can be is what these kids get
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24205]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 24529
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2112]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: New Story: Howard's Rock Case: Will new charges hasten a trial date?
Jan 21, 2015, 11:59 PM
|
|
Where is the missing piece?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2680]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: New Story: Howard's Rock Case: Will new charges hasten a trial date?
Jan 22, 2015, 5:53 AM
|
|
I am having trouble understanding how the defense attorney can equate the Toomer's Corner oak tree situation with the vandalism of Howard's Rock. In the case of Howard's Rock, I believe there were two instances of "breaking and entering" when he scaled the outer fence and when he broke the plastic security case surrounding the rock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1482]
TigerPulse: 95%
29
|
Re: New Story: Howard's Rock Case: Will new charges hasten a trial date?
Jan 22, 2015, 8:03 AM
|
|
>I believe there were two
> instances of "breaking and entering" when he scaled
> the outer fence and when he broke the plastic
> security case surrounding the rock.
Indeed. The longer this jerk attorney spews out things like "chattel" (which is any property not real estate, replaceable or not)in attempts to minimize what turd has done, the more he needs to be arrested and transported before a Pickens GJ.
Perhaps picked up on a warrant at 3am for the burglary with force.
Then a week or so later, pick him up at an inconvenient time to appear for possession of tools used in the commission of a crime.
Spread the hearings out. Stay on the dad, too. Exhaust his family's ability to pay the attorney.
"Easily replaceable". Guh. I see what his argument is going to be. Good luck with that.
People in Amman were thrilled when their standing stone got wrecked. Go fart with the rocks in Alice Springs and see what the Aboriginees think. Maybe take a chip out of Scone and enjoy prison in Scotland.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8244]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
"Monty Hall"
Jan 22, 2015, 6:30 AM
|
|
thoughts, philosophy, perception, prudence, reckoning, sharp-wittedness,
powers of reasoning, reason, logic;
becomes more involved in this case now
"Lets Make A Deal"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 20
| visibility 107
|
|
|
50
