|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1
|
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43527
Joined: 12/12/12
|
TNET: Clemson's football facilities ranking in the new 247Sports top-5
Feb 28, 2023, 10:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [64593]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88998
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Lol...Chicken Central at No. 10...lol
3
Feb 28, 2023, 10:25 AM
|
|
Lipstick on a pig !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1469]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 812
Joined: 9/28/08
|
Re: Lol...Chicken Central at No. 10...lol
3
Feb 28, 2023, 10:30 AM
|
|
How big is the lamecock trophy room?--oh wait, I forgot.................
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17099]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4630
Joined: 1/31/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8038]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 10474
Joined: 11/28/03
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's football facilities ranking in the new 247Sports top-5
2
Feb 28, 2023, 11:07 AM
|
|
How do our basketball facilities compare in terms of spending on player amenities?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44066]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 32974
Joined: 2/22/03
|
LMAO
1
1
Feb 28, 2023, 12:37 PM
|
|
My thought exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11200]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5533
Joined: 11/22/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6153]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4043
Joined: 2/15/11
|
UNC was considered top-tier in the late 90s when Mac Brown
Feb 28, 2023, 11:13 AM
|
|
first arrived and got things moving During his first stint.
Just shows how much the arms race has grown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [871]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 284
Joined: 10/18/12
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's football facilities ranking in the new 247Sports top-5
Feb 28, 2023, 2:22 PM
|
|
And we are OK with this?
Top 5 today, top 10 next year, top 15 the next......
What happened to " Best is the standard " ??
Guess we are doing our best with what we have to work with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2084]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3355
Joined: 12/28/02
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's football facilities ranking in the new 247Sports top-5
Feb 28, 2023, 3:26 PM
|
|
Careful. I said that an hour ago and my post was removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1747]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1794
Joined: 1/24/09
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's football facilities ranking in the new 247Sports top-5
Feb 28, 2023, 3:28 PM
|
|
I toured the Clemson football facility in 2018 and I know I am biased but think Clemson’s should still be no. 1. Of course 247 sports is kind of biased also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8548]
TigerPulse: 48%
Posts: 11527
Joined: 9/9/06
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's football facilities ranking in the new 247Sports top-5
1
Feb 28, 2023, 5:09 PM
|
|
Add the over $60 million recently spent on Littlejohn, the new venues being built, softball venue, Lot 5/Tiger Walk and etc. and you will understand why we should not be concerned about the ACC TV contract. One thing we have is money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [404]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 415
Joined: 9/5/22
|
Re: TNET: Clemson's football facilities ranking in the new 247Sports top-5
Feb 28, 2023, 6:01 PM
|
|
How about the school itself get up to speed?
Parking for current students is an epic disaster. They also don’t have enough on campus housing for the amount of kids being admitted these days. This also exasperates kids cause everyone who isn’t a frosh has to live off campus now, but then they got no parking to make it to class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3242]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1553
Joined: 11/9/11
|
I have degrees from multiple institutions
Mar 1, 2023, 6:26 AM
|
|
And have attended four separate universities. The one common problem at all: terrible parking for students. Too many “teacher only” lots with over zealous university police writing tickets in creative ways. The last parking ticket I got at Clemson was because one of my tires was touching grass. Got the dreading “parking on landscaped areas” ticket. That’s another rant for another day. I’m in my 50’s now, I’m also back at the degree game and nothing has changed. I can’t physically ride a bicycle to class. The joys of grad school.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
