|
Replies: 100
| visibility 2224
|
All-TigerNet [5706]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
1
Sep 29, 2023, 3:42 PM
|
|
He has committed to name an African American woman to fill senator Feinstein’s senate seat, right?
I completely understand the desire to name a woman given the seat was held by a woman and over half the population is female.
But why is it ok for him to pick a candidate purely because of their race?
And, 39% of the population in California is Hispanic and only 5% is black. If you were interested in picking a candidate based on race (which I still disagree with) why not pick a Hispanic woman instead? Wouldn't that be more representative?
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [30601]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 23092
Joined: 2002
|
Its probably Kamala ... she can do both jobs ... with a
Sep 29, 2023, 3:46 PM
|
|
smile and a cackle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2395]
TigerPulse: 85%
32
|
Re: Its probably Kamala ... she can do both jobs ... with a
Sep 29, 2023, 9:54 PM
|
|
It is Kamala, then Joe(Bidan) puts Newsome at VP, then they dump fake Biden and have Mike Obama run as VP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4984]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 29, 2023, 3:49 PM
|
|
Biden vowed to do that with his VP pick. That worked out great so what is your problem? Oh wait……
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [36208]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 34637
Joined: 1999
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 29, 2023, 3:57 PM
|
|
I don't know what his reasoning was, but there are zero black women in the Senate right now, so maybe that's the reason. On the other hand, I think there's only one Hispanic woman, so your point is still good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4984]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
Sep 29, 2023, 4:01 PM
|
|
His reasoning is the same as when he announced he wanted to give millions to all the great great great great great grandyunguns of slaves. Its called pathetic pandering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [36208]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 34637
Joined: 1999
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
Sep 29, 2023, 4:02 PM
|
|
Good talk, Russ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4984]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
Sep 29, 2023, 4:09 PM
|
|
Truth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7686]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
1
Sep 29, 2023, 4:01 PM
|
|
Not only are things like competence or qualifications not high on the lefts lists for political appointments, they aren't on the list at all. Instead it's their gender, race and who they like to have sex with which are literally the only criteria taken into account. Good thing their voters are brain washed morons or this undisputable reality might cause them some problems. Morons appear to enjoy being led by morons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27824]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48313
Joined: 2010
|
All are merely figurehead positions. This administration is
Oct 2, 2023, 10:59 AM
|
|
currently being run by a 'select' group of Deep Staters both US and international.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1942]
TigerPulse: 96%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3230]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 29, 2023, 4:12 PM
|
|
He is pandering planning his run in 2028.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4984]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 29, 2023, 5:06 PM
|
|
He is pandering but I think your date is off. I think he is in the running for 2024.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3230]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 29, 2023, 5:22 PM
|
|
I think Biden is going to force it, but if Gavin is running, he has only a few months to decide, as does Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4984]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 29, 2023, 5:25 PM
|
|
I predict a “surprise” next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3230]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 29, 2023, 6:11 PM
|
|
It can't be too late. Whoever it is has to run a campaign.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4984]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 29, 2023, 6:13 PM
|
|
Could a shocker be pulled off at the convention? I dont know but maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
Sep 29, 2023, 6:20 PM
|
|
If his reasoning for doing it is because she's black, then he believes racial discrimination is ok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21656]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 12505
Joined: 2002
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
Sep 30, 2023, 10:24 AM
|
|
I totally agree with this.
If you are allowed to say: "I'm only considering a black female" for this job, how is that not discrimination against anyone who is not both black and female?
I don't even like the term "reverse discrimination". It's just simple, basic "discrimination". In this case, Newsome is discriminating against all males of every race, and against all white, Latina, and Asian females.
The glaring double standard being applied there absolutely does not help black females in the long term, either, because it builds up toxic resentment that they're getting special treatment, and that always has a cost that's bigger than the short-term benefit. You do not make up for racial and sexual injustices in the past by screwing over other races and sexes in the present because all you're really accomplishing is starting a whole new round of injustices and a whole new fight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 10:38 AM
|
|
Now, if Newsom's natural network is say overly white, then I think he should, and it would be wise, talk to leaders that are other races to determine who he believes is the best person.
This business of limiting your pool based on certain immutable characteristics is not only wrong but incredibly foolish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13749]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 10096
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 29, 2023, 6:40 PM
|
|
If this is ok- tell me why only hiring white, Christian males for my business is a problem.
As virtuous as you think you are… if the inverse is not ok- neither is your stance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3230]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 29, 2023, 6:46 PM
|
|
Only hiring them would create no diversity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13749]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 10096
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
Sep 29, 2023, 7:45 PM
|
|
So equity is the mission?
Can we arrest more females to make those numbers equal?
Can we force construction companies to hire more females?
Can we force 50% white professors at hbcu’s?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
Sep 29, 2023, 8:01 PM
|
|
I think you misunderstand the new leftist definition of 'diverse'. There are 'diverse' people and 'non diverse' people. The people you originally described are 'non diverse' people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3230]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13749]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 10096
Joined: 2006
|
Not at all the question.
Sep 30, 2023, 10:49 AM
|
|
Is there an issue with it? Legal or moral?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4984]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 4:51 AM
[ in reply to Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic ] |
|
I will answer your question. If it is ok to publicly declare you will only appoint a black woman then ,yes, it is absolutely ok for you to hire only white men if you choose. They can not have their one way racist discrimination and that is what Newsome is doing. Biden did it and look at the gem of a VP we got.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 6:09 AM
|
|
I'm LOLing at how the MAGAts are triggered over the possibility of a black woman in the Senate. Great Replacment theory, correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 6:26 AM
|
|
You believe it's ok to discriminate based on skin color
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 7:44 AM
|
|
No discrimination here. This position is being temporarily filled until election. Senators represent the people of the United States, all of us. There are currently 0 African American females out of 100. Is 1 out of 100 too much for you to handle? LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
Sep 30, 2023, 7:57 AM
|
|
If you decide to not consider a candidate based on their race and only consider candidates based on race, then that is discrimination. It's not even debatable. It's a fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 9:15 AM
|
|
Who are the candidates and what criteria should be used?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 9:26 AM
|
|
I'm just explaining to you racial discrimination. You don't seem to understand what that means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 9:47 AM
|
|
Where is the discrimination? The person making the decision believes a person of color would be a welcome addition to the Senate which currently does not have a woman of color and the Senate does represent the entire population. Can you identify what criteria you believe should be used?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 9:52 AM
|
|
If you believe that choosing someone based on a pool of one race is not racial discrimination, then you don't know the meaning of racial discrimination.
See below for your second question.
Message was edited by: p6fuller®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
1
Sep 30, 2023, 10:32 AM
|
|
You seem to have trouble identifying the criteria used to fill this vacancy. Why is that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 10:47 AM
|
|
You seem to have trouble with basic logic. Why is that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 10:54 AM
|
|
Why can't you tell us the criteria?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 11:00 AM
|
|
I've already told you. The criteria could be a lot of things.
Why do you keep asking the same question that I have already answered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 11:22 AM
|
|
Why can't you define the criteria? Maybe cause their isn't any? LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 11:31 AM
|
|
That statement doesn't make a lot of sense, based my original assertion that Newsom's decision to appoint someone based on skin color is discriminatory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 11:39 AM
|
|
We have laws on racial discrimination. Are you confident your point will be validated by the upcoming lawsuits?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 11:43 AM
|
|
My point doesn't have to be validated by a legal opinion. It's a simple fact based on the definition of discrimination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 4:46 PM
|
|
How do think the lawsuits for racial discrimination will go?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
^^^^^^^^^^^
Sep 30, 2023, 4:58 PM
|
|
Has problems with basic logic and basic English
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Sep 30, 2023, 5:33 PM
|
|
But I have to say, your question is indicative of the current leftist view of how the judiciary should be used.
Message was edited by: p6fuller®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Sep 30, 2023, 6:52 PM
[ in reply to ^^^^^^^^^^^ ] |
|
Since this is obviously racial discrimination and we have laws against it, how will the upcoming lawsuits turnout? I'll wait.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Sep 30, 2023, 8:06 PM
|
|
Still doesn't understand basic logic and basic English
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Sep 30, 2023, 8:09 PM
[ in reply to Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^ ] |
|
Do you think that limiting a pool of appointees based on race is discrimination?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Sep 30, 2023, 8:10 PM
|
|
You seem to be stuck
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Sep 30, 2023, 8:13 PM
|
|
I'm embarrassed for our engineering program that it would graduate someone that doesn't understand basic logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Sep 30, 2023, 8:20 PM
[ in reply to Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^ ] |
|
If this really is racial discrimination, then there will surely be lawsuits, correct? Still waiting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Sep 30, 2023, 8:22 PM
|
|
You should answer my question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Sep 30, 2023, 8:28 PM
|
|
And no. What you say is not correct.
If someone chooses to limit a pool based on race, is that not racial discrimination?
I'm not sure why this is such a hard question for you to answer.
It's a simple question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 8:02 AM
|
|
How is the upcoming lawsuits going to turn out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 8:30 AM
|
|
Stop. You're embarrassing yourself. I'm actually embarrassed for you at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 10:28 AM
|
|
You don't seem very confident that a successful lawsuit will take place, do you? What does that say about your narrative of "racial discrimination"? 😆
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 10:35 AM
|
|
It's not a narrative. It's a fact.
Given your thought process on this, you believe all discrimination is settled in court. Either that, or you're just illogical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 11:10 AM
|
|
Why do you not feel confident that there will be a successful lawsuit since you are certain this is racial discrimination?
#Checkmate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 12:44 PM
|
|
I never said anything about a lawsuit. That's something the phantoms in your head brought up.
I think you're better off sticking to checkers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 1:02 PM
|
|
You won't address the potential lawsuit because you're not confident that a case of racial discrimination would fly here. That destroys your whole narrative. Facts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 1:12 PM
|
|
Apparently you have poor reading skills. I've said on multiple occasions that it doesn't matter if there is a lawsuit, the racial discrimination is apparent here.
There's not a question as to whether limiting a pool of appointees based on race is racial discrimination. It is, based on the definition of discrimination. There is no question about this. Definitionally, this is discrimination.
My prediction of your next post - "were wuter bout the lawsuits"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 2:34 PM
|
|
It most certainly does matter if their is a successful lawsuit. The lack of such verifies that there isn't racial discrimination in this case as their are laws against it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [52741]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 32626
Joined: 1999
|
p6...Let it go. He admitted yesterday he was a moron, and if
Oct 2, 2023, 2:40 PM
|
|
you argue with a moron he'll just bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: p6...Let it go. He admitted yesterday he was a moron, and if
Oct 2, 2023, 2:55 PM
|
|
I like making him skip
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 2:54 PM
[ in reply to Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^ ] |
|
A lack of a successful lawsuit doesn't mean that there is no racial discrimination. How would you come to that conclusion?
If that were the case, then that would mean all racial discrimination is successfully litigated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 3:26 PM
|
|
YOU are making the claim that Newsome is breaking the law. Why do you not feel confident about lawsuits?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^
Oct 2, 2023, 3:53 PM
|
|
I never made a claim that Newsom is breaking the law. Another argument that the phantoms in your head made up. Although, were this a business that was hiring someone, Newsom would be violating the law.
I'm saying, based on the definition of discrimination, limiting your pool based on race is racial discrimination. Newsom said that he would do this. Newsom is discriminating based on race. There is no reasonable debate about this.
One could debate the merits of racial discrimination in this matter, but the absolute fact is that Newsom is discriminating based on race.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27824]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48313
Joined: 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3230]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Sep 30, 2023, 7:53 AM
[ in reply to Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic ] |
|
I agree with them on this on. A black woman would be fine, but I don't believe that should be the guaranteed criteria. Interview everyone and get the best person. If that person ends up being a black woman, that's fine. Just don't start with only looking for a black woman to start the process. I think that's what even the MAGA cult thinks as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5706]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Do you think there aren't any qualified Hispanic women in California?
1
1
Sep 30, 2023, 9:03 AM
[ in reply to Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic ] |
|
I'm LOL ing at your use of LOL ing
Why can he just name an African American woman to the seat?
Why does he have to set it out as the selection criteria?
It demeens the credentials of the ultimate appointee and it makes him look like a total pandering woke point #####
And it's dumb politics to spit in the face of your largest constituency (Hispanic women)
Do you and nesome think there aren't any qualified Hispanic women that could fill that seat?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Do you think there aren't any qualified Hispanic women in California?
Sep 30, 2023, 9:16 AM
|
|
What criteria should be used? I'll wait.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Do you think there aren't any qualified Hispanic women in California?
Sep 30, 2023, 9:28 AM
|
|
Ones that don't discriminate based on skin color.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Do you think there aren't any qualified Hispanic women in California?
Sep 30, 2023, 9:45 AM
|
|
What's the criteria? You don't know, do you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Do you think there aren't any qualified Hispanic women in California?
Sep 30, 2023, 10:03 AM
|
|
In Newsom's case, it seems that being a black woman is the primary criteria.
The criteria could be a number of things, but if race is one of them then the criteria is discriminatory.
This is a pretty basic idea, for people who believe racial discrimination is wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Do you think there aren't any qualified Hispanic women in California?
Sep 30, 2023, 10:30 AM
|
|
We have laws against racial discrimination. Let's see the results of the upcoming lawsuits on this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Just be honest
Sep 30, 2023, 10:46 AM
|
|
You think discrimination based on skin color is ok, at least in certain circumstances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Just be honest
Sep 30, 2023, 10:53 AM
|
|
In order to determine discrimination, we need to identify the criteria. What is it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Another
Sep 30, 2023, 11:01 AM
|
|
Illogical statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Another
Sep 30, 2023, 11:22 AM
|
|
Explain. You can't, can you? LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Another
Sep 30, 2023, 11:38 AM
|
|
It's pretty easy to explain.
Newsom is going to use skin color to determine his pool of choices.
Making a decision based on skin color is racially discriminatory.
Newsom's decision to only choose from a pool of one race, is racially discriminatory.
You don't need to know any other criterion to understand this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Another
Sep 30, 2023, 7:21 PM
|
|
Tell us about how you perceive the upcoming lawsuits to turn out on this. Waiting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Another
Sep 30, 2023, 8:32 PM
|
|
Tell me how my logic is flawed.
The whole board is waiting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Another
Sep 30, 2023, 8:34 PM
|
|
You would be much better to say that you believe that racial discrimination is ok under certain circumstances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Another
Oct 2, 2023, 8:03 AM
|
|
How are the upcoming lawsuits going to turn out?
😆
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Another
Oct 2, 2023, 8:29 AM
|
|
You're skipping now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Another
Oct 2, 2023, 10:27 AM
|
|
You don't seem very confident that a successful lawsuit will take place, do you? What does that say about your narrative of "racial discrimination"? 😆
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Another
Oct 2, 2023, 10:39 AM
|
|
Whether or not a lawsuit takes place, is a separate issue from limiting a pool based on race being racial discrimination.
If you believe that limiting a pool of choices based on race is ok, then you believe that racial discrimination is ok. That's not a narrative. That's a simple fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Another
Oct 2, 2023, 11:08 AM
|
|
Again, what is the criteria of the job? You refuse to answer this question as well. Maybe the Governor believes that a female of color is best for the job. There's a reason why you refuse to give the criteria of the job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Another
Oct 2, 2023, 12:51 PM
|
|
Neither of your arguments of criteria for the job or the legal ramifications, have anything to do with the fact that limiting a pool based on race is in fact racial discrimination.
Believing that a black woman is the right person for the job and limiting your pool to black women from the outset are two different things. You obviously are not able to understand this concept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5246]
TigerPulse: 79%
38
|
Re: Another
Oct 2, 2023, 1:07 PM
|
|
It may be the governors belief that having at least 1 black woman out of 100 in the US Senate better represents the population, which is what the US Senate does. Do you disagree with that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32941]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16694
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Another
Oct 2, 2023, 1:15 PM
|
|
That may be so, so in that case Newsom (and you) believe that racial discrimination is ok in this circumstance. Not that there is no racial discrimination in his decision making process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5706]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [52741]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 32626
Joined: 1999
|
Newsome is just following Joementia's lead here.
Sep 30, 2023, 8:11 AM
|
|
Remember he said he would only nominate a black woman for SCOTUS (although that person can't define what a woman is).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3230]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Newsome is just following Joementia's lead here.
Sep 30, 2023, 8:16 AM
|
|
Any black person who idetifies as a woman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [978]
TigerPulse: 99%
24
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Oct 2, 2023, 7:53 AM
|
|
Well, looks like he's appointing a black female lesbian. So, she's got all the boxes checked. Newsom knows what he's doing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4984]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Oct 2, 2023, 2:42 PM
|
|
Is she really a lesbian? So friggin predictable. Unbelievable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [48664]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 43379
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Ok resident libtards, please explain Governor Nesomes logic
Oct 2, 2023, 7:56 AM
|
|
"Hi guys, I'd to have a discussion on this particular topic but let me call you all 'libtards' before we start."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27824]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48313
Joined: 2010
|
At least YOU recognized your calling... That's not debatable***
Oct 2, 2023, 11:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 100
| visibility 2224
|
|
|
50
