|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1061
|
TigerNet Icon [153758]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35742
Joined: 2010
|
College Football Playoff Committee selection process
12
12
Dec 3, 2023, 10:05 AM
|
|
“Proposed Selection Process:
Establish a selection committee that will be instructed to place an emphasis on winning conference championships, strength of schedule and head‐to‐head competition when comparing teams with similar records and pedigree (treat final determination like a tie‐breaker; apply specific guidelines).”
https://collegefootballplayoff.com/sports/2016/10/24/selection-committee-protocol
UGA is out.
Texas is in ahead of Alabama
FSU is an undefeated champion
FSU has the highest ranked SOR, higher than Alabama’s.
Michigan
Washington
FSU
Texas
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [16849]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 13348
Joined: 1998
|
Re: College Football Playoff Committee selection process
4
Dec 3, 2023, 10:12 AM
|
|
|
|
SOS SOR Key Wins
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Icon [153758]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35742
Joined: 2010
|
Was just editing to add that info!
3
Dec 3, 2023, 10:13 AM
|
|
TU.
Message was edited by: Francis Marion®
Message was edited by: Francis Marion®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13817]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
|
Re: Was just editing to add that info!
5
5
Dec 3, 2023, 10:23 AM
|
|
Bama & UGA’s out of conference schedules look like a bad joke. Between the 2 of them, they played ONE real OOC game, Bama played Texas @ home and lost badly.
UGA’s whole schedule is ridiculous.
Road games, @ UT, @ Vandy, @ Jacksonville….That’s it. Anybody that wants to tell me UGA playing in Atlanta is not a home game, is too stupid to warrant a response.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet HOFer [122668]
TigerPulse: 100%
66
Posts: 78411
Joined: 2003
|
this leaves far too much opportunity for a boring Playoff
4
Dec 3, 2023, 10:15 AM
|
|
and not enough emphasis on Brand Recognition.
Without the possibility of a UGA/ Bama Rematch, I just do not see this being a very profitable year for the NCAA's corporate partners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16849]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 13348
Joined: 1998
|
Re: this leaves far too much opportunity for a boring Playoff
5
5
Dec 3, 2023, 10:17 AM
|
|
I saw that too in the eSECpn cliff notes. Good point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13817]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24052]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 15552
Joined: 1995
|
I think you are spot on.
3
Dec 3, 2023, 10:16 AM
|
|
FSU beat LSU and Florida from the SEC.
And now that Clemson win is looking better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Icon [153758]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35742
Joined: 2010
|
Its fun to put yourself in the shoes of a committee member
1
Dec 3, 2023, 10:34 AM
|
|
look at the criteria, look at the data, and decide how you’d vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2194]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: College Football Playoff Committee selection process
6
6
Dec 3, 2023, 10:18 AM
|
|
FM, yours is the best post on this topic. End of discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32421]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 13700
Joined: 1998
|
Re: College Football Playoff Committee selection process
4
Dec 3, 2023, 10:18 AM
|
|
yeppers, to me; this is the most cut and dried decision for the committee ever!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26723]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
|
Re: College Football Playoff Committee selection process
2
Dec 3, 2023, 10:18 AM
|
|
👏👏👏👏👏
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [107]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Hard to argue with the rules.
Dec 3, 2023, 10:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4605]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: College Football Playoff Committee selection process
1
Dec 3, 2023, 10:30 AM
|
|
This is the only outcome that makes sense to me. Anything else and the fix is in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4913]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Correct but youve forgotten they must
3
Dec 3, 2023, 10:31 AM
|
|
Put in an SEC. They will do the mental gymnastics to make it happen. Maybe even put in both UGA and Bama.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1061
|
|
|
50
