Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
usc and VT are really bad
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Tiger Boards - Clemson Basketball
add New Topic
Replies: 11
| visibility 2955

usc and VT are really bad

3
Nov 27, 2024, 7:40 PM

We should beat these two by 20+.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: usc and VT are really bad

2
Nov 27, 2024, 7:56 PM

Just saying. Va Tech might be worse team in the ACC, and the Coots can't put them away and score. Just awful...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: usc and VT are really bad

1
Nov 27, 2024, 10:45 PM

Good win for Louisville. Surprise team of the acc this year?

What has happened to va tech? Miami doesn't look good either? Calling nctigs or judge.

nctigs®

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: usc and VT are really bad

1
Nov 28, 2024, 8:38 AM

Louisville was going to be much improved this year. Not sure how much of a surprise that is. They were picked 9th out of 18.

Vt is not as good because they lost a lot and didnt replace them with as good of players. This was expected too. They were picked 14th. They lost padulla, kidd, etc. they post their entire starting 5

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: usc and VT are really bad


Nov 28, 2024, 10:19 PM

Thank you for the response mountaineers. I did realize where they were picked and I knew they lost some good ones. I should have worded my question better.

I was referring more to their overall program. They had some decent teams and seemed to be the team on the rise. Now they may not even be a quad 2 team. Anyway, thanks.

As for Louisville, I definitely think they finish a lot higher than middle acc. Time will tell. But we're top 3.

Clemson mountaineers®

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: usc and VT are really bad


Nov 30, 2024, 8:49 PM

No problem, and sorry if I misunderstood.

Can't wait for the Kentucky game this week!

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: usc and VT are really bad

2
Nov 28, 2024, 8:33 AM

Remember when mike young was a significantly better coach than brownell?

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: usc and VT are really bad

2
Nov 28, 2024, 5:16 PM

Those seem to be the good old days. However we have not beat VT yet this year in BB

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: usc and VT are really bad

1
Nov 28, 2024, 8:33 AM

Remember when mike young was a significantly better coach than brownell?

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: usc and VT are really bad

2
Nov 28, 2024, 8:42 PM

Mike Young has an ACC Tourney Championship after only being there 5 years. Bronwnell has o in 15 years.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: usc and VT are really bad

1

Nov 28, 2024, 10:21 PM

I wouldn’t say USuCk is really bad but they aren’t as good as they’re hyped up to be. We should beat them by two scores but with sec refs anything could happen.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: usc and VT are really bad


Nov 28, 2024, 10:22 PM

I crap I thought this was a football post my bad.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 11
| visibility 2955
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...103 days!!!

by O.J.

Tiger Boards - Clemson Basketball
add New Topic