|
Replies: 13
| visibility 59
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46805
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: 2019 Clemson-Alabama title game had massive TV ratings
Jan 29, 2019, 11:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [121418]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 77803
Joined: 2003
|
Re: TNET: 2019 Clemson-Alabama title game had massive TV ratings
Jan 29, 2019, 11:28 AM
|
|
this does not even count all of the people that watched the pirated stream I linked on Tnet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [278]
TigerPulse: 93%
14
|
Re: TNET: 2019 Clemson-Alabama title game had massive TV ratings
Jan 29, 2019, 11:30 AM
|
|
Nor does it count me, living and watching in England
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10297]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 16965
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9274]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: TNET: 2019 Clemson-Alabama title game had massive TV ratings
Jan 29, 2019, 11:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1816]
TigerPulse: 67%
31
|
Final #s differ greatly vs overnights. Bama-UGA natty bigger
Jan 29, 2019, 11:48 AM
|
|
Apparently the online-viewing Nielson numbers added greatly to the overnight Nielson numbers (which I assume are almost instantly reported from cable/satellite set top boxes). And apparently the viewership numbers dropped greatly for the second half-blowout.
I would have thought that the Bama-UGA natty would have drawn less interest since it was 2 SEC teams (therefore of less interest to folks from other conferences) but it looks like that game had a larger viewership.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2019/01/08/clemson-blowout-draws-lowest-tv-ratings-for-cfp-title-game/38863005/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24080]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 20313
Joined: 2011
|
Yes they do, that's why you're having to post a week old
Jan 29, 2019, 12:13 PM
|
|
article to argue about updated numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6825]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Final #s differ greatly vs overnights. Bama-UGA natty bigger
Jan 29, 2019, 3:12 PM
[ in reply to Final #s differ greatly vs overnights. Bama-UGA natty bigger ] |
|
Atlanta and Birmingham viewing area might be the two largest college football TV market... I would have to check, maybe Houston/Dallas might be mixed in, but both cities have higher CF following per capita.
Plus, people watch a trainwreck and I always play "where's waldo" with UGA in the 4th quarter. haven't found them yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11774]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: TNET: 2019 Clemson-Alabama title game had massive TV ratings
Jan 29, 2019, 12:03 PM
|
|
Pity they can't count the DVR'd replays of the game...Pretty sure the TNET crew could bump the percentage up a point or two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2184]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Errbody Saw the tail whoopin!***
Jan 29, 2019, 1:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5304]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: TNET: 2019 Clemson-Alabama title game had massive TV ratings
Jan 29, 2019, 1:44 PM
|
|
Man, what happened to Clemson/Alabama fatigue?Lol. Guess people weren't fatigued watching Alabama get smacked around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1374]
TigerPulse: 95%
28
|
Free Clemson Advertising
Jan 29, 2019, 2:26 PM
|
|
These 4 CFP appearances have been like free advertising for Clemson University, and that's not even counting the extra exposure they're bringing on Youtube and social media.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3313]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Can't be right... thought everyone was sick up Clemson/Bama
Jan 30, 2019, 10:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23505]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
Most any football fan was
Jan 30, 2019, 10:52 AM
|
|
Going to at least tune in for a score update and many were going to check in during the second half to see if the ending would mirror the '15 and '16 finishes. My hunch is when word got around about the halftime score, more viewers came to see the blood in the water (very crimson!) and what the sharks would do next. Face it, 'Dirty Laundry' draws eyes...Don knew that! (Bubble-headed bleach-blond, aside!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 59
|
|
|
50
