|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1609
|
Paw Master [16842]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 13345
Joined: 1998
|
So this was a blowout, right?
13
13
Jan 2, 2025, 7:50 PM
|
|
ND wins by 13 over UGA
TX wins by 14 over Clemson
Blowouts, right Finebaum?
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [26637]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
|
Re: So this was a blowout, right?
3
Jan 2, 2025, 7:52 PM
|
|
Paul ain't gonna like this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4408]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: So this was a blowout, right?
6
6
Jan 2, 2025, 7:53 PM
|
|
He isn’t gonna like it, but this outcome was predictable to anyone who had been paying attention to UGA without sec glasses. I mean it took them how many overtime’s to beat GT? Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60086]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 45309
Joined: 2003
|
3 or 4 overtimes and at least 2 or 3 refs. They had the refs tonight as well
1
Jan 2, 2025, 8:30 PM
|
|
but couldn't get the overtimes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21016]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 15393
Joined: 2010
|
Seemed like UGA got the calls today
2
Jan 2, 2025, 7:55 PM
|
|
And it did not matter! And how about Notre Dame Special Teams!
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [74338]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 13487
Joined: 2019
|
Re: So this was a blowout, right?
1
Jan 2, 2025, 7:58 PM
|
|
Georgia won in everything except turnovers and score. Ball protection was the difference as it usually is in big games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11805]
TigerPulse: 97%
46
Posts: 14453
Joined: 2021
|
Re: So this was a blowout, right?
Jan 2, 2025, 8:31 PM
|
|
ND destroyed the left side of UGA’s O-line.
That was the reason why UGA was so weak overall on offense.
It sure didn’t help UGA when their WR dropped that easy uncontested long bomb pass.
UGA QB Gunner Stockton actually played a very good game, considering the terrible blocking from the left side, especially LT and former Clemson target Monroe Freeling. As usual, Trevor Etienne played to down to the standard that is associated with overrated big name recruits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1869]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: So this was a blowout, right?
1
Jan 2, 2025, 8:31 PM
[ in reply to Re: So this was a blowout, right? ] |
|
Stats were pretty close. ND had more rush yds, slight edge in time of possession, 3rd down conversions, sacks, and better special teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8663]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: So this was a blowout, right?
1
Jan 2, 2025, 8:00 PM
|
|
And our game was more competitive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [36035]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 14638
Joined: 2014
|
Re: So this was a blowout, right?
2
Jan 2, 2025, 8:00 PM
|
|
Our game felt a lot closer in the 4th quarter than this one did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8663]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: So this was a blowout, right?
1
Jan 2, 2025, 8:28 PM
|
|
Exactly. Georgia was dominated from start to finish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32219]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 13645
Joined: 1998
|
Re: So this was a blowout, right?
2
Jan 2, 2025, 8:01 PM
|
|
Yep, definitely should not have been there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1609
|
|
|
50
