|
Replies: 29
| visibility 99
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101299]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 48721
Joined: 2009
|
CU's RB GallMAN has more rushing yds than OKies Perine!
Dec 30, 2015, 12:18 PM
|
|
??
|
|
|
|
 |
MVP [522]
TigerPulse: 79%
19
|
Perineum splits time with Mixon***
Dec 30, 2015, 12:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5304]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***
Dec 30, 2015, 12:26 PM
|
|
Gallman splits time with Brooks, Fuller, and Davidson...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [14]
TigerPulse: 44%
2
|
Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***
Dec 30, 2015, 12:28 PM
|
|
So what? Perine has more yards per carry and more touchdowns. He's better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Youre doing the lords work.***
Dec 30, 2015, 12:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5304]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***
Dec 30, 2015, 12:41 PM
[ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ] |
|
Not when counting he's facing these defensive lines:
and they are facing these:
But don't let adjusted facts from footballoutsiders get in the way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [14]
TigerPulse: 44%
2
|
Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***
Dec 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
|
|
> Not when counting he's facing these defensive lines:
>
>
>
> and they are facing these:
>
>
> But don't let adjusted facts from footballoutsiders
> get in the way.
Sucks for him. Perine still is better,even behind am shoddy makeshift line who had a grand total 28 starts coming into this season. Maybe next year!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
How many true freshman are on your Oline?***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [14]
TigerPulse: 44%
2
|
Re: How many true freshman are on your Oline?***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:08 PM
|
|
What difference does that make? There were over 100 teams returning more starts on the Oline than OU. They had 4 new starters, including two freshmen. One is AA, which is nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [14]
TigerPulse: 44%
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
So a push at best?***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [10]
TigerPulse: 23%
2
|
Re: So a push at best?***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:13 PM
|
|
We have 2 NFL backs. I'm not even sure who the hell you all even have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5304]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Is that the guy with more rushing yards than Perine?***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5304]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Is that the guy with more rushing yards than Perine?***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:29 PM
|
|
Ye0, but then there's #82 Watson, that is sitting higher than that #108 "NFL back" he's talking about....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19919]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [14]
TigerPulse: 44%
2
|
Re: So a push at best?***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:16 PM
[ in reply to So a push at best?*** ] |
|
A push in regard to returning starts, sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
So the whole makeshift line factor kinda falls apart.***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [14]
TigerPulse: 44%
2
|
Re: So the whole makeshift line factor kinda falls apart.***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:25 PM
|
|
How? The clemson line returned nearly 20 more starts than OU did and OU's running game was still more impressive in spite of it. It's not a slight to admit OU has better running backs. Your qb is a much better runner than the OU qb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [177]
TigerPulse: 65%
12
|
Re: So the whole makeshift line factor kinda falls apart.***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:35 PM
|
|
> How? The clemson line returned nearly 20 more starts
> than OU did and OU's running game was still more
> impressive in spite of it. It's not a slight to
> admit OU has better running backs. Your qb is a much
> better runner than the OU qb.
Are you currently high? Our only returning starter was benched early in the year. We have five new starters on the ol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Actually you have to cut 15 of those starts. After that
Dec 30, 2015, 4:47 PM
|
|
Hey Midnight Toker I was enjoying this debate. Care to come back?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 73%
1
|
Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:03 PM
[ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ] |
|
Huh? Based on your chart:
Oklahoma Avg Opp Rnk: 54.9
Clemson Avg Opp Rnk: 60.9
And that conveniently omits Wofford. Galman played an extra game, so total yards isn't a fair comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5304]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:07 PM
|
|
You are only reading one stat there..adjusted line yards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5304]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:09 PM
|
|
And if you are counting that one..clemson had faced 4 in the top 20 while OU faced faced only 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19919]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [177]
TigerPulse: 65%
12
|
Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:28 PM
[ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ] |
|
> Huh? Based on your chart:
>
> Oklahoma Avg Opp Rnk: 54.9
> Clemson Avg Opp Rnk: 60.9
>
> And that conveniently omits Wofford. Galman played an
> extra game, so total yards isn't a fair comparison.
> Huh? Based on your chart:
>
> Oklahoma Avg Opp Rnk: 54.9
> Clemson Avg Opp Rnk: 60.9
>
> And that conveniently omits Wofford. Galman played an
> extra game, so total yards isn't a fair comparison.
Gallman sat out one of our easiest games so no he didn't play an extra game. Sorry coot
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10134]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***
Dec 30, 2015, 1:33 PM
[ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ] |
|
If I've not mistaken, I think Galman sit out the wake forest game as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7293]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13799
Joined: 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3438]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 29
| visibility 99
|
|
|
50
