Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
CU's RB GallMAN has more rushing yds than OKies Perine!
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 29
| visibility 1

CU's RB GallMAN has more rushing yds than OKies Perine!


Dec 30, 2015, 12:18 PM

??

badge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonorlightbulbbill.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 12:19 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 12:26 PM

Gallman splits time with Brooks, Fuller, and Davidson...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 12:28 PM

So what? Perine has more yards per carry and more touchdowns. He's better.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Youre doing the lords work.***


Dec 30, 2015, 12:35 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 12:41 PM [ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ]

Not when counting he's facing these defensive lines:



and they are facing these:


But don't let adjusted facts from footballoutsiders get in the way.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 12:54 PM

> Not when counting he's facing these defensive lines:
>
>
>
> and they are facing these:
>
>
> But don't let adjusted facts from footballoutsiders
> get in the way.

Sucks for him. Perine still is better,even behind am shoddy makeshift line who had a grand total 28 starts coming into this season. Maybe next year!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How many true freshman are on your Oline?***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:06 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: How many true freshman are on your Oline?***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:08 PM

What difference does that make? There were over 100 teams returning more starts on the Oline than OU. They had 4 new starters, including two freshmen. One is AA, which is nice.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: How many true freshman are on your Oline?***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:10 PM [ in reply to How many true freshman are on your Oline?*** ]

Clemson returned 45 starts, OU returned 28 starts. Which is bad.

http://philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/JUNE15/DBJune04.html

clemson 105th in the country
OU 120th in the country in returning starts from the previous year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So a push at best?***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:11 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So a push at best?***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:13 PM

We have 2 NFL backs. I'm not even sure who the hell you all even have.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So a push at best?***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:15 PM

The guy sitting at #24:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/statistics/player/_/stat/rushing/sort/rushingYards

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Is that the guy with more rushing yards than Perine?***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:17 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Is that the guy with more rushing yards than Perine?***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:29 PM

Ye0, but then there's #82 Watson, that is sitting higher than that #108 "NFL back" he's talking about....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

#14 from WVU. I think I would consider changing my name.***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:19 PM [ in reply to Re: So a push at best?*** ]



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So a push at best?***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:16 PM [ in reply to So a push at best?*** ]

A push in regard to returning starts, sure.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So the whole makeshift line factor kinda falls apart.***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:19 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So the whole makeshift line factor kinda falls apart.***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:25 PM

How? The clemson line returned nearly 20 more starts than OU did and OU's running game was still more impressive in spite of it. It's not a slight to admit OU has better running backs. Your qb is a much better runner than the OU qb.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So the whole makeshift line factor kinda falls apart.***


Dec 30, 2015, 3:57 PM

> How? The clemson line returned nearly 20 more starts
> than OU did and OU's running game was still more
> impressive in spite of it. It's not a slight to
> admit OU has better running backs. Your qb is a much
> better runner than the OU qb.

Are you currently high? Our only returning starter was benched early in the year. We have five new starters on the ol

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Actually you have to cut 15 of those starts. After that


Dec 30, 2015, 1:35 PM [ in reply to Re: So the whole makeshift line factor kinda falls apart.*** ]

list was published, Clemson had an OL released from the team who had



wait for it






15 starts.

So negligible stat at best.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Actually you have to cut 15 of those starts. After that


Dec 30, 2015, 4:47 PM

Hey Midnight Toker I was enjoying this debate. Care to come back?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:03 PM [ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ]

Huh? Based on your chart:

Oklahoma Avg Opp Rnk: 54.9
Clemson Avg Opp Rnk: 60.9

And that conveniently omits Wofford. Galman played an extra game, so total yards isn't a fair comparison.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:07 PM

You are only reading one stat there..adjusted line yards.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:09 PM

And if you are counting that one..clemson had faced 4 in the top 20 while OU faced faced only 2.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That's right. OU didn't have a championship game.***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:09 PM [ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ]



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:28 PM [ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ]

> Huh? Based on your chart:
>
> Oklahoma Avg Opp Rnk: 54.9
> Clemson Avg Opp Rnk: 60.9
>
> And that conveniently omits Wofford. Galman played an
> extra game, so total yards isn't a fair comparison.

> Huh? Based on your chart:
>
> Oklahoma Avg Opp Rnk: 54.9
> Clemson Avg Opp Rnk: 60.9
>
> And that conveniently omits Wofford. Galman played an
> extra game, so total yards isn't a fair comparison.

Gallman sat out one of our easiest games so no he didn't play an extra game. Sorry coot

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 1:33 PM [ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ]

If I've not mistaken, I think Galman sit out the wake forest game as well.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 4:44 PM [ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ]

So what defense has he ran against?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon***


Dec 30, 2015, 12:46 PM [ in reply to Re: Perineum splits time with Mixon*** ]

and Watson

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 29
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic