Replies: 32
| visibility 3977
|
Valley Legend [12647]
TigerPulse: 72%
47
Posts: 21190
Joined: 2005
|
Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
1
1
Mar 2, 2025, 7:22 PM
|
|
The guy gets absolutely SHELLED
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1531]
TigerPulse: 99%
30
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
1
Mar 2, 2025, 7:23 PM
|
|
Maybe not but this is an overreaction 😂
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12647]
TigerPulse: 72%
47
Posts: 21190
Joined: 2005
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
1
Mar 2, 2025, 7:24 PM
|
|
Dude got rocked on Friday as well
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [1056]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
2
Mar 2, 2025, 7:30 PM
|
|
He pitched 3 scoreless innings Friday night to end the game
|
|
|
|
 |
1st Rounder [603]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [15219]
TigerPulse: 83%
50
Posts: 23641
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
2
Mar 2, 2025, 8:23 PM
|
|
47 Lucas Mahlstedt 0 . 0 0 0-0 3 0 0 0/0 3 7.2 2 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 . 0 8 0 1 2 0 0 0
that era was 0.00 for you idiots that can't read. he did give up one run tonight
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [64799]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 18669
Joined: 2020
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
3
Mar 2, 2025, 8:42 PM
|
|
Thank you for posting his numbers. He's busted his butt in the off-season changing his arm slots etc. He's good and only going to get better.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4861]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2680]
TigerPulse: 84%
33
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4861]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [122]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
Mar 2, 2025, 7:34 PM
[ in reply to Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line ] |
|
Absolutely another fan over-reacting with the “SHELLED” comment.
Was hit hard tonight, but previously some good pitching at times.
Go Tigers
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [15219]
TigerPulse: 83%
50
Posts: 23641
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
1
Mar 2, 2025, 7:25 PM
|
|
User Logo palmettoson Valley Legend [12607] TigerPulse: 72% 47 Posts: 21144 Joined: 2005 Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line Mar 2, 2025, 7:22 PM Reply
The guy gets absolutely SHELLED
good old palmetto coot
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12647]
TigerPulse: 72%
47
Posts: 21190
Joined: 2005
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
1
Mar 2, 2025, 7:26 PM
|
|
You got me.
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [32225]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 13649
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
1
Mar 2, 2025, 7:30 PM
|
|
trolls do this a lot. They really like griping about others all the time.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [60104]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 45314
Joined: 2003
|
Everytime you see a really negative post...right from the jump...you KNOW
Mar 2, 2025, 7:35 PM
|
|
before you even look it was from one of the usual suspects....
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [15219]
TigerPulse: 83%
50
Posts: 23641
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
Mar 2, 2025, 8:18 PM
[ in reply to Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line ] |
|
guess you missed the friday game huh palmetto coot. and every other game he has pitched in this year
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4930]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
That was literally just the 1st run
1
Mar 2, 2025, 7:25 PM
|
|
He gave up in the season so far...breathe dude
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12647]
TigerPulse: 72%
47
Posts: 21190
Joined: 2005
|
Re: That was literally just the 1st run
1
Mar 2, 2025, 7:27 PM
|
|
Dude gets absolutely BARRELLED when he comes in to close
|
|
|
|
 |
Dynasty Maker [3419]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: That was literally just the 1st run
Mar 2, 2025, 7:30 PM
|
|
I will keep my thoughts on this to myself until after the game because I don’t want to jinx it lol!
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [15219]
TigerPulse: 83%
50
Posts: 23641
Joined: 1998
|
Re: That was literally just the 1st run
Mar 2, 2025, 8:24 PM
|
|
hope no one actually believes palmetto coot is a tiger fan.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18534]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12087
Joined: 2007
|
Re: That was literally just the 1st run
Mar 2, 2025, 7:59 PM
[ in reply to Re: That was literally just the 1st run ] |
|
He’s appeared in 7 games so far and hasn’t been “barrelled” (unless that means pitch effectively) yet.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18534]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12087
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1531]
TigerPulse: 99%
30
|
Re: That was literally just the 1st run
1
Mar 2, 2025, 7:31 PM
[ in reply to That was literally just the 1st run ] |
|
That’s what I’m saying dude that was the first run he gave up all year with 10ks and no walks absolutely an overreaction the only thing accurate you might have said was that he’s not a closer because he might not be.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [10159]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
Mar 2, 2025, 7:30 PM
|
|
He gets them out most of the time but he is not fooling anyone…..he normally gets hit hard….and nerve wracking… hopefully we can hold em and compete the sweep!
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Protector [1441]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
Mar 2, 2025, 8:29 PM
|
|
How can you say he “normally” gets hit hard? What’s the W/L record? Who did they just sweep? I’m liking the pitching staff, and they didn’t have to go deep into the bullpen for this sweep. Not a bad indicator.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18534]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12087
Joined: 2007
|
What are you talking about?
4
Mar 2, 2025, 7:54 PM
|
|
He’s pitched 7.2 innings prior to tonight. 0.00 ERA. 2 hits. 10 strikeouts.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [2680]
TigerPulse: 84%
33
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
1
Mar 2, 2025, 7:57 PM
|
|
Idiot
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1835]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
Mar 2, 2025, 8:30 PM
|
|
I don’t think he’s a long term closer either but dudes been solid so far this year. Shelled is a major overreaction based on today even
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [15219]
TigerPulse: 83%
50
Posts: 23641
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
Mar 2, 2025, 8:56 PM
|
|
lol we have played 10 games. any number of people may end up being the closer. we got guys that have not even pitched yet. and the mot is already b!tching about something so irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4861]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
Mar 2, 2025, 8:38 PM
|
|
He didn't get shelled Friday.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1511]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
Mar 2, 2025, 8:47 PM
|
|
Another idiot to add to the idiot list.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18843]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11106
Joined: 2008
|
Mods ...
1
Mar 2, 2025, 8:51 PM
|
|
The idjit filter is broke again.
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8954]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11829
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Malhstedt is not a closer - bottom line
Mar 2, 2025, 8:52 PM
|
|
After watching the first batter he faced, I wanted him to be pulled. His pitches had no movement. It looked like he was pitching batting practice. I presume tonight was an off-night.
Hall's pitches had lots of vertical movement. I thought the coots would realize that and figure it out, but they obviously did not.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 32
| visibility 3977
|
|
|