|
Replies: 27
| visibility 2261
|
CU Guru [1356]
TigerPulse: 92%
28
|
Hypothetical... We go down to FSU undefeated and
Aug 24, 2012, 1:45 PM
|
|
we either beat them by 3 on a late field goal or they beat us by 3 on a late field goal... "Game of the Century" if played in the SEC and we both start out ranked in top 5 right?
FSU, or CU goes undefeated the rest of the way and wins the ACCCG. No team in the SEC goes undefeated and Bama or LSU wins the SEC that one loss.
Do we get a rematch of the "Game of the Century" for the MNC? Or, since Bama and/or LSU start out ranked higher and teams like USuCk are ranked when they play LSU they have an inflated SOS, and get the nod?
What's good for the Goose (SEC) is good for the Gander (Rest of us) right?
Hope that makes sense and would love to see something like that happen. The folks at ESPN would be carping themseleves!
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 26231
Joined: 2011
|
Good question.
Aug 24, 2012, 1:47 PM
|
|
But you already know the anSwE[C]r
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1848]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
If that happened to Big 10 or Big 12 yes they would probably
Aug 24, 2012, 1:48 PM
|
|
re do the game in the BCS championship. recent history wouldn't let the ACC get away with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1799]
TigerPulse: 30%
31
|
Wrong, they had a game of the century a few years back in
Aug 24, 2012, 4:07 PM
|
|
the Big 10. Ohio St. vs. Michigan, 1 vs.2, Michigan lost by 3 AT Ohio St. Instead of letting a 10-1 Michigan rematch they let an 11-2 LSU play for it. Only the SEC could get rematch. It makes me sick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [62]
TigerPulse: 27%
7
|
Re: Wrong, they had a game of the century a few years back in
Aug 24, 2012, 4:40 PM
|
|
How'd LSU do in that title game?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1848]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1848]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [62]
TigerPulse: 27%
7
|
Re: Buckeyes beat them 14-3 that year Michegan lost four games
Aug 24, 2012, 5:15 PM
|
|
Good call. She meant the year Florida beat Ohio St. That year they were 1 and 2 going into season finale and it was dubbed "Game of the Century"
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
54
Posts: 44815
Joined: 2010
|
LOL...
Aug 24, 2012, 1:56 PM
|
|
no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [931]
TigerPulse: 43%
24
|
Re: LOL...
Aug 24, 2012, 1:59 PM
|
|
not a chance ever
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6034]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
wofford...LOLOLOL***
Aug 24, 2012, 2:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1848]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
yeah I'd laugh too when a school of 1,200 students scares
Aug 24, 2012, 2:11 PM
|
|
the Bejesus out of 80,000 orange clad Tiger fans
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6034]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
citadel.....LOLOLOLOL
Aug 24, 2012, 2:14 PM
|
|
Yep, you beat USCHeat 38-35. Still have to laugh...bellhop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [931]
TigerPulse: 43%
24
|
Re: wofford...LOLOLOL***
Aug 24, 2012, 2:39 PM
[ in reply to wofford...LOLOLOL*** ] |
|
I would not trade my football program for yours straight up....EVER
Wofford with our 1500 students and our budget that equals 1% of Clemson's, accomplishes more and has been more successful at our level than Clemson.
And we do it with true student athletes, not with players that are at school only to play football.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
46
Posts: 14500
Joined: 2011
|
Re: wofford...LOLOLOL***
Aug 24, 2012, 5:11 PM
|
|
Ha ha yeah as if we'd ask for that trade. Get off our board and go talk about the southern conference. Or do you even have a board
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6034]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
wofford...LOLOLOL
Aug 24, 2012, 10:06 PM
[ in reply to Re: wofford...LOLOLOL*** ] |
|
Explain to me exactly what you have accomplished at wofford. I can see why you are called terriers. LOLOLOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7219]
TigerPulse: 70%
42
Posts: 20390
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Hypothetical... We go down to FSU undefeated and
Aug 24, 2012, 2:01 PM
|
|
They do not play hypothetical games.
FSU and /or Clemson will not go undefeated the rest of the way.
Your forgetting USC(the real USC),the team many have picked to end the dominance of the SEC in the title games.
Your forgetting Arkansas,a team many say might just end the dominance of both Bama and LSU in the SEC.
USuCk allready has an inflated ego and hasn't even played the first game.
There are no Gooses( or Geeses) in the SEC so I won't bother to take a gander at answering your hypothetical scenario.
Oh,and to H E double hockey sticks with ESPN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [62]
TigerPulse: 27%
7
|
Re: Hypothetical... We go down to FSU undefeated and
Aug 24, 2012, 2:08 PM
|
|
With a 2-13 record in the BCS, why should the ACC get treated like the SEC?
(Or Big 12, Or Big Ten, or PAC-12...or even Big East)
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
46
Posts: 14500
Joined: 2011
|
Hey what has SC done in the BCS***
Aug 24, 2012, 5:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [62]
TigerPulse: 27%
7
|
Re: Hey what has SC done in the BCS***
Aug 24, 2012, 5:16 PM
|
|
Nothing...which is why nobody is using SC as a basis for an argument. But the SEC's dominance grants them the benefit of the doubt for a rematch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [103164]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 99112
Joined: 2009
|
USCw doesn't have the depth to make it far.
Aug 24, 2012, 3:32 PM
[ in reply to Re: Hypothetical... We go down to FSU undefeated and ] |
|
They might make four or five in a row then then everybody will figure all this out.
In order to win these four or five their starters will have played so many snaps the'll look like they played 10 or 12 games without a bye week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [88888]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 81715
Joined: 1999
|
Depends on how VT, USC, and UF do since us
Aug 24, 2012, 2:08 PM
|
|
and FSU would have to play 2 of the 3. Plus, southern cal and ok could win all.
Message was edited by: josephg®
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7834]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 20499
Joined: 2004
|
NOPE
Aug 24, 2012, 2:30 PM
|
|
We aren't the almighty SEC with the power of eSECpn behind it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32952]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18481
Joined: 2008
|
Depends upon how the real USC and OU does in
Aug 24, 2012, 3:43 PM
|
|
the Big XII. Assuming one or the other ends up unbeaten or with 1 loss, they'd play in the NC against whatever team E$ECPN puts up against them. We'd be the 3-headed stepchild watching the party from outside.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5156]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
We'd go to a BCS game so it wouldn't be all bad***
Aug 24, 2012, 4:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [62]
TigerPulse: 27%
7
|
I'll ask again
Aug 24, 2012, 4:42 PM
|
|
Why would a conference that has historically been pitiful in BCS games get the same chance for a regular season rematch as conferences that have been much better and successful in BCS games?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5156]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
They wouldn't but we'd be in a BCS game not the title game***
Aug 24, 2012, 4:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21002]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 15388
Joined: 2010
|
Let's Start by Beating AUB, then SC & not give up 70 in bowl
Aug 25, 2012, 12:51 AM
|
|
Think you are getting ahead of yourself partner ... 3 new Tiger O-linemen have never played a down. Long way to go.
We will not be better than ALA, LSU, or USC this year. I hope better than SCU, Aub. FSU, Ga T. Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 27
| visibility 2261
|
|
|
50
