|
Replies: 21
| visibility 3760
|
Rock Defender [50]
TigerPulse: 75%
6
|
Gamecock rushing
2
Dec 31, 2024, 7:01 PM
|
|
How did Illinois hold SC to only 130 rushing, and we were impotent to stop them?
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9318]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
3
Dec 31, 2024, 7:02 PM
|
|
Contained LS. That's how.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [50]
TigerPulse: 75%
6
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
2
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:04 PM
|
|
Why did they do it, but we couldn’t?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1904]
TigerPulse: 85%
31
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:05 PM
|
|
Yawn
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [593]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
2
Dec 31, 2024, 7:06 PM
[ in reply to Re: Gamecock rushing ] |
|
Tackling #1. Spying #2. And the series when he got sacked, they showed an aerial view that showed all 4 receivers covered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9318]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
4
Dec 31, 2024, 7:06 PM
[ in reply to Re: Gamecock rushing ] |
|
Defensive linemen d idn't rush to sack him and held their positions while being blocked. Made him beate them with his passing
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4622]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
4
Dec 31, 2024, 7:07 PM
[ in reply to Re: Gamecock rushing ] |
|
You lost the game today, suck it up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18664]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 10928
Joined: 2016
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
Dec 31, 2024, 8:41 PM
[ in reply to Re: Gamecock rushing ] |
|
They kept Sellers in front of them and didn't go at him out of control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1428]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
1
Dec 31, 2024, 8:47 PM
[ in reply to Re: Gamecock rushing ] |
|
Edmo, you’ll need to ask Clemsons staff. Contain Sellers, contain coots. Again I say,, we didn’t, we lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2600]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
3
Dec 31, 2024, 7:11 PM
|
|
Our rush defense was abysmal this year. We let citadel put up 250+ yards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62977]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62972
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
2
Dec 31, 2024, 7:36 PM
|
|
Citadel gained 288 yards to be exact!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3129]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:23 PM
|
|
Because their coach played D line
Its similar to how we came to be known as WRU under Dabo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1822]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
3
Dec 31, 2024, 7:26 PM
|
|
Said at the time Sellers wasn’t Lamar Jackson, our (lack of) defense just made him look like it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
Did you watch this season?
3
Dec 31, 2024, 7:30 PM
|
|
Rushing defense was not our strong suit and it’s been discussed ad nauseum. We nonetheless game those losers the game.
Regardless, a loss by “the hottest team in the country” to a middling team in a meaningless bowl, now that’s embarrassing if you’re a coot. Coots just doing coot things. What a riot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2101]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Their starting RB opted out, so Im sure that had an
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:32 PM
|
|
impact. Also they contained Sellers, who had 160 rushing yards against us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4869]
TigerPulse: 95%
37
|
Scheme plus the inability to adjust the scheme as needed.***
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
It wasnt due to not trying to adjust, it was execution.
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:37 PM
|
|
Just a lack of getting off blocks and missed tackles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62977]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62972
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Scheme plus the inability to adjust the scheme as needed.***
Dec 31, 2024, 7:40 PM
[ in reply to Scheme plus the inability to adjust the scheme as needed.*** ] |
|
Our inability to adjust nothing on the defensive side of the ball. They could stop the game at half time, come back the next day and saw the very same defense that we saw the day before!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62977]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62972
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:35 PM
|
|
The last that I checked, Goodwin only coaches the defense at Clemson. If he would have been the coach at Illinois, they would have given up a ton of yardage just like we did!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9472]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
Dec 31, 2024, 7:35 PM
|
|
Simple. Wesley Eugene Goodwin!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20539]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
2
Dec 31, 2024, 7:38 PM
|
|
We couldn’t stop the citadel 288 yards later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20878]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14655
Joined: 2009
|
Adaway #27 for them looks pretty legit.
Dec 31, 2024, 8:47 PM
|
|
Freshman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 3760
|
|
|
50
