|
Replies: 21
| visibility 3752
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 73%
6
|
Gamecock rushing
2
Dec 31, 2024, 7:01 PM
|
|
How did Illinois hold SC to only 130 rushing, and we were impotent to stop them?
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9872]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
3
Dec 31, 2024, 7:02 PM
|
|
Contained LS. That's how.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 73%
6
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
2
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:04 PM
|
|
Why did they do it, but we couldn’t?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2538]
TigerPulse: 85%
32
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:05 PM
|
|
Yawn
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1658]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
2
Dec 31, 2024, 7:06 PM
[ in reply to Re: Gamecock rushing ] |
|
Tackling #1. Spying #2. And the series when he got sacked, they showed an aerial view that showed all 4 receivers covered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9872]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
4
Dec 31, 2024, 7:06 PM
[ in reply to Re: Gamecock rushing ] |
|
Defensive linemen d idn't rush to sack him and held their positions while being blocked. Made him beate them with his passing
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4911]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
4
Dec 31, 2024, 7:07 PM
[ in reply to Re: Gamecock rushing ] |
|
You lost the game today, suck it up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20614]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11151
Joined: 2016
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
Dec 31, 2024, 8:41 PM
[ in reply to Re: Gamecock rushing ] |
|
They kept Sellers in front of them and didn't go at him out of control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1646]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
1
Dec 31, 2024, 8:47 PM
[ in reply to Re: Gamecock rushing ] |
|
Edmo, you’ll need to ask Clemsons staff. Contain Sellers, contain coots. Again I say,, we didn’t, we lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3319]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
3
Dec 31, 2024, 7:11 PM
|
|
Our rush defense was abysmal this year. We let citadel put up 250+ yards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64690]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 63904
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
2
Dec 31, 2024, 7:36 PM
|
|
Citadel gained 288 yards to be exact!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4552]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:23 PM
|
|
Because their coach played D line
Its similar to how we came to be known as WRU under Dabo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2290]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
3
Dec 31, 2024, 7:26 PM
|
|
Said at the time Sellers wasn’t Lamar Jackson, our (lack of) defense just made him look like it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
Did you watch this season?
3
Dec 31, 2024, 7:30 PM
|
|
Rushing defense was not our strong suit and it’s been discussed ad nauseum. We nonetheless game those losers the game.
Regardless, a loss by “the hottest team in the country” to a middling team in a meaningless bowl, now that’s embarrassing if you’re a coot. Coots just doing coot things. What a riot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2867]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
Their starting RB opted out, so Im sure that had an
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:32 PM
|
|
impact. Also they contained Sellers, who had 160 rushing yards against us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4886]
TigerPulse: 96%
37
|
Scheme plus the inability to adjust the scheme as needed.***
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
It wasnt due to not trying to adjust, it was execution.
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:37 PM
|
|
Just a lack of getting off blocks and missed tackles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64690]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 63904
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Scheme plus the inability to adjust the scheme as needed.***
Dec 31, 2024, 7:40 PM
[ in reply to Scheme plus the inability to adjust the scheme as needed.*** ] |
|
Our inability to adjust nothing on the defensive side of the ball. They could stop the game at half time, come back the next day and saw the very same defense that we saw the day before!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64690]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 63904
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
1
Dec 31, 2024, 7:35 PM
|
|
The last that I checked, Goodwin only coaches the defense at Clemson. If he would have been the coach at Illinois, they would have given up a ton of yardage just like we did!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11908]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
Dec 31, 2024, 7:35 PM
|
|
Simple. Wesley Eugene Goodwin!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22103]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
Re: Gamecock rushing
2
Dec 31, 2024, 7:38 PM
|
|
We couldn’t stop the citadel 288 yards later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21266]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14879
Joined: 2009
|
Adaway #27 for them looks pretty legit.
Dec 31, 2024, 8:47 PM
|
|
Freshman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 3752
|
|
|
50
