|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1001
|
National Champion [7864]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
ACC Talent Rankings
10
10
May 4, 2023, 2:00 PM
|
|
So far... (based off the amount of top 1000, 4 stars, and 5 stars from recruiting + portal)
Clemson - 104.00
Miami - 91.50
North Carolina - 84.50
Florida State - 83.00
*South Carolina - 79.50*
Georgia Tech - 64.50
NC State - 63.00
Pittsburg - 56.00
Louisville - 55.00
Virginia Tech - 53.00
Boston College - 49.50
Duke - 41.50
Virginia - 37.00
Wake Forest - 28.00
Syracuse - 21.00
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Spirit [9232]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
4
May 4, 2023, 2:41 PM
|
|
But Florida State is supposed to be loaded?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2374]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
4
May 4, 2023, 3:15 PM
|
|
But Florida State is supposed to be loaded?!
This might show their first string is highly rated, which is what everyone sees (media included), but there is a dropoff on their 2nd and 3rd string. Maybe...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31581]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 13483
Joined: 1998
|
This is what bretfsu has been stating
1
May 4, 2023, 4:29 PM
|
|
They were missing depth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [6052]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Exactly
May 4, 2023, 7:25 PM
[ in reply to Re: ACC Talent Rankings ] |
|
High transfer portal use results in "on-paper" front line talent, but you create depth through recruiting and player development. Kids don't transfer to sit on the bench.
Great post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10993]
TigerPulse: 61%
45
Posts: 14038
Joined: 2006
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
1
1
May 4, 2023, 4:35 PM
[ in reply to Re: ACC Talent Rankings ] |
|
Stars are to look at in the sky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3415]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
I wonder...
1
May 4, 2023, 3:10 PM
|
|
how this would have looked prior to the 2015 season 2015?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3415]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4990]
TigerPulse: 98%
37
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
1
May 4, 2023, 3:12 PM
|
|
And they’ve got FSU #3 for what reason? Their Cheez-It bowl and Clemson loss last year must’ve done it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7864]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
May 4, 2023, 7:00 PM
|
|
Hype. That’s all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8457]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
1
May 4, 2023, 3:56 PM
|
|
nice inf Leon, do you know how we rank nationally?
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7864]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
May 4, 2023, 7:00 PM
|
|
Probably top 5 if I had to guess
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1837]
TigerPulse: 88%
31
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
May 5, 2023, 8:40 PM
|
|
top 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7864]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
May 6, 2023, 9:46 AM
|
|
There’s no doubt about that.
UGA, Bama, and Ohio State are more talented than Clemson. But I’m not so sure anyone else is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [68502]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 24869
Joined: 2011
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
May 4, 2023, 6:41 PM
|
|
Looks good to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7864]
TigerPulse: 99%
42
|
Re: ACC Talent Rankings
May 4, 2023, 8:25 PM
|
|
Looks really bad for Tony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1001
|
|
|
50
