|
Replies: 14
| visibility 2352
|
Orange Blooded [2330]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Onside kick - freeze frame
Dec 6, 2015, 1:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Can any of you say for certain that no part of the UNC players' bodies are in the neutral zone? Me either. Who had the best view? Would anyone benefit from generating controversy over this call (cough-ESPN-cough)?
Perfectly reasonable to me for the ref to throw the flag.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [7099]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Onside kick - freeze frame
Dec 6, 2015, 1:06 AM
|
|
Looks to me that everyone has their feet well behind the line, unless the kicker(s) did something funny, it was a bad call.
I still dont think they score and make a 2pt to tie it though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2330]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Agreed about their feet, but how about their helmets?
Dec 6, 2015, 1:09 AM
|
|
They can't be in the neutral zone at all -- no part of their bodies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [51]
TigerPulse: 100%
6
|
Re: Onside kick - freeze frame
Dec 6, 2015, 1:15 AM
[ in reply to Re: Onside kick - freeze frame ] |
|
Parallax much? Can't use that angle to prove he wasn't off sides. Only one guy saw it and made the call
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5539]
TigerPulse: 88%
38
|
Re: Onside kick - freeze frame
Dec 6, 2015, 1:16 AM
[ in reply to Re: Onside kick - freeze frame ] |
|
I think it was a bad call and I think they do score. Our defense turned into a #### in yhe 4th quarter. They fcked us. Been fcking us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2425]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Onside kick - freeze frame
Dec 6, 2015, 1:19 AM
|
|
Someone on twitter said that you have to have at least 4 players on either side of the kicker and when the fake kicker made his move it left on only 3 on the far side of the field, which triggered the penalty.
Can anyone else confirm this rule and that is was true tonite?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5539]
TigerPulse: 88%
38
|
Re: Onside kick - freeze frame
Dec 6, 2015, 1:21 AM
|
|
There was 4 on the far side, 2 in the middle, and 5 of those little lucky blue queers at the bottom.
What's embarrassing is that it hit Mark Fields right in the fckn chest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1255]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
kickers foot crossed the line
Dec 6, 2015, 1:09 AM
|
|
Before he kicked the ball ....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2277]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: kickers foot crossed the line
Dec 6, 2015, 1:10 AM
|
|
the plant foot doesnt count. Secondly the helmet closest to the ref is across the line. that's who he threw the flag at...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1255]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: kickers foot crossed the line
Dec 6, 2015, 1:12 AM
|
|
Yeah but if his leg was in motion and if he passed the ball as if he missed would it matter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1255]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: kickers foot crossed the line
Dec 6, 2015, 1:14 AM
|
|
Just curious... But all I can say is the ref must have been watching shadows
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11463]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 11227
Joined: 2007
|
LOL. No. Kicker can't be offsides.***
Dec 6, 2015, 1:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [6]
TigerPulse: 68%
1
|
Re: Onside kick - freeze frame
Dec 6, 2015, 1:09 AM
|
|
30's right foot is over the line in that pic.
His shoulders and above are beyond that foot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17204]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 17030
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Onside kick - freeze frame
Dec 6, 2015, 1:12 AM
|
|
From that angle hard to tell. The best view was from the ref who threw the flag
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [555]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: Onside kick - freeze frame
Dec 6, 2015, 1:27 AM
|
|
Dude. You need to charge your phone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 2352
|
|
|
50
