|
Replies: 16
| visibility 53
|
Orange Blooded [2505]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Message removed by Author
Dec 30, 2022, 11:50 PM
|
|
Message removed by Author
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [29930]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 12880
Joined: 1998
|
it'd been way worse with dju
Dec 30, 2022, 11:53 PM
|
|
at the helm.. the awful OL play wouldn't play into dju's 'strength's' LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7564]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
you think Cade looked worse than DJ?
Dec 30, 2022, 11:53 PM
|
|
lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2273]
TigerPulse: 96%
32
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 30, 2022, 11:58 PM
|
|
Cade played a decent ballgame. This offense is messed up and Cade did better tonight than DJ would have...by a long shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7680]
TigerPulse: 95%
42
Posts: 13208
Joined: 1999
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 30, 2022, 11:58 PM
|
|
cade is 4x the qb dj ever was
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4867]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 30, 2022, 11:58 PM
|
|
I'd rather lose with Cade than watch DJ stare down one receiver and run like he has on concrete shoes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 30, 2022, 11:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [-94]
TigerPulse: 68%
-1
|
If you can’t see the difference, I’m not even gonna waste my time. Trying to educate you.
Dec 31, 2022, 12:01 AM
|
|
Because you are clearly someone that doesn’t know a #### thing about football.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: If you can’t see the difference, I’m not even gonna waste my time. Trying to educate you.
Dec 31, 2022, 12:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4867]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 31, 2022, 12:02 AM
[ in reply to Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight? ] |
|
I'm not a mathematician but I'm pretty sure 55% is higher than the 28% DJ showed us against SCU.
Also, we had seen DJ for two years doing the same thing over and over. Cade at least brings a fresh face and a different set of skills.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 31, 2022, 12:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6782]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 31, 2022, 12:00 AM
|
|
I think we would have been looking at our first 12 sack allowed game if #5 had played. Definitely wouldn’t have had 30 first downs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [762]
TigerPulse: 97%
22
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 31, 2022, 12:00 AM
|
|
Bwahahahaha. The result was the same on the scoreboard because special teams and defense #### the bed. Our offense was far more productive, but red zone play calling was hot garbage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [347]
TigerPulse: 96%
15
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 31, 2022, 12:00 AM
|
|
With DJ we would have only run 40 plays and scored zero points. It would have been a bloodbath tonight. UT would have been the ones to run 100 plays and our D would have literally collapsed. I mean even more than it did in the 4Q tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4605]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 31, 2022, 12:01 AM
|
|
In the first half, Cade completed 4x as many passes as DJ did in the whole game against the coots. DJ is still a bad QB, just no longer our problem. Cade played fine, his team and coaches did not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21625]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
big stinko is someone else's problem now
Dec 31, 2022, 12:03 AM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [20]
TigerPulse: 50%
3
|
Re: Where are all the DJ haters tonight?
Dec 31, 2022, 12:04 AM
|
|
Had DJ stated Clemson wouldn’t have scored at all. So the “haters” are correct.
The real question is why on earth are you bringing DJ? He’s done and gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 53
|
|
|
50
