|
Replies: 26
| visibility 665
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46734
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 12:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [3677]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Wake at 10 seems odd. I thought they had a bunch of
Jan 9, 2022, 12:52 PM
|
|
5-6 year players last season: Not to mention their defense was well below average. Surprised Klatt has us in his top 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24579]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 14498
Joined: 2013
|
Yeah, find me a Vegas O/U where they have WF at 10 wins or more…
Jan 9, 2022, 12:59 PM
|
|
And I’ll GLADLY bet the under in a heartbeat.
~JKB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3382]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1811]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Wake at 10 seems odd. I thought they had a bunch of
Jan 9, 2022, 1:04 PM
[ in reply to Wake at 10 seems odd. I thought they had a bunch of ] |
|
With DJ5 or Cade at QB, we should win the ACC and beat ND on the road.
We can end up in the top 4. The SEC WILL NOT have 3 of the top 4.
A&M and Georgia will choke during the season..
Dabo will start the QB that gives Clemson the best chance to win.
We will have a significantly better Offense and a good Defense next year.
Special Teams should be good as well!
Go Tigers, Wreck Tech!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10900]
TigerPulse: 60%
45
Posts: 13962
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Wake at 10 seems odd. I thought they had a bunch of
Jan 9, 2022, 3:13 PM
|
|
Beating Notre Dame will be a tough get and will determine whether we have any chance at the Playoffs if we take care of the other 11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [438]
TigerPulse: 88%
17
|
Re: Wake at 10 seems odd. I thought they had a bunch of
Jan 10, 2022, 4:00 PM
[ in reply to Re: Wake at 10 seems odd. I thought they had a bunch of ] |
|
I was just telling someone that Jimbo Fisher can have 30 5 stars and still lose 3 or 4 games a year. People forget he had top 3 recruiting classes at FSU and would still lose 3 games a year (except when he won with Jameis). He gets outcoached all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6693]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 1:05 PM
|
|
Good. I prefer it that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1548]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 10, 2022, 4:54 PM
|
|
Agree. Over the course of the season, we'll move up if we take care of business. There are always upsets. Let's hope Clemson doesn't experience one...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6693]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 1:08 PM
|
|
Why do they think Texas A&M will be so good? They were 8-4 last year. It can't be because of this last recruiting class. If it is, they shouldn't be ranked that high. Maybe the following year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [387]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 1:13 PM
|
|
Joel Klatt hates Clemson, so I am surprised he has us in the top 10. I think he is still upset over the 44-16 beat down game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [79000]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 120396
Joined: 1998
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 1:16 PM
|
|
it is always too early to care what that biased bozo thinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [855]
TigerPulse: 92%
23
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 1:26 PM
|
|
I would not rank us that high until I see us get the QB situation fixed. I am hopeful but need to see it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6794]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 1:42 PM
|
|
Ditto this^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [42282]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 18891
Joined: 2015
|
This is great news! Dabo feels slightly disrespected. Book your
Jan 9, 2022, 2:08 PM
|
|
Reservations now! Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6933]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Yep, back on the ROY bus - Dabo at his
Jan 9, 2022, 3:03 PM
|
|
best!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2368]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: This is great news! Dabo feels slightly disrespected. Book your
Jan 10, 2022, 9:20 AM
[ in reply to This is great news! Dabo feels slightly disrespected. Book your ] |
|
Why would he feel disrespected? We are coming off a ranking of 15-20, lost both coordinators, don't have any proven offensive unit other than RB, lost our starting DB's, and our defensive leader on the field. It shows a heck of a lot of respect for us to be anywhere in the top 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1223]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: Agree 100%
Jan 10, 2022, 12:24 PM
|
|
I honestly wouldn't put us in top 10. Top 15 MAYBE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7737]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 2:38 PM
|
|
Until we prove we have a QB I wouldn't put us in the top 10 either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6933]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Who cares what you
Jan 9, 2022, 3:05 PM
|
|
think! We are at a great place at QB, whoever wins the QB battle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20939]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 15357
Joined: 2010
|
Seriously Clarke?
Jan 9, 2022, 7:18 PM
|
|
Based on what empirical data is Clemson in great shape with no changes at QB with a 106 out of 109 QB rating in 2021?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [259]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 2:59 PM
|
|
Aggie football lol. Didn’t they lose their qb? Stopped reading after that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10900]
TigerPulse: 60%
45
Posts: 13962
Joined: 2006
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 3:10 PM
|
|
As always, rankings make no difference until the 1st Sunday of December. I think Pre-season 6th would be generous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2160]
TigerPulse: 99%
32
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Jan 9, 2022, 3:23 PM
|
|
I like Joel Klatt, this is as good as anything but Michigan loses some key players to the draft and may not have the same level of play behind them...
Clemson; like every team in the list will have to earn their way into the top 4....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4611]
TigerPulse: 62%
37
|
I’m fine with a potential #6 ranking.
Jan 9, 2022, 4:46 PM
|
|
Shows the we still have respect and they noticed what we did since that Pitt loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [86205]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 38972
Joined: 2003
|
It's all about the clicks, man. Some of these sports yobbos
Jan 10, 2022, 12:28 PM
|
|
say and do stupid stuff just to drive up ratings. However, in this case, #6, with our only "proven" QB being near the bottom of the barrel in a whole bunch of stats, is actually pretty generous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3471]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: TNET: Clemson outside top-5 of FOX analyst 'too early' 2022 rankings
Oct 18, 2022, 10:16 AM
|
|
Wake Forest and Arkansas? Top ten? Really?
I thought Wake was about to lose a lot of seniors(?) and Arkansas stopped impressing me after their third game last season. Maybe Mr. Klatt is playing the controversy/click-bait game rather than doing what he is supposedly payed to do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 26
| visibility 665
|
|
|
50
