Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Replies: 13
| visibility 965

Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking


Apr 5, 2025, 8:07 AM
Reply

at real wage growth over the last 70 years, real wages moved up with productivity in the post-war era until the 1970s/80s. Then productivity leapt upward and wages went on a very modest growth track as manufacturing left, efficiencies in domestic production grew, and the economy shifted to be more service base. Manufacturing dropped from 20% of the economy to 8%. The higher wage earners have seen their paychecks increase, where the lower earners have seen theirs essentially flatline.

SO - if the goal is to bring back manufacturing, what type of manufacturing do we want? I go into plants all the time - Bosch, BMW, Volvo, all sorts of auto suppliers, defense suppliers, etc. These places are great - big, beautiful buildings - with technicians who make good $. My Clemson roommate is in HR at a plant, and shares starting wages for entry level workers. They make more than A LOT of Clemson grads, the company pays for tech school, and they set the workers up for financial success especially when you consider no school loans. The problem I see in my small sample size is that there just aren't many people who run those factories. Maybe at places like Ryobi, I see lots of people in cubes reconditioning returned hand tools, but I'm not sure building/refurbishing factories to make, say, stainless steel castings will move the needle much.

It feels like the system we have now is American exceptionalism where the most educated are making more, and we're exporting the crappy jobs like stitching Nike emblems on Pegasus shoes. The middle class has been gutted as a function of technology and competition, and those folks either switch to new fields or they get left behind in the old mill towns. I thought exceptionalism is what we wanted, otherwise we're just subsidizing mediocrity.

SO - the question is: if Trump's plan works, what manufacturing gets brought back here? If we bring back ALL of the plants that went overseas in the 70s/80s, do those plants have 1/4 of the workers that they had 50 years ago due to efficiency gains?

I don't see where the workers come from to fill these new factories if unemployment is low. Gov't welfare programs would need to be adjusted to push people to work more. This would be part of an overall comprehensive plan that I can't see just yet.

Please someone who is on board with the push to MAWA, lmk how this should work. Thanks.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking

1

Apr 5, 2025, 9:12 AM
Reply

Manufacturing is not coming back here, at least not in any meaningful sense. People do not want these jobs any more than they do the days of climbing into a coal mine and dying at age 38. Automation took most of the jobs, and that will not change.

My advice is to become an electrician if you do not have a college degree, there will be plenty of work.

2025 free_orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking


Apr 5, 2025, 1:22 PM
Reply

Lots of trades pay better than those degree jobs. I had a discussion with an engineer at Boeing, he was a floor mechanic and was complaining he made less as an engineer. I explained a degree never promised more money, just a less physical demanding job.

A&P mechanics make $80k plus, many jobs work 1 week on 1 week off, some are 2 and 2.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking


Apr 5, 2025, 1:27 PM
Reply

Work at a hospital based aircraft and you basically make your own schedule, work only the amount of hours needed to take care of the ship. Heck, I did it after I retired, hospital ship, worked an average of 2 hours a day and got paid for 40. Retiring at 55 was just too young, too many hours in a week to play golf or be on the lake. Fully retired at 63.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking


Apr 5, 2025, 1:29 PM [ in reply to Re: Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking ]
Reply

If you believe Bill Gates then a job you need to lay hands on to accomplish is the best career to join. He says AI is gonna replace a bunch of, read an article 40%050% of jobs are in danger.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You hit the nail on the head. Cut welfare. Unemployment numbers


Apr 5, 2025, 10:37 AM
Reply

only count people looking for work. There are 10's of millions of people doing nothing.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You hit the nail on the head. Cut welfare. Unemployment numbers


Apr 5, 2025, 1:22 PM
Reply

Yeah, they are mostly retired like me. I do plenty so i resent that statement, someone has to play golf and jets the lakes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If the goal is for the US to be treated fairly AND to get our debt squared away,


Apr 5, 2025, 1:33 PM [ in reply to You hit the nail on the head. Cut welfare. Unemployment numbers ]
Reply

then SS, Medicaid, Medicare, along with welfare, will need to be cut. We cannot cut taxes as proposed, although I personally think this tariff hubbub is what the revenue boosting action is about (although it will generate only half of the $ that the proposed tax cuts will remove).

I wish the president was able to come out with a clear plan with multiple fronts. Right now, they are still acting like middle schoolers, although their math is stuck roughly in the 4th grade.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The goal is not bringing back American jobs.


Apr 5, 2025, 10:53 AM
Reply

The goal is control. The tariffs Trump implemented make no sense because it’s not an economic policy, it’s a political policy. Now Trump will have businesses and industries coming to him and pledging support of him and his agenda, and give him concessions in return for lowering the tariffs or giving them a carve out. All of this is in service of grabbing more power.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking


Apr 5, 2025, 11:01 AM
Reply

It's an interesting take, but it overlooks a few things. The manufacturing jobs left in the ’70s and ’80s aren’t returning in the same form due to factory automation. Also, tariffs will cause inflation that can hurt more than help without a larger strategy, which I don't feel confident this administration has. I mean, shoot, they calculated "tariffs against the USA" like a fifth grader.

Besides, with unemployment already at 4%, where exactly do we find the workers to fill these new factories?

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking


Apr 5, 2025, 11:23 AM
Reply

It's like Keowee said, cut off the government benefits for 18 to 55 year old adults that are physically able and there will be plenty of workers. Over 40 million "able bodied" adults are on welfare draining $Billions from the tax payers. Time to pay the piper and go to work.

https://thefga.org/research/universal-work-requirements/#:~:text=An%20estimated%2040%20million%20able,now%20enrolled%20in%20the%20program.&text=Likewise%2C%20food%20stamps%20have%20increased,at%20the%20beginning%20of%202023.

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I say we cut all those free loading grandpas off social security***

3

Apr 5, 2025, 12:49 PM
Reply



tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I am sure conservative think tanks will say....


Apr 5, 2025, 3:18 PM [ in reply to Re: Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking ]
Reply

..“just make everyone on welfare work,” like that’ll fix everything. But here’s the thing, most folks on programs like Medicaid are already working or have legit reasons they can’t (sick, caregiving, school, etc.).

Work requirements don’t magically create jobs, they kick people off help when they mess up paperwork. It's more red tape, not real solutions.

https://kffhealthnews.org/news/article/medicaid-work-requirements-states-revamp-trump-administration/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No doubt. The makeup of the economy, workforce, and education has changed, and

1

Apr 5, 2025, 1:39 PM [ in reply to Re: Trying to see the long view ...question for the economists here. In looking ]
Reply

the administration is trying to eliminate the last 40 years of world trade that we essentially created. Maybe there some way this works if unemployment is 12%, workers are willing to work for much less, Labor in southeast asia gets expensive, and the government gets housing supply back to where it needs to be to lower prices.

Good luck, I guess.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 13
| visibility 965
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic