Replies: 96
| visibility 2291
|
Orange Blooded [3821]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 1:15 PM
|
|
I'll start: For
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5643]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
Posts: 11982
Joined: 2002
|
For***
May 21, 2012, 1:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Beast [6290]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
I'm for whatever is best for Clemson
May 21, 2012, 1:20 PM
|
|
I'll be honest: I want Clemson in the SEC. That's not going to happen.
So, after that, I would like the ACC to stay intact-- with FSU and Clemson. It makes way more sense than going to the Big 12.
However, if it looks like the ACC is going to crumble and FSU, UNC, Va Tech, etc. look elsewhere, then I hope Clemson is proactive and gets out to a more stable situaton.
The last thing I want is to be stuck in an 8-team ACC without Va Tech, UNC, FSU, and whoever else. That would be really, really bad.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [19353]
TigerPulse: 92%
52
Posts: 22266
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 1:16 PM
|
|
For.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18156]
TigerPulse: 94%
52
Posts: 28094
Joined: 2003
|
For leaving ACC...***
May 21, 2012, 1:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
MVP [518]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
For***
May 21, 2012, 1:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4811]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Fore***
May 21, 2012, 1:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [5249]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Four
May 21, 2012, 1:17 PM
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [105932]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2008
|
Fior***
May 21, 2012, 1:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4811]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
4***
May 21, 2012, 2:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
ACC leadership (lack thereof) has made it pretty simple...
May 21, 2012, 1:18 PM
|
|
Let's get the heck out of this dying conference.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
i'll be in atlanta on 9/1 cheering for clemson against
May 21, 2012, 1:20 PM
|
|
that riff raff from awbarn.
if they put big12ish on the field along with sec, that's fine.
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [32889]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18445
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 1:20 PM
|
|
Reluctantly for. Bear Bryant said it best: "A chemistry experiment won't bring in 80,000 people." As much as I like the academic tradition of the ACC, the reality is it's no longer viable from a $$$/BCS standpoint if we want to think about a football NC.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3821]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Pt. for quoting the Bear***
May 21, 2012, 1:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18156]
TigerPulse: 94%
52
Posts: 28094
Joined: 2003
|
That was pre-Swofford though...***
May 21, 2012, 1:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
:-) seriously, what must be going thru his mind with all
May 21, 2012, 1:38 PM
|
|
of this 'turmoil'? i know we like to throw barbs at him, it's good sport, but he's got to be churning inside at the possibilities?
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18156]
TigerPulse: 94%
52
Posts: 28094
Joined: 2003
|
He doesn't have time to worry...He's sending Chad's resume
May 21, 2012, 1:48 PM
|
|
out to schools in other conferences...
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [117416]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
father knows best...***
May 21, 2012, 1:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18156]
TigerPulse: 94%
52
Posts: 28094
Joined: 2003
|
Hey...that Chads a cat...He's gonna land on his feet...***
May 21, 2012, 1:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18156]
TigerPulse: 94%
52
Posts: 28094
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [16609]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 17988
Joined: 1999
|
Against. ******
May 21, 2012, 1:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
54
Posts: 44815
Joined: 2010
|
For, as long as UNC comes, too.
May 21, 2012, 1:22 PM
|
|
Don't want to lose that rivalry.
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [43126]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43554
Joined: 1998
|
For as long as Duke, Unc, Uva, are required to stay in the
May 21, 2012, 1:26 PM
|
|
ACC
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20185]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
4
May 21, 2012, 1:23 PM
|
|
for, four,fore
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1321]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
For!
May 21, 2012, 1:23 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
 |
All-American [583]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Emphatically for.**
May 21, 2012, 1:24 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Sports Icon [59224]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 45059
Joined: 2003
|
For.***
May 21, 2012, 1:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [891]
TigerPulse: 89%
23
|
For***
May 21, 2012, 1:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [247]
TigerPulse: 33%
13
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 1:26 PM
|
|
doesn't matter. it isn't happening.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
and the door won't hit me in the @$$ as i leave
May 21, 2012, 1:26 PM
|
|
ok,for.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rooter [225]
TigerPulse: 37%
13
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 1:27 PM
|
|
FOR IT ALL THE WAY!
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1071]
TigerPulse: 94%
25
|
I am Against, Undecided, Leaning For, and Strongly For
May 21, 2012, 1:27 PM
|
|
I am against going to the Big 12 alone; I am undecided about going to the Big 12 only with FSU; I am leaning for going to the Big 12 with FSU and Ga Tech; I am strongly for going to the Big 12 with FSU, Ga Tech and at least one other school (Va Tech and/or Miami).
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Cub [13]
TigerPulse: 61%
2
|
Re: I am Against, Undecided, Leaning For, and Strongly For
May 21, 2012, 1:30 PM
|
|
^^^^AGREE^^^^^
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
 |
Walk-On [100]
TigerPulse: 94%
11
|
Quatro******
May 21, 2012, 1:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1518]
TigerPulse: 92%
30
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 1:31 PM
|
|
As a long time member of IPTAY, and graduate of CU it is hard for me to see how it would make a run at another National Championship easier. If money could buy a NC, then ND should be winning it every year. We should not be making our opinions based on esecpn's opinion of the ACC. We need to take care of business on the field and everything else will work out. If the move is made, don't look for another NC or even conference championship in your lifetime.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3350]
TigerPulse: 97%
34
|
Wow. Like the confidence.
May 21, 2012, 2:02 PM
|
|
What you are failing to realize is that our ability to recruit is largely driven by our TV contract and that the chances for championships hinges greatly on whether or not we are going to be in one of the four superconfernces. If the ACC is left in the dust it will be the equivilant of trying to win the SoCon championship.
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4370]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Fourreee***
May 21, 2012, 1:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [760]
TigerPulse: 85%
22
|
after much thought...Im For....Lets GO!***
May 21, 2012, 1:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1617]
TigerPulse: 93%
31
|
For
May 21, 2012, 1:36 PM
|
|
+1
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Sports Icon [55381]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2004
|
Get away from Swofford and Tobacco road? FOR.***
May 21, 2012, 1:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3456]
TigerPulse: 79%
34
|
For***
May 21, 2012, 1:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Head Coach [767]
TigerPulse: 99%
22
|
For***
May 21, 2012, 1:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Dynasty Maker [3506]
TigerPulse: 90%
34
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 1:38 PM
|
|
FOUR !!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Conqueror [11115]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13631
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 1:38 PM
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1626]
TigerPulse: 95%
31
|
Re: For***
May 21, 2012, 1:38 PM
|
|
For
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
For ... IF FSU is going as well and it' part of a Big12 move
May 21, 2012, 1:39 PM
|
|
to create a 14 team super conference with east/west divisions.
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12210]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 12754
Joined: 1999
|
You sunk my battleship***
May 21, 2012, 1:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6694]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
It's kind of like being in a prison shower...
May 21, 2012, 1:42 PM
|
|
you know either way it's not going to be ideal, but atleast the Big 12 would be able to offer us more protection in the yard.
|
|
|
|
 |
Recruit [101]
TigerPulse: 94%
11
|
Against...its stupid.
May 21, 2012, 1:43 PM
|
|
OU National Champion winner UT National Champion Winner TCU National Champion Winner
Maryland National Champion Winner Ga Tech National Champion Winner Pitt National Champion Winner Syracuse National Champion Winner Clemson National Champion Winner Miami National Champion Winner FSU National Champion Winner
Duke Football > Kansas Football Wake Forest Football > Baylor Football UVA Football > Texas Tech football NCSU Football > Okie State Football UNC Football > WVa Football Va. Tech > everyone in their conference not named OU or UT Iowa State? Really, do I even need to name a program in the ACC ahead of them?
-If it really is all about TV markets, there is NO conference with more eyes to watch the product than the ACC. -Based on the above, there is ZERO way a conference with Va Tech, Miami, FSU, Clemson, and ALL the east coast gets left out -Again based on the above, had Miami, FSU, Clemson, among others not had subpar decades, the ACC would have again been the MOST LUCRATIVE conference. -Miami was down in the '90s and supposedly finished...they will be back. -Money may be different NOW, but with $20mm buyout, it can't be much. -Where does Clemson get the Buyout money? -Nebraska...one of the Top 5 College Football programs OF ALL TIME left after 70 years of being a part of this group because of Texas. Let THAT one sink in. NEBRASKA. -Once one steps away from the ledge, you see that the ACC may not be the most football oriented, but it's jsut as much football oriented as the Big 12... -How long does one really think a 4 team playoff lasts before its an 8 team one? -If money is indeed the reason and differentiator among teams, please explain University of Texas the last few years and Boise State? TCU pre big 12 invite? Miami during their Independent and Big East days? Notre Dame currently down?
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [247]
TigerPulse: 33%
13
|
Re: Against...its stupid.
May 21, 2012, 1:54 PM
|
|
finally, a man with some sense. the acc's powers (FSU, miami) may currently be down, but when they are back to join clemson and va tech, the conference will be relevant again. add in notre dame, and heck, they might still suck for awhile, but people will be watching. GO TIGERS!
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3821]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
I bet you guys wanted CTB to stay another 8 years as well***
May 21, 2012, 1:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Conference [405]
TigerPulse: 89%
17
|
Re: Against...its stupid.
May 21, 2012, 1:55 PM
[ in reply to Re: Against...its stupid. ] |
|
You're living in fantasyland. How's the weather? VT is as good as gone. FSU, gone. The ACC is dead.
|
|
|
|
 |
Recruit [101]
TigerPulse: 94%
11
|
FSU talks a big game for one that is freaking out over...
May 21, 2012, 2:06 PM
|
|
Their loss of $2.5mm last year. So where the hell are they gonna get $20mm to get out?
So they have not been good steward's of their money, and now they are blaming it on everyone else?
FSU hates UNC and their running of the conference? -NEBRASKA left the conference they helped found! Nebraska has WAYYYYY more tradition of football success than FSU has ever dreamed of. Nebraska left because of Texas.
However, nice slamming me with your witty fantasyland comment based on my differeing opinion of yours on a post that was asking for differing opinions.
And as the old quote goes, "Reports of the ACC's death were greatly exagerated..."
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [69764]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90816
Joined: 2001
|
Nebraska didn't leave because of Texas.
May 21, 2012, 2:36 PM
|
|
Nebraska left because the Big 10 offered them a much more lucrative compensation package.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [26673]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 15388
Joined: 2000
|
The problem with your stance is by the time this happens
May 21, 2012, 4:03 PM
[ in reply to Re: Against...its stupid. ] |
|
deals will be inked on what happened now, not in the future.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-American [583]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Are you employed by the ACC?
May 21, 2012, 1:59 PM
[ in reply to Against...its stupid. ] |
|
Duke football better than Kansas? UNC better than WVU?
Please stop.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [69764]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90816
Joined: 2001
|
Dude ...are you serious !?!?!?! Really !?!?!?!
May 21, 2012, 2:05 PM
[ in reply to Against...its stupid. ] |
|
Duke Football > Kansas Football Wake Forest Football > Baylor Football UVA Football > Texas Tech football NCSU Football > Okie State Football UNC Football > WVa Football
Just in the last five years, Kansas has a combined record of 30-32 compared to Duke's record of 16-44
Wake has a combined record of 28-32 compared ot Baylor's record of 28-34
UVA has a combined reocrd of 29-33 compared to Texas Tech's record of 42-22
NC State has a combined record of 33-30 compared to OSU's record of 48-17
UNC has a combined record of 35-29 compared to WVU's record of 48-17.
Clemson was 41-26 over that same period.
|
|
|
|
 |
Recruit [101]
TigerPulse: 94%
11
|
Credit to you for going back more than last just last year..
May 21, 2012, 2:13 PM
|
|
Like most folks are thinking. My comparisons are based on 10-20 or so years...
figure 10 years and Wake gets to take advantage of the 2006 season as Baylor gets to take advantage of this past RG3 season
UVA would get some of the early 2000's years...Texas Tech is actually a pretty close comparison, but yields to UVA.
OSU has a LOOOOONG history of a couple of winning years followed by crap (look at the ten years post Barry Sanders). Gundy looks to be pretty doggone good...but we will see what happens this year with Blackmon and QB gone. NC State going back to the earlier 2000's would have the big seasons of Philip Rivers.
WVa has been a consistent performer, but UNC does best them when looking back at 10 years plus.
Again, kudos for not looking at last year like so many, but I differ based on a longer snapshot.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [69764]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90816
Joined: 2001
|
Let's look at all-time winning percentages then
May 21, 2012, 2:23 PM
|
|
Duke (.485) - Kansas (.501)
Wake (.411) - Raylor (.500)
Virginia (.529) - Texas Tech (.561)
NC State (.507) - Oklahoma State (.504)
UNC (.560) - West Virginia (.601)
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4444]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
nice!***
May 21, 2012, 2:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6953]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 13902
Joined: 2000
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [69764]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90816
Joined: 2001
|
You'll still be able to do that....
May 21, 2012, 2:48 PM
|
|
(travel to NC and Virginia to watch .500 football), you just won't be able to see Clemson play them unless it's a rare OOC game.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Let's look at all-time winning percentages then
May 21, 2012, 4:24 PM
[ in reply to Let's look at all-time winning percentages then ] |
|
and texas at 858-333-34 ,oklahoma at 819-310-53 are more wins than 'bama and tenn,the 2 winningest programs in the sec.i kind of like going to games against teams like that,how 'bout y'all. to see that there would be big time football coming to the valley as regularly scheduled games is priceless.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6953]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 13902
Joined: 2000
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [62710]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62753
Joined: 2007
|
Re: FOR****
May 21, 2012, 1:55 PM
|
|
hb
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2128]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Match FSU's play. If we go together: For.***
May 21, 2012, 1:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Conqueror [11328]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 12633
Joined: 1999
|
Fore***
May 21, 2012, 1:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Conference [422]
TigerPulse: 63%
17
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 2:00 PM
|
|
only if FSU goes
|
|
|
|
 |
Scout Team [162]
TigerPulse: 61%
12
|
nay! SEC is better fit!***
May 21, 2012, 2:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [69764]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90816
Joined: 2001
|
You do realize the $EC is NOT an option for Clemson***
May 21, 2012, 2:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [21020]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 17414
Joined: 2008
|
Let's escape mediocrity--Warp Speed Ahead!
May 21, 2012, 2:05 PM
|
|
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6953]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 13902
Joined: 2000
|
We could do that without joining the Big 12(10). Just win.***
May 21, 2012, 2:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Titan [49905]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 30364
Joined: 1998
|
Assuming the expected, fjord.***
May 21, 2012, 2:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [667]
TigerPulse: 77%
21
|
for it if FSU and Ga Tech come with us and the $$ is right***
May 21, 2012, 2:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Connoisseur [350]
TigerPulse: 93%
16
|
For. What are we wating on?***
May 21, 2012, 2:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [679]
TigerPulse: 63%
21
|
For!!!!!!***
May 21, 2012, 2:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Amateur [34]
TigerPulse: 93%
4
|
absolutely FOR***********
May 21, 2012, 2:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-American [594]
TigerPulse: 95%
20
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 2:31 PM
|
|
For!!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [3665]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Against but better to move than be left out***
May 21, 2012, 2:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6953]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 13902
Joined: 2000
|
Against, unless more teams than just FSU bolt.***
May 21, 2012, 2:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3821]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
So far about 87% of the responses have been FOR
May 21, 2012, 2:42 PM
|
|
Interesting
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6953]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 13902
Joined: 2000
|
probably about the same percentage that are under age 25
May 21, 2012, 2:47 PM
|
|
and have no memory of college football or Clemson football pre-Bowden.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3821]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
I disagree 100%. I was at the Orange Bowl in '81 & I'm For
May 21, 2012, 2:53 PM
|
|
I think those of us that have witnessed years of ACC football know it's never going to take the next step.
When was the last time UNC, UVA, NC State, Wake, Duke, Maryland were consistently nationally relevant?
We've got to take a step up if Clemson is going to compete consistently at the top.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6953]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 13902
Joined: 2000
|
key word***
May 21, 2012, 4:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [6953]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 13902
Joined: 2000
|
key word " we've" got to step up. Meaning Clemson.
May 21, 2012, 4:09 PM
[ in reply to I disagree 100%. I was at the Orange Bowl in '81 & I'm For ] |
|
who cares what the rest of the conference did or didn't do. If Clemson were playing at the level we were playing in the 80's, nobody would be leaving the ACC out of the equation. The only reason the ACC is getting left out, is because we are all sucking at this point.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22331]
TigerPulse: 86%
53
Posts: 18677
Joined: 2007
|
For***
May 21, 2012, 2:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14374]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 14876
Joined: 2001
|
4 12***
May 21, 2012, 2:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ring of Honor [22307]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 18026
Joined: 2005
|
For***
May 21, 2012, 2:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Starter [379]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 3:48 PM
|
|
For it or the SEC for 30 years...hate this NC conference...
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Titan [48516]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 43262
Joined: 1998
|
For, and ten years from now...
May 21, 2012, 3:57 PM
|
|
We'll be praising Jesus that we did it.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7930]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 13705
Joined: 2002
|
For 100%***
May 21, 2012, 4:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3788]
TigerPulse: 99%
35
|
Why didn't you post a survey?***
May 21, 2012, 4:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Savant [460]
TigerPulse: 51%
18
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 4:06 PM
|
|
For
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1660]
TigerPulse: 98%
31
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 4:12 PM
|
|
Don't care I'm a Clemson fan, conference don't matter.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [247]
TigerPulse: 60%
13
|
Re: Let's see where you stand: For or Against going to the B12
May 21, 2012, 4:14 PM
|
|
For
|
|
|
|
Replies: 96
| visibility 2291
|
|
|