Replies: 27
| visibility 3,700
|
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43638
Joined: 12/12/12
|
TNET: The ACC issues a response to Clemson's lawsuit with the conference
1
Mar 19, 2024, 3:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20105]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16774
Joined: 11/28/00
|
Re: TNET: The ACC issues a response to Clemson's lawsuit with the conference
1
4
Mar 19, 2024, 3:39 PM
|
|
Screw them bastages!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2640]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3387
Joined: 8/1/02
|
Re: TNET: The ACC issues a response to Clemson's lawsuit with the conference
Mar 20, 2024, 7:59 AM
|
|
Farging iceholes
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12943]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6228
Joined: 1/26/16
|
this is ACC code for...
1
4
Mar 19, 2024, 3:41 PM
|
|
"we're screwed"
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4118]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4423
Joined: 10/6/03
|
Here is my official response
1
5
5
Mar 19, 2024, 3:59 PM
|
|
Eat #### Jim
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23082]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16958
Joined: 12/2/00
|
ACC would be in better shape
1
10
10
Mar 19, 2024, 4:28 PM
|
|
If they applied this energy historically to promoting the conference instead of watching it get destroyed, then suing to hold on to everybody.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1114]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1366
Joined: 9/20/04
|
Re: ACC would be in better shape
2
Mar 19, 2024, 10:11 PM
|
|
Or building a case to renegotiate with ESPN
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6866]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 6508
Joined: 10/7/07
|
Wonder how many more times they are going to have to use this canned retort lol
2
1
Mar 19, 2024, 4:30 PM
|
|
Hopefully many, and hopefully soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22886]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7318
Joined: 8/31/03
|
I think Baghdad Bob wrote it.
9
1
9
Mar 19, 2024, 4:33 PM
|
|
"We are winning. We are not worried. Everything is wonderful."
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14638]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8053
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: I think Baghdad Bob wrote it.
2
Mar 19, 2024, 6:21 PM
|
|
Bagdad Bob was my favorite spokesman. He had the hardest job ever!!!!! LMAO
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1748]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 3440
Joined: 2/7/07
|
Bagdad Bob's reality-denial job wasn't any harder than Karine Jean-Pierre's.***
2
Mar 19, 2024, 6:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16385]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12821
Joined: 11/14/09
|
I got two words for the ACC -
1
Mar 19, 2024, 4:37 PM
|
|
fraudulent inducement.
FSU's lawsuit touched on elements here with regards to Swofford and deals he was cutting that did not have the necessary transparency at the time, thus providing members with potentially compromised information from which to make the decisions they did leading to this current agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [266]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 170
Joined: 12/4/11
|
Exactly! It wasnt an option not to sign the GOR
Mar 20, 2024, 7:48 PM
|
|
If a school didn’t, they would have been booted out of the ACC. And that was back when the ACC actually mattered a little. So it was understood that to be a member, a school had to sign away its media rights. When the conference ceased its fiduciary duty to its members and drastically mismanaged its moneymaking potential, it rapidly became irrelevant. It’s time to go!
Why didn’t they fight for better media contracts as strongly as they go after their own members?! It’s unconscionable the way ACC brass is treating FSU and Clemson. Clemson tried to play nice, but was rebuffed like a jealous lover. Time to take off the gloves, throw down, and start really landing some haymakers! No holds barred now!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4436]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 3270
Joined: 11/7/22
|
lol!
1
Mar 19, 2024, 4:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40212]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9578
Joined: 6/13/19
|
Re: TNET: The ACC issues a response to Clemson's lawsuit with the conference
4
Mar 19, 2024, 5:09 PM
|
|
The ACC is going down. They have not acted in the best interest of the league members. They have shirked their fiduciary responsibilities to the league members. That's illegal.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2027]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2166
Joined: 1/11/11
|
Re: TNET: The ACC issues a response to Clemson's lawsuit with the conference
3
Mar 19, 2024, 7:38 PM
|
|
The fact that we are so far behind these other conferences, and the ACC is doing nothing about it, shows either a lack of competency, nerve or ethics. Pick one. Don't care. Swoffie, nor our current effigy, show any reason to believe anything will get better. As much as I despise the idea, it's time to go.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1760]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1677
Joined: 12/8/98
|
The ACC has always had the best "strongly worded letters"
2
Mar 19, 2024, 5:49 PM
|
|
I, for one, am going to miss them when they are gone.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [44160]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 33057
Joined: 2/22/03
|
The ACC is unfortunately correct. We signed it.
1
Mar 19, 2024, 7:01 PM
|
|
That’s on us and the other ACC schools who enthusiastically agreed to a bad deal.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2027]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2166
Joined: 1/11/11
|
Re: The ACC is unfortunately correct. We signed it.
1
Mar 19, 2024, 7:40 PM
|
|
Kinda like agreeing to BB. Sometimes you've got to swallow the poison and move on.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [42042]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7035
Joined: 12/14/20
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [710]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 404
Joined: 9/26/22
|
Re: The ACC is unfortunately correct. We signed it.
Mar 19, 2024, 8:39 PM
|
|
But Clemson had to have some reason they think it will succeed? Or did we get some USuCk coot lawyers?
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [96]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 85
Joined: 4/11/04
|
Re: The ACC is unfortunately correct. We signed it.
5
5
Mar 19, 2024, 8:45 PM
[ in reply to The ACC is unfortunately correct. We signed it. ] |
|
The suit doesn’t dispute the fact that Clemson signed and is bound by the GOR. The argument is that the conference’s interpretation of the contract is incorrect. Specifically, regarding the broadcast rights of games once an institution is no longer a member of the conference. Clemson’s position is that the GOR protects the rebroadcast rights of Clemson’s ACC games, but not future games played in a new conference because those are no longer subject to the ACC’s obligations under the ESPN Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8263]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3499
Joined: 2/14/12
|
/\ This /\
2
Mar 19, 2024, 9:48 PM
|
|
Exactly GSTiger! It's all about the broadcasting rights. It's not about what each University signed. Evidently there's some wording in the contract that's different than what's in the ESPN agreement with the ACC.
Sounds like this may be Clemson's way out!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8263]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3499
Joined: 2/14/12
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3732]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 4859
Joined: 11/4/03
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17790]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14250
Joined: 10/24/10
|
Damm men, sounds like we could be headed for Double Secret Probation***
1
Mar 19, 2024, 10:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [46861]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13802
Joined: 7/18/12
|
SEC bound soon & very soon its coming.
1
Mar 20, 2024, 12:03 AM
|
|
Within the next year it will be decided as to when we will be moving on out.
Clemson will always be a top Football destination regardless if we win it all or don’t make the playoffs!
Clemson has a rich history and it’s going to get richer!
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [416]
TigerPulse: 57%
Posts: 545
Joined: 5/5/06
|
Anywhere but the ACC Lets Go Tigers!
Mar 20, 2024, 7:50 AM
|
|
Clemson will be playing football in a new conference by 2025. The ACC teams will lose revenue if they don’t leave. Clemson and FSU football have a lot to sell. I am not so sure about some of the other teams.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 27
| visibility 3,700
|
|
|