|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1
|
110%er [7971]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1898]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Coot depth chart. Would any start for us?
Aug 29, 2016, 1:02 PM
|
|
Possibly on our scout team?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69878]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90867
Joined: 2001
|
In all fairness....
Aug 29, 2016, 1:15 PM
|
|
they have two, maybe three players who would compete for time on the two-deep. That's pretty much it though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32939]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18472
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Only one. Zach Bailey.***
Aug 29, 2016, 1:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21690]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 12525
Joined: 2002
|
Re: Only one. Zach Bailey.***
Aug 29, 2016, 2:01 PM
|
|
Agree with Ridgeland. I'd put Zach Bailey - right now - ahead of Taylor Hearn at LG...though Hearn has similar size and strength and brings the zealous mentality of a Nathan Bennett to his spot; Hearn's got some real ability and might could make it an interesting conversation. Still like Bailey a lot though.
Other than that...whoo, baby, that's a depth chart? Good God what happened to the Gamecocks' talent? I'm not sure I see a single draftable guy on that roster for the next 2-3 classes.
That's astoundingly grim. The worst part is, you can't even say it's overly young, since they're carrying so much JUCO deadwood that didn't pan out in that, uhm, "depth chart". (Sounds better than the "Palooka List", or "The 44 or So Warm Bodies We're Trotting Out This Year Wearing Gamecock Uniforms", I suppose.)
That offense will likely set new benchmarks for futility this year, and I can't see the D being that good either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69878]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90867
Joined: 2001
|
Which is one of the reasons why....
Aug 29, 2016, 3:18 PM
|
|
they are projected to finish dead last in the $EC Least and are 3.5 point underdogs to VANDERBILT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2835]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Wow. Spurrier screwed them in recruiting.
Aug 29, 2016, 1:31 PM
|
|
Really hits home when you see it spelled out like that.
I don't anyone who could do it, frankly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [968]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Wasn't #93 Urine Jones
Aug 29, 2016, 2:19 PM
|
|
the dude that talked smack?
Cottam second teamer, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3573]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Orth
Aug 29, 2016, 2:22 PM
|
|
yeah...him. 
I would bet that Bailey would have been in contention for a starting spot and MAYBE Chaz Elder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: Coot depth chart. Would any start for us?
Aug 29, 2016, 2:38 PM
|
|
Nunez not even in rotation at QB ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [43181]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43588
Joined: 1998
|
They have 3 even QBs***
Aug 29, 2016, 3:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1914]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Coot depth chart. Would any start for us?
Aug 29, 2016, 3:42 PM
|
|
They would would all be walk Ons
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6956]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 13904
Joined: 2000
|
TJ Hollowman perhaps?***
Aug 29, 2016, 4:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3981]
TigerPulse: 91%
35
|
Re: Coot depth chart. Would any start for us?
Aug 29, 2016, 4:15 PM
|
|
Didn't that guy use to write for TCI? If so how in the world could you change from covering Clemson to covering the chickens
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [86]
TigerPulse: 96%
9
|
Re: Coot depth chart. Would any start for us?
Aug 29, 2016, 10:03 PM
|
|
somehow there around 19 Rivals 4 Star recruits on this list...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
