CLEMSON LIFESTYLE

COMMENTARY: President Barker Breaks Silence


by - Correspondent -

CLEMSON -- The wall of silence surrounding Clemson University came down late Tuesday

afternoon.

Sort of.

Three days after I first broke the story of apparent internal sanctions

levied against the Clemson football program by the Compliance Services

office, President James Barker Tuesday issued an e-mail response to those that had tried to contact

him while on a university trip to Florida.

Barker's e-mail is as confusing as it is welcome.

While it served to pull Clemson's head out of the sand — temporarily, at

least — it appears to indicate that the inquiry into the Gaffney

debacle that began last year is still ongoing.

That would be contrary to reports which followed the mess leading up to

signing day in Feb., in which at least one publication said the NCAA had

investigated the recruiting of linebacker Roger McIntosh and defensive

lineman Jeff Littlejohn and found no violations.

However, Barker's e-mail states, in part, the following:

"Reports surfaced in late September concerning possible improper contacts

with high school football student-athletes in Gaffney. In keeping with

standard procedures, our compliance office began looking into these

allegations. At about the same time, officials from the NCAA began to do the

same. As has been our practice, we worked closely and cooperatively with NCAA

staff, sharing information and seeking their advice. Although the athletic

director is in charge of the athletics program and compliance, I have been

kept fully informed throughout the review. Any actions that are taken as a

result of rules violations must be approved by the athletic director and the

president. The process has not yet been completed, and that is why no

information has been released to date by the university. As has been our

practice in all compliance matters, when we have full and complete

information, we will release it externally, and we will share it internally

as well. I ask that you not rush to judgment until all the facts are known."

As I reported last week, a source close to the situation told me that

compliance already had stripped Clemson of two scholarships for next season,

and took away anywhere from 5-20 official visits, depending on which media

report you catch from day to day.

Additionally, my source told me at least two coaches and an administrative

assistant had salaries frozen, while one coach apparently has been taken off

the road. Two coaches were ordered to attend an NCAA rules clinic at their

own expense, the source said, and compliance also took away a week of

recruiting time in both the spring and winter contact periods.

The penalties apparently stem from secondary violations, and seem to be a

case of severe overreaction by Becky Bowman in the compliance office.

At least that's how it appears on the surface.

What exactly is going on inside Clemson? My source told me when my original

story hit the paper Saturday and began to making its way around the state via

the internet, the you-know-what hit the fan inside the school's athletic

department.

Who can blame them? After all, this is the last kind of information Clemson

University wants brought to the public's attention considering its sordid

past with the NCAA.

But it's precisely what Clemson fans, who give money to IPTAY by the

truckload, deserve to hear. Their dollars drive the school's athletic

program, and Clemson owes them an explanation.

So instead of enacting a code of silence, or bludgeoning us with official

rhetoric, it's time for Barker or Athletic Director Bobby Robinson to step

forward and explain, in detail, exactly what has happened or is going to

happen.

Much of the information may become available in a couple of weeks anyway,

thanks to a Freedom of Information Act request I filed with Bowman's office

last week. But the administration shouldn't make us wait that long.

If, as Barker said in his e-mail, Clemson is committed to "...maintaining

full compliance, achieve notable recognition with another national football

championship, two championships in Olympic sports and two Final Four

appearances in basketball," changes in the school's standard operating

procedure must be made.

A better balance must be struck between athletics and academics, and those

Board of Trustee members, Faculty Representatives and liasions who have been

given too much say-so over what goes on inside the athletic department must

be muzzled.

The final say-so should come from Robinson, with the approval of Barker.

As it stands now, Robinson appears to be merely a puppet with too many hands

in his back.


FULL BARKER EMAIL:

Dear Clemson:

We recently adopted a set of strategic goals, and one of those goals reads as follows: "While maintaining full compliance, achieve notable recognition with another national football championship, two championships in Olympic sports and two Final Four appearances in basketball." That goal contains two equal and tandem objectives -- full compliance and national championships. I am confident that we can achieve both. We have made a commitment to invest energy and resources into athletics facilities and staff, and we have made an equal commitment to compliance in order to achieve our goals.

You may have read recent news articles about possible NCAA rules violations in our athletics program, and you may have wondered why the university has not commented. In the spirit of open communication, I would like to share information about our athletics compliance process.

Reports surfaced in late September concerning possible improper contacts with high school football student-athletes in Gaffney. In keeping with standard procedures, our compliance office began looking into these allegations. At about the same time, officials from the NCAA began to do the same. As has been our practice, we worked closely and cooperatively with NCAA staff, sharing information and seeking their advice. Although the athletic director is in charge of the athletics program and compliance, I have been kept fully informed throughout the review. Any actions that are taken as a result of rules violations must be approved by the athletic director and the president. The process has not yet been completed, and that is why no information has been released to date by the university. As has been our practice in all compliance matters, when we have full and complete information, we will release it externally, and we will share it internally as well. I ask that you not rush to judgment until all the facts are known.

I have full confidence in our athletic department staff and coaches. They demand a high standard of behavior from everyone associated with our program, on and off the field. We are all committed to maintaining the integrity of the institution. Any decisions regarding sanctions or corrective measures will reflect that commitment.

Sincerely,

Jim Barker , FAIA

President

Related Articles

Dan Scott is the host of SportsTalk (10AM-Noon) on 104.9 FM in Upstate SC and

Managing Editor of Seneca Daily Journal/Clemson Daily Messenger

Ultimate Level LogoUpgrade Your Account

Unlock premium boards and exclusive features (e.g. ad-free) by upgrading your account today.

Upgrade Now
Print   
Send Feedback to Dan Scott: Email | Comment
Clemson’s Nate Wiggins picked in NFL draft first round
Clemson’s Nate Wiggins picked in NFL draft first round
Clemson guard enters transfer portal
Clemson guard enters transfer portal
No. 4 Tigers head to Louisville
No. 4 Tigers head to Louisville
Clemson defender ranked in Top 25 prospects if every player was NFL draft-eligible
Clemson defender ranked in Top 25 prospects if every player was NFL draft-eligible