»
Topic: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric
Replies: 24   Last Post: Feb 10, 2020, 8:22 AM by: jgtiger
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 24  

TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric

[3]
Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 2:01 PM
 

 
Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric

Clemson is likely your preseason No. 1 team for the 2020 season, but that doesn’t mean it won’t be relying on some fresh faces to accomplish that same final ran Read Update »



Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric

[2]
Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 2:30 PM
 

R E L O A D

2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

DB23


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric


Posted: Feb 8, 2020, 3:23 PM
 

Yep, looking at how schools rank it seems to be a bad thing to be ranked high. Nobody wants your players. Reloading is our specialty!


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric

[1]
Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 2:33 PM
 

Not sure I agree with this breakdown:

• Percentage of last season's QB passing yards returning: 32% of offensive returning production formula
• Percentage of last season's WR/TE receiving yards returning: 32%
• Percentage of career starts returning on the offensive line: 17.5%
• Percentage of last season's offensive line snaps returning: 12%
• Percentage of last season's RB rushing yards returning: 6.5%

null


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric


Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 3:03 PM
 

So 30% comes from the O-line, where we lost 4 starters.

Imagine if we had to replace our QB and #1 RB, like we will next year.


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric


Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 3:21 PM
 

Difference between this year and next will be an experienced and capable back up stepping in.


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric

[1]
Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 3:04 PM
 

Uh...maybe they didnt realize Travis was returning? Amount of sleep lost on this pile of analytics = number of losses in 2020 season. (Zero)


As far as GT and SC goes, I’ll quote Frank

emoji_events [6]
Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 4:10 PM
 

Howard. Yeah they got a lot of experience back but it’s all bad.


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric

[1]
Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 3:20 PM
 

Clemson returns their leading passer and leading rusher as well as 2nd 3rd 4th etc, our 2nd most receiving yards as well as 3rd too..... Really only lose some on the OL here and Tee. Tough to imagine that's 40% comparatively to TL and ETN.


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric

[1]
Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 3:23 PM
 

Yaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnn.


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric


Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 6:28 PM
 

Yes. What he said??.


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric


Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 4:15 PM
 

Holy Moley... What a useless stat... This would be useful in the NFL...

2020 white level member

Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric


Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 4:17 PM
 

Totally meaningless. Probably done by a bunch of snot noses with little knowledge of the sport or team. Any consideration to the quality of the back ups ? Not. A waste of time by espn. And I agree the offense info has to be a joke.


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric

[1]
Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 5:11 PM
 

Call it retool or rebuild, there is work to be done this off season.


I think Dabo summed it up when he said, "There is nothing


Posted: Feb 7, 2020, 7:52 PM
 

less important than the score at half time".


Dabo Lied To Us

[2]
Posted: Feb 8, 2020, 1:12 AM
 

He said next year’s team would be better.


Percentage of last season's RB rushing yards returning: 6.5%

[1]
Posted: Feb 8, 2020, 9:35 AM
 

???????????????????????????????????????
Lyn-J and ETN both coming back but we lose 93.5% of RB production. I CALL BBS

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

A coot will usually blink when hit in the head with a ball-peen hammer


Re: Percentage of last season's RB rushing yards returning: 6.5%


Posted: Feb 8, 2020, 12:26 PM
 

2k® said:

???????????????????????????????????????
Lyn-J and ETN both coming back but we lose 93.5% of RB production. I CALL BBS



That’s just the percentage that returning RB production weighs in the formula overall. The formula weighs returning WR/TE tied for the most (with QB) so losing a leading receiver in Tee Higgins plus four starters on the OL has Clemson lower on the list.


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric


Posted: Feb 8, 2020, 9:38 AM
 

"We're DOOOOOOMED!"
-Eeyore.

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Yeah........


Posted: Feb 8, 2020, 9:46 AM
 

I’m gonna lose a lot of sleep over this load of bull chit........4 sure.......????????


Re: TNET: Clemson ranks low in ESPN returning production metric


Posted: Feb 8, 2020, 11:10 AM
 

Here’s what we rank high in: a football building full of bad a**#s that have either played a few games or none at all yet.


huh? Our starting QB and RB are returning


Posted: Feb 8, 2020, 12:22 PM
 

between them, they were most of our offense

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg


I have a hard time....


Posted: Feb 8, 2020, 2:29 PM
 

......with any ranking which shows Ga Tech at #2, Clemson at #95, and Alabama at #127.

What is the point and how are the rankings developed?

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

ESPN sure knows how to make meaningless stats.***


Posted: Feb 8, 2020, 3:16 PM
 



null


I wouldnt call what Uof6C has coming back "production"


Posted: Feb 10, 2020, 8:22 AM
 

They may be returning players but to call it returning production is a bit misleading. I know its relative to each team but when compared to other teams if you return a team full of players who had a lack of production then what do you really have, lol.


Replies: 24  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: SEASON TICKETS FOR 2021 Lower Deck Section T, row 18, seats 5 & 7, plus a parking pass. $1900

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
3029 people have read this post