»
Topic: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.
Replies: 31   Last Post: Dec 6, 2013 3:26 PM by: Rogue Cock
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 31  

Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

[2]
Posted: Dec 5, 2013 12:32 PM
 

W-L against the SEC

Vandy 18-4
Mizzou 1-2
Kentucky 16-7
UGA 17-46
LSU 2-17
Florida 6-24
Tenn 7-22
Arky 8-13
Auburn 1-9
Miss St 8-6
Bama 3-12
Ole Miss 7-8

This is why their own league considers then new money impostors. How can you hoist an SEC flag so high when you've contributed nothing to support it other than W's for other teams?

yeah, I know, stive for five...coots won the battle but we are WAY ahead on the war....lol

GO TIGERS


To Coots, recorded history didn't begin until 2009***

[3]
Posted: Dec 5, 2013 12:36 PM
 



2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: ....and France and Spain are historically world powers.

[1]
Posted: Dec 6, 2013 2:11 PM
 

Guess by yall's definition they still are.

Your Character is what you do when no one is watching.


LOL what?***


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 2:49 PM
 




Never talk history with a coot


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 2:50 PM
 

You will get dumber.


Re: LOL what?***


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 2:53 PM
 

You don't think France or Spain were once world powers? History didn't start in the 20th century.

Your Character is what you do when no one is watching.


YOU'RE telling ME that??


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 3:24 PM
 

Bwahahahahhahaha


Re: To Coots, recorded history didn't begin until 2009***


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 2:59 PM
 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/05/west-virginia-beats-clemson-orange-bowl-2012_n_1185285.html


Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 12:46 PM
 

> yeah, I know, stive for five...coots won the battle
> but we are WAY ahead on the war....lol
>
> GO TIGERS

Good point! Wars are all based on what you did in the past, not what territory you hold now, right?


Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 12:47 PM
 

I would have to reteach you Geography and US History for you to understand his reference. I don't have that kind of time.


Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 1:57 PM
 

So the US still belongs to England?


Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 3:12 PM
 

England didn't give us the country because we won a handful of battles. We had to win numerous battles and chip away at what we controlled over time and finally they had no choice but to give up control.

I don't remember it as we won a handful of battles and England said, "Well you guys own us now, we will just give in".


Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 12:52 PM
 

0-21 that's some history right there .

Coots are one chest pain away from new history

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

[1]
Posted: Dec 5, 2013 12:54 PM
 

I don't know about the rest of your stats, but SCAR has beat Missouri both times.


Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 1:57 PM
 

we've lost to them twice in bowl games, the stats he's using are outdated. Should be 2-2.


Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

[1]
Posted: Dec 5, 2013 12:57 PM
 

Mizzou stat isn't correct. They have beaten Mizzou 2 years in a row...how is their record only 1-2?


Two questions:


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 1:50 PM
 

1) CU's record vs SEC teams? (I know you DOMINATE the series vs coots)

2) What exactly has CU accomplished in the ACC since FSU joined?


Re: Two questions:


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 1:51 PM
 

We won an ACC championship


Re: Two questions:


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 1:58 PM
 

another door stop to rub before games.


Re: Two questions:


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 3:09 PM
 

What is that supposed to mean...get a logical argument or get out coot


Re: Two questions:

[1]
Posted: Dec 5, 2013 3:15 PM
 

Your team's fans cheer for a crossdressing chicken behind a shower curtain and you want to make fun of our rock?


That is correct ... we have so many conference


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 3:30 PM
 

championship trophies in football that we can spare an extra to use as a doorstop.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


And, been in the ACCCG twice.***


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 3:14 PM
 



2020 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton


Clemson's record versus the SEC


Posted: Dec 5, 2013 3:25 PM
 

All time Clemson is 44-95-5 against the SEC.

Since 1980, Clemson is 25-27-1 against the SEC.

In the last 15 years, Clemson has lost more games than it has won against the SEC only 3 times (2001, 2006, 2010). This is not many games per season but I thought it was an interesting stat. During this time Clemson is 14-14 versus the SEC.


Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 2:31 PM
 

Hasn't SC beaten Mizzou the past two years? How can their record be 1-2 if so?


At least we have a winning record against Vandy and KY

[1]
Posted: Dec 6, 2013 2:41 PM
 

Clemson even has a losing record against them


You have a losing record against Duke


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 2:48 PM
 

Next subject....


Their ACC record wasn't much better!***


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 2:47 PM
 



military_donation.jpg

Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***

[1]
Posted: Dec 6, 2013 3:17 PM
 

I don't think their history bothers them. I think Clemson fans think it does but they know their history and it is what it is called,history.

military_donation.jpg

Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 3:23 PM
 

Thank You. Historically, we're terrible...only a fool would argue otherwise. We simply acknowledge it, hopefully learn from it, and move on.

Your Character is what you do when no one is watching.


Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 3:23 PM
 

I went to PC but I pull for South Carolina. Their history does not bother me. I was not alive for most of it. I don't take the insults thrown at South Carolina personally because I don't consider myself a real Carolina fan because I also pull for Clemson. I am more about what makes our State look more competitive to the people from other States and so far in the last several years this State has been represented well by both schools.

military_donation.jpg

Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***


Posted: Dec 6, 2013 3:26 PM
 

"...in the last several years this State has been represented well by both schools."

Agreed.

Your Character is what you do when no one is watching.


Replies: 31  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: I pay 3600 a year Pay half and can buy 4 tickets lower deck on about 30 yd line at the cost of seas...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
1577 people have read this post