|
Replies: 31
| visibility 400
|
All-TigerNet [11161]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 10900
Joined: 2007
|
Coots have a much bigger problem with history.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:32 PM
|
|
W-L against the SEC
Vandy 18-4
Mizzou 1-2
Kentucky 16-7
UGA 17-46
LSU 2-17
Florida 6-24
Tenn 7-22
Arky 8-13
Auburn 1-9
Miss St 8-6
Bama 3-12
Ole Miss 7-8
This is why their own league considers then new money impostors. How can you hoist an SEC flag so high when you've contributed nothing to support it other than W's for other teams?
yeah, I know, stive for five...coots won the battle but we are WAY ahead on the war....lol
GO TIGERS
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [69781]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90820
Joined: 2001
|
To Coots, recorded history didn't begin until 2009***
Dec 5, 2013, 12:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6589]
TigerPulse: 46%
40
|
Re: ....and France and Spain are historically world powers.
Dec 6, 2013, 2:11 PM
|
|
Guess by yall's definition they still are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
LOL what?***
Dec 6, 2013, 2:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11484]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Never talk history with a coot
Dec 6, 2013, 2:50 PM
|
|
You will get dumber.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6589]
TigerPulse: 46%
40
|
Re: LOL what?***
Dec 6, 2013, 2:53 PM
[ in reply to LOL what?*** ] |
|
You don't think France or Spain were once world powers? History didn't start in the 20th century.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
YOU'RE telling ME that??
Dec 6, 2013, 3:24 PM
|
|
Bwahahahahhahaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [20]
TigerPulse: 26%
3
|
Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:46 PM
|
|
> yeah, I know, stive for five...coots won the battle
> but we are WAY ahead on the war....lol
>
> GO TIGERS
Good point! Wars are all based on what you did in the past, not what territory you hold now, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11484]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:47 PM
|
|
I would have to reteach you Geography and US History for you to understand his reference. I don't have that kind of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.
Dec 5, 2013, 1:57 PM
|
|
So the US still belongs to England?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11484]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.
Dec 5, 2013, 3:12 PM
|
|
England didn't give us the country because we won a handful of battles. We had to win numerous battles and chip away at what we controlled over time and finally they had no choice but to give up control.
I don't remember it as we won a handful of battles and England said, "Well you guys own us now, we will just give in".
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1335]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [4]
TigerPulse: 33%
1
|
Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:54 PM
|
|
I don't know about the rest of your stats, but SCAR has beat Missouri both times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.
Dec 5, 2013, 1:57 PM
|
|
we've lost to them twice in bowl games, the stats he's using are outdated. Should be 2-2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [328]
TigerPulse: 53%
15
|
Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:57 PM
|
|
Mizzou stat isn't correct. They have beaten Mizzou 2 years in a row...how is their record only 1-2?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1081]
TigerPulse: 47%
25
|
Two questions:
Dec 5, 2013, 1:50 PM
|
|
1) CU's record vs SEC teams? (I know you DOMINATE the series vs coots)
2) What exactly has CU accomplished in the ACC since FSU joined?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [328]
TigerPulse: 53%
15
|
Re: Two questions:
Dec 5, 2013, 1:51 PM
|
|
We won an ACC championship
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: Two questions:
Dec 5, 2013, 1:58 PM
|
|
another door stop to rub before games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [328]
TigerPulse: 53%
15
|
Re: Two questions:
Dec 5, 2013, 3:09 PM
|
|
What is that supposed to mean...get a logical argument or get out coot
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11484]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Two questions:
Dec 5, 2013, 3:15 PM
[ in reply to Re: Two questions: ] |
|
Your team's fans cheer for a crossdressing chicken behind a shower curtain and you want to make fun of our rock?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69822]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 41621
Joined: 2001
|
That is correct ... we have so many conference
Dec 5, 2013, 3:30 PM
[ in reply to Re: Two questions: ] |
|
championship trophies in football that we can spare an extra to use as a doorstop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69822]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 41621
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11484]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Clemson's record versus the SEC
Dec 5, 2013, 3:25 PM
[ in reply to Two questions: ] |
|
All time Clemson is 44-95-5 against the SEC.
Since 1980, Clemson is 25-27-1 against the SEC.
In the last 15 years, Clemson has lost more games than it has won against the SEC only 3 times (2001, 2006, 2010). This is not many games per season but I thought it was an interesting stat. During this time Clemson is 14-14 versus the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [43]
TigerPulse: 74%
5
|
Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.
Dec 6, 2013, 2:31 PM
|
|
Hasn't SC beaten Mizzou the past two years? How can their record be 1-2 if so?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [400]
TigerPulse: 24%
17
|
At least we have a winning record against Vandy and KY
Dec 6, 2013, 2:41 PM
|
|
Clemson even has a losing record against them
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11484]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
You have a losing record against Duke
Dec 6, 2013, 2:48 PM
|
|
Next subject....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9855]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 11146
Joined: 2003
|
Their ACC record wasn't much better!***
Dec 6, 2013, 2:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***
Dec 6, 2013, 3:17 PM
|
|
I don't think their history bothers them. I think Clemson fans think it does but they know their history and it is what it is called,history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6589]
TigerPulse: 46%
40
|
Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***
Dec 6, 2013, 3:23 PM
|
|
Thank You. Historically, we're terrible...only a fool would argue otherwise. We simply acknowledge it, hopefully learn from it, and move on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***
Dec 6, 2013, 3:23 PM
[ in reply to Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!*** ] |
|
I went to PC but I pull for South Carolina. Their history does not bother me. I was not alive for most of it. I don't take the insults thrown at South Carolina personally because I don't consider myself a real Carolina fan because I also pull for Clemson. I am more about what makes our State look more competitive to the people from other States and so far in the last several years this State has been represented well by both schools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6589]
TigerPulse: 46%
40
|
Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***
Dec 6, 2013, 3:26 PM
|
|
"...in the last several years this State has been represented well by both schools."
Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 31
| visibility 400
|
|
|
50
