Topic: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

Replies: 31 Last Post: Dec 6, 2013, 3:26 PM by: Rogue Cock

This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.

Welcome, Guest
faceLog-In to personalize
assignment_indRegister help_centerHelp

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]

Start New Topic

Replies: 31

cutigersJD

All-TigerNet [11161]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 10900

Joined: 9/17/07

Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

[2]
Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 12:32 PM

W-L against the SEC

Vandy 18-4
Mizzou 1-2
Kentucky 16-7
UGA 17-46
LSU 2-17
Florida 6-24
Tenn 7-22
Arky 8-13
Auburn 1-9
Miss St 8-6
Bama 3-12
Ole Miss 7-8

This is why their own league considers then new money impostors. How can you hoist an SEC flag so high when you've contributed nothing to support it other than W's for other teams?

yeah, I know, stive for five...coots won the battle but we are WAY ahead on the war....lol

GO TIGERS

BigCUFan®

All-In [48222]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 80230

Joined: 3/28/01

To Coots, recorded history didn't begin until 2009***

[3]
Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 12:36 PM

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.

Rogue Cock

Ambassador [6577]

TigerPulse: 45%

Posts: 9805

Joined: 1/28/03

Re: ....and France and Spain are historically world powers.

[1]
Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 2:11 PM

Guess by yall's definition they still are.

Your Character is what you do when no one is watching.

TigerGrad11

Orange Blooded [4773]

TigerPulse: 92%

Posts: 7611

Joined: 12/18/11

LOL what?***

Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 2:49 PM

TigersO

110%er [8659]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 7831

Joined: 10/3/12

Never talk history with a coot

Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 2:50 PM

You will get dumber.

Rogue Cock

Ambassador [6577]

TigerPulse: 45%

Posts: 9805

Joined: 1/28/03

Re: LOL what?***

Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 2:53 PM

You don't think France or Spain were once world powers? History didn't start in the 20th century.

Your Character is what you do when no one is watching.

TigerGrad11

Orange Blooded [4773]

TigerPulse: 92%

Posts: 7611

Joined: 12/18/11

YOU'RE telling ME that??

Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 3:24 PM

Bwahahahahhahaha

deleted

All-Conference [408]

TigerPulse: 92%

Posts: 35

Joined: 12/1/98

Re: To Coots, recorded history didn't begin until 2009***

Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 2:59 PM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/05/west-virginia-beats-clemson-orange-bowl-2012_n_1185285.html

thecoug

Member [20]

TigerPulse: 26%

Posts: 51

Joined: 6/1/11

Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 12:46 PM

> yeah, I know, stive for five...coots won the battle
> but we are WAY ahead on the war....lol
>
> GO TIGERS

Good point! Wars are all based on what you did in the past, not what territory you hold now, right?

TigersO

110%er [8659]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 7831

Joined: 10/3/12

Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 12:47 PM

I would have to reteach you Geography and US History for you to understand his reference. I don't have that kind of time.

STRAIGHTUPCOOT

Fan [83]

TigerPulse: 29%

Posts: 221

Joined: 10/27/13

Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 1:57 PM

So the US still belongs to England?

TigersO

110%er [8659]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 7831

Joined: 10/3/12

Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 3:12 PM

England didn't give us the country because we won a handful of battles. We had to win numerous battles and chip away at what we controlled over time and finally they had no choice but to give up control.

I don't remember it as we won a handful of battles and England said, "Well you guys own us now, we will just give in".

WhoaNellyKJ®

CU Guru [1334]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 1586

Joined: 10/13/11

Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 12:52 PM

0-21 that's some history right there .

Coots are one chest pain away from new history

bd76

Freshman [4]

TigerPulse: 33%

Posts: 16

Joined: 8/31/08

Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

[1]
Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 12:54 PM

I don't know about the rest of your stats, but SCAR has beat Missouri both times.

STRAIGHTUPCOOT

Fan [83]

TigerPulse: 29%

Posts: 221

Joined: 10/27/13

Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 1:57 PM

we've lost to them twice in bowl games, the stats he's using are outdated. Should be 2-2.

Mortimer

Devotee [322]

TigerPulse: 52%

Posts: 826

Joined: 9/17/10

Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

[1]
Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 12:57 PM

Mizzou stat isn't correct. They have beaten Mizzou 2 years in a row...how is their record only 1-2?

ReallyJoelShaw

CU Guru [1081]

TigerPulse: 47%

Posts: 2072

Joined: 1/30/11

Two questions:

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 1:50 PM

1) CU's record vs SEC teams? (I know you DOMINATE the series vs coots)

2) What exactly has CU accomplished in the ACC since FSU joined?

Mortimer

Devotee [322]

TigerPulse: 52%

Posts: 826

Joined: 9/17/10

Re: Two questions:

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 1:51 PM

We won an ACC championship

STRAIGHTUPCOOT

Fan [83]

TigerPulse: 29%

Posts: 221

Joined: 10/27/13

Re: Two questions:

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 1:58 PM

another door stop to rub before games.

Mortimer

Devotee [322]

TigerPulse: 52%

Posts: 826

Joined: 9/17/10

Re: Two questions:

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 3:09 PM

What is that supposed to mean...get a logical argument or get out coot

TigersO

110%er [8659]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 7831

Joined: 10/3/12

Re: Two questions:

[1]
Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 3:15 PM

Your team's fans cheer for a crossdressing chicken behind a shower curtain and you want to make fun of our rock?

CUTiger1989®

All-In [33432]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 32028

Joined: 12/17/01

That is correct ... we have so many conference

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 3:30 PM

championship trophies in football that we can spare an extra to use as a doorstop.

"When I was young, I was sure of many things; now there are only two things of which I am sure: one is, that I am a miserable sinner; and the other, that Christ is an all-sufficient Saviour. He is well-taught who learns these two lessons." -John Newton

CUTiger1989®

All-In [33432]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 32028

Joined: 12/17/01

And, been in the ACCCG twice.***

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 3:14 PM

TigersO

110%er [8659]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 7831

Joined: 10/3/12

Clemson's record versus the SEC

Posted: Dec 5, 2013, 3:25 PM

All time Clemson is 44-95-5 against the SEC.

Since 1980, Clemson is 25-27-1 against the SEC.

In the last 15 years, Clemson has lost more games than it has won against the SEC only 3 times (2001, 2006, 2010). This is not many games per season but I thought it was an interesting stat. During this time Clemson is 14-14 versus the SEC.

WP85

Amateur [43]

TigerPulse: 74%

Posts: 261

Joined: 12/3/13

Re: Coots have a much bigger problem with history.

Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 2:31 PM

Hasn't SC beaten Mizzou the past two years? How can their record be 1-2 if so?

Bookmaker03

Addict [400]

TigerPulse: 24%

Posts: 1255

Joined: 11/4/06

At least we have a winning record against Vandy and KY

[1]
Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 2:41 PM

Clemson even has a losing record against them

TigersO

110%er [8659]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 7831

Joined: 10/3/12

You have a losing record against Duke

Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 2:48 PM

Next subject....

kbtiger®

Orange Blooded [2238]

TigerPulse: 88%

Posts: 5079

Joined: 7/11/03

Their ACC record wasn't much better!***

Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 2:47 PM

tigerstripe777®

Junkie [590]

TigerPulse: 34%

Posts: 1615

Joined: 10/4/09

Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***

[1]
Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 3:17 PM

I don't think their history bothers them. I think Clemson fans think it does but they know their history and it is what it is called,history.

Rogue Cock

Ambassador [6577]

TigerPulse: 45%

Posts: 9805

Joined: 1/28/03

Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***

Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 3:23 PM

Thank You. Historically, we're terrible...only a fool would argue otherwise. We simply acknowledge it, hopefully learn from it, and move on.

Your Character is what you do when no one is watching.

tigerstripe777®

Junkie [590]

TigerPulse: 34%

Posts: 1615

Joined: 10/4/09

Re: Their ACC record wasn't much better!***

Posted: Dec 6, 2013, 3:23 PM

I went to PC but I pull for South Carolina. Their history does not bother me. I was not alive for most of it. I don't take the insults thrown at South Carolina personally because I don't consider myself a real Carolina fan because I also pull for Clemson. I am more about what makes our State look more competitive to the people from other States and so far in the last several years this State has been represented well by both schools.