»
Topic: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..
Replies: 69   Last Post: Jan 15, 2017 11:27 AM by: Tall_Tiger_Two
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 69  

2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[9]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 6:58 PM
 

QB-Zerrick Cooper, Kelly Bryant/Johnson
RB-Feaster, Fuller, Choice
WR-Deon Cain, Overton/Higgins
WR-Ray Ray/Cornell Powell, Amari Rodgers
WR-Hunter Renfrow, TrevionThompson/Chase
TE-Milan Richard, Garret Williams
RT-Sean Pollard, Anchrum
RG-Tyrone Crowder,Maverick Morris
C-Falcinelli, Cervenka
LG-Hearn, Simpson
LT-Hyatt, Anchrum

DE-Ferrell, Xavier Kelly
DT-Dex, Huggins
DT- Wilkins, Pagano
DE- Bryant, Yeargin
WLB-Shaq Smith/Jalen Williams
MLB-Kendall Joseph, Tre Lamar
SLB-O'Daniel, Williams/Davis
CB-Trayvon Mullen, Ryan Carter
SS-Van Smith, Korrin Wiggins/Wallace
FS-Tanner Muse/Isaiah Simmons
CB-Mark Fields, Edmonds/Baker
Nickel-Ryan Carter, K'Von Wallace.

K-Huegel
P-Spiers
PR-Ray Ray/Powell/Feaster/Higgins
KR-Same as above but with Fuller

2017 commits who could be in line for early and often playing time:
Higgins, Rodgers, Johnson, Terrell, Brockhurst, Rudolph

I could see this team winning anywhere from 10 to 12 games. Only ones I think are in doubt, and I use that term lightly, are Auburn since it's so early in the season and FSU cause they are returning a lot on D and they have a proven QB. Talent wise they are the only team close to us in the ACC and on our schedule in general.

Thoughts?


Seems to be close... +1.***

[1]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:07 PM
 



2020 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: Seems to be close... +1.***

[1]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:24 PM
 

FSU is my main worry.......as usual

2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg

A coot will usually blink when hit in the head with a ball-peen hammer


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:10 PM
 

Louisville has some pretty nice talent, their D will be pretty tough next year.

I agree with you though.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:13 PM
 

Pretty sure that Louisville loses pretty much all of their defense. They also lost their Defensive Coordinator.


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:14 PM
 

Still not easy on the road against a QB who put up over 400 yards on us.


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:16 PM
 

Understood but as crazy as this sounds I believe our defense will be better and more athletic next year...which results in having a better chance of slowing him down. He may have put up over 400 but if I remember correctly most were in 2nd half and on the ground


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:24 PM
 

I do think the D could be better. We contained him good in the first half correct but he is a great player.


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:24 PM
 

He is a great athlete with elite speed and a strong inaccurate arm. Sort of like JT Barret but faster


And he had extra 5 possessions by our


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 9:29 AM
 

turnovers

military_donation.jpg

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 11:27 AM
 

But how many 4-5 star rejects and jucos are they taking? This IS UL after all...


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:14 PM
 

Yeah they do return I think 5-6 on D. But to hurt Jacksons' accuracy even more he is losing top 2 receivers, best TE and his RB.


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:13 PM
 

Fuller will start IMO everything else seems on point. Will be interesting to see how WLB turns out.


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:14 PM
 

I think Feaster will start cause on the extra gear and dynamic ability.


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:17 PM
 

He will have to improve tremendously all around. Fuller knows the plays and blocking. He also ran very well this year. It will be a 1 2 punch either way as both will get reps. Even Choice should see a lot of PT he is a fine back and will have another yea removed from injury.


Tra Lamar


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 11:18 AM
 

Yea, I have been asking for a couple weeks what people's thoughts were at WILL.
Wondering does Lamar move from Mike to WILL, or does Smith start.


At RB..
may not happen right away. But Feaster will take over #1, IMO

#21


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:14 PM
 

We have a solid lineup, lots of depth. I feel Auburn is a win, but FSU and at Loserville will be a problem.


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 10:49 PM
 

I'm willing to bet Clemson will be favored in every game,including Louisville and Florida state.


At Va tech too.***


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 11:19 AM
 




Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:28 PM
 

Not to get too far ahead but depending on QB play and the ability to score points, we should legitimately be strong playoff contenders again. It will take two RB's to replace the complete player (blocking & running) that Gallman was but I think we have that in Fuller & Feaster. Ray Ray for Tay will be nearly even swap if RR can hold onto the ball.


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:29 PM
 

By Tay are you meaning Artavis Scott? Cause he declared for the draft


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:34 PM
 

Yep, I meant Tay. Ray Ray should slide into his starting spot.


I'd be shocked if Carter isn't starting at CB


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:31 PM
 

Seeing as he started this year. Fuller starts at RB. Watch Chad Smith at Will.

Going to be fun to watch the competitions at QB, RB, C, Will, CB and S this spring.


Re: I'd be shocked if Carter isn't starting at CB

[1]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:37 PM
 

Only reason I didn't put Carter as starter at CB is because Mullen is going to develop quickly. Dude is a beast. Carter is great but Mullen is a legit CB. Cater is flexible hints the Nickel spot


Carter is not...


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 11:20 AM
 

the answer, was burnt constantly.


IMO, our Corners were the weak link from 2016.

#21


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:36 PM
 

Where is nyles Pinckney, is he not working out?


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:38 PM
 

He is just not as talented as the ones I listed IMO


He's a senior, he starts. if he's good enough


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:49 PM
 

to start over them on a Championship team, he'll start next year. He brings a toughness our other CB's don't


Re: He's a senior, he starts. if he's good enough


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 7:54 PM
 

Our opinions are different. No matter the class, best player, plays.


Only other senior starter is O'Daniel


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:09 PM
 

and he comes out for Nickel. They have confidence in Carter. You're breaking in one new CB, Carter knows what he's doing, Knows the system. Fields busts all the time and Mullen hardly saw the field. Game 1 is likely to be Carter and Edmund.


Re: Only other senior starter is O'Daniel


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:18 PM
 

Lol Carter is probably one of my favorite players on the team. But you aren't understanding that Mullen was a 5 star outta high school and looked unreal when he played. Also O'Daniel doesn't "come in" as the Nickel he starts at OLB. Not gonna argue with some old guy behind a keyboard about what could happen 8 months from now less than a week off of a championship.


You need to read it again

[2]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:35 PM
 

Says O'Daniel comes out for Nickel. Mullen hardly played, if he looked great it was garbage time. Tre Lamar is a five star, but he's not starting over three star Kendall Joseph.

If Shaq Smith doesn't get his sssignments down he won't start at Will.

Smith and Johnson were not as talented at safety this year as Green and Kearse were last year, but they were better. They didn't bust near as much. Knowing assignments and having good technique means something. Our coaches learned that when it basically cost us a championship last year.


Re: You need to read it again


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:40 PM
 

Haha you obviously can't take it when someone has a different opinion than you. I know who was higher rated. I pay attention to recruiting closer than you honestly. But whatever I'm sure you will disagree with that also hahaha have a good night ######


Well at least you're a humble little expert***

[1]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:43 PM
 




Re: Well at least you're a humble little expert***


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:44 PM
 

No not an expert I just have an opinion that is different than yours and you are so immature that you can't accept that.


So you post what for the most part is probably

[2]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:48 PM
 

pretty close but now resort to insults when someone disagrees with you? I thought we were debating, I didn't mean to send you into a hissy


Re: So you post what for the most part is probably


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:52 PM
 

Once again not in a hissy. I'm trying to figure out why you can grasp the fact the people have different opinions than you. I'm thoroughly enjoying you accusing me off being in a "hissy" though since you know me and all hahahha


Re: You need to read it again

[2]
Posted: Jan 14, 2017 12:30 AM
 

Reading all of your comments makes it appear that you are the one who can't handle people having different opinions from yours. Also, you just joined TigerNet in 2016. What makes you such an instant expert?

2020 white level member

Re: You need to read it again

[1]
Posted: Jan 14, 2017 10:51 PM
 

Hahahahhaha wow that's cute. So in order for anyone to be an "expert" the qualifications are that you have to be a TigerNet memeber for a certain number of years? I apologize. I didn't realize that in order to be an expert or even a fan of Clemson you had to be a member of this site for years on end. I thought me going to Clemson games since I was 3 and now being 22 showed I am a Clemson fan and a die hard one at that. By the way, never claimed to be an expert but I did have different opinions than the other person to whom couldn't accept my differing opinions. But apparently the "loyalties" on TigerNet are officially based on who has been a member the longest. Been reading these boards for 5-6 years just never thought about joining til this past year.


You need to learn the difference between "not accepting"

[1]
Posted: Jan 14, 2017 11:31 PM
 

and disagreeing and debating. You post an opinion on a message board, people are going to disagree. Stop taking it so personal


Re: You need to learn the difference between "not accepting"


Posted: Jan 14, 2017 11:51 PM
 

Right back at ya.


Let's see now


Posted: Jan 14, 2017 11:55 PM
 

I never once called you immature. Never said you could not take someone disagreeing with you. Just stated my opinion.

I didn't have to say you were immature, you've revealed that on your own


Re: Let's see now


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 12:20 AM
 

I'm not immature. I posted my opinion on depth chart. You stated your opinion I then stated it was your opinion and I disagreed and you kept on and on trying to convince me that your opinions were factual. Your opinions are just that, they are your opinions. No matter what you say about certain players it won't change how I feel about them haha. But in all seriousness it is what it is I guess no matter what team you are a fan of whether the same or not, you are gonna butt heads with other people. So with that being said I consider this "hissy" over with, have yourself a good night.


Yes, you are immature.

[1]
Posted: Jan 15, 2017 2:00 AM
 

It's painfully obvious.

2020 white level member

Brad Brownell: all-time winningest coach in Clemson men's basketball history, and only coach to beat North Carolina in Chapel Hill.


Re: Yes, you are immature.


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 7:49 AM
 

Whatever you say pal, I'm not the one jumping into a conversation 2 days after the thread was posted, just to have my voice heard.


You do understand that debate is attempting to convince someone

[1]
Posted: Jan 15, 2017 7:59 AM
 

of your opinion don't you? Do you also realize a sign of immaturity is not realizing you are immature, and deflecting your behavior on to others?


Re: You do understand that debate is attempting to convince someone


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 8:09 AM
 

Still not immature, I do know what debating is. I've been reading these boards for years and honestly I think it is bull$h!t how all the people who have been "members" the longest think they run this site. They think they are the only ones who are right. And by god if someone disagrees with those people they are either accused of being a coot or ganged up on because the loyalties lie with who has been on this site for the longest. And once again I attempted to bring this convo to a stop and no shocker that you had a smart a$$ remark to make.


Has nothing to do with tenure on here***


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 8:15 AM
 




Re: Yes, you are immature.

[1]
Posted: Jan 15, 2017 8:01 AM
 

You told striper good night and then responded 8 more times.


Re: Yes, you are immature.


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 8:06 AM
 

And you had time to literally count those responses? Haha, I'm assuming people are gonna defend you to since I'm betting you have been a member on TigerNet longer? Seems to be the end all be all on this site.


Re: Yes, you are immature.


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 8:36 AM
 

I was just pointing something out,both of yall let it go we are all Tiger fans here regardless of who stacks up on the depth chart you,me,and striper will be pulling for them to succeed.


You're correct, I should have just bowed


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 8:14 AM
 

out. No sense is attempting to discuss and debate on a message board built on discussing and debating Clemson athletics.


Re: Only other senior starter is O'Daniel


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:28 PM
 

A long time till September, but you may be right.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg

null


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:33 PM
 

RS this year I believe. He could get in the mix.


Who does he replace?


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 11:22 AM
 

Wilkins?
Lawrence?
Huggins?
Pagano?



#21


Just giddy at the center of our D Line. Man oh man.***


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:12 PM
 




Bockhorst

[1]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:33 PM
 

had major knee surgery his senior year in high school. I doubt we throw a true freshman - one year post major knee surgery - in a game when so many other options are available.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg

null


John Simpson


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 11:23 AM
 

wondering if Simpson over takes Hearn at LG.


Going be hard keeping BIG JOHN off the field.
#21


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 8:55 PM
 

I think everybody is going to be very happy when they see Chase Brice QB out of Grayson Ga. 6'3" 205 Had 3,000 yards passing this year with 33 TD'S. Won State Championship in 7A. Team finished number 4 in the Nation. Four year starter at big time High School in Georgia. Same school as Wayne Gallman, Ryan Carter and Nick Schuessler. He will be in the mix.

military_donation.jpg

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Posted: Jan 13, 2017 9:09 PM
 

Where are Tucker Israel, Chad Smith, and Sterling Johnson?

2020 white level membermilitary_donation.jpg

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 10:28 PM
 

I don't know maybe partying or in bed sleeping right now. Don't know where they are


I hate to single out one player, but one of our DBs


Posted: Jan 13, 2017 10:47 PM
 

needs to step it up or slide down the depth chart: Van Smith.
He whiffed on several tackles in the Bama game.

And we sure as heck better coach up ALL the DBs to look for the ball. Otherwise we will be watching a PI parade next year. we were fortunate that OSU and Bama didn't have a great passing game.

2020 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg

Our Dline makes for easy work in our secondary.***


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 10:32 AM
 



2020 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg

I'm thinking Rudolph might be Redshirt. Didn't he injure ACL***


Posted: Jan 14, 2017 10:55 PM
 



2020 orange level member

NO FARMERS NO FOOD


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..

[1]
Posted: Jan 14, 2017 11:01 PM
 

Pretty close. Chad smith and specifically Tre Lamar will be hard to keep off the field .

Also on Mullen. Think Mackenzie 2.0. This offseason will be huge for him.

2020 student level member


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 14, 2017 11:06 PM
 

That's what I was trying to explain to certain people on this thread. Mullen is unreal.


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 14, 2017 11:42 PM
 

Muse came in after van smith took the bait on the oj Howard wheel right.

2020 student level member


Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 2:39 AM
 

I believe that Tucker Israel is going to a serious contender for the QB spot. Why is he not listed?

military_donation.jpg

Re: 2017 Depth Chart as of what we have now..


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 6:05 AM
 

I wouldn't count out Brice yet. Someone very close to the program thinks he is good enough to play too. Seems we have a lot more options at QB than I can ever remember.


Looks fairly accurate


Posted: Jan 15, 2017 11:16 AM
 

I am sure Higgins will move up the depth Chart quickly, opposite of Cain.
And I wonder if Lamar will stay at MIKE
Can Simmons claim a starting safety role

#21


Replies: 69  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: 4 tickets in lower deck Sec UO asking 1400 each, email if interested.

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
6277 people have read this post