|
Replies: 19
| visibility 3
|
CU Medallion [18901]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 13655
Joined: 2003
|
For argument's sake, do you think Michigan would have given
Jan 16, 2017, 12:11 PM
|
|
Us a better game in the Fiesta Bowl? They strike me as the exact same team is Ohio State, just less Playmakers on offense. Still I'm going to assume we wouldn't shut them out but I think we still roll easily
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [102348]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 98907
Joined: 2009
|
No, we would have bich slapped them too.***
Jan 16, 2017, 12:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16992]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21895
Joined: 2007
|
Re: For argument's sake, do you think Michigan would have given
Jan 16, 2017, 12:14 PM
|
|
People need to face it, Clemson was the best team in the country in 2016. We are the Champions, no matter who they might put us up against. Not JMO, but proven on the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62710]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62753
Joined: 2007
|
Re: For argument's sake, do you think Michigan would have given
Jan 16, 2017, 1:01 PM
|
|
There isn't any doubt in my mind we were the best team in the country. No other team in the country could have let Bama get a two TD lead and come back in the forth quarter and score 21 points to beat them, no team. Clemson, regardless of how we played the beginning of the season can't erase the way we played in November. In November is when the coaches put all the pieces in the right place, and our team never looked behind them to the way they played early. They felt and played like the champions they showed that they were. The right team won the 2016 NCG. To be the best, you do have to beat who was the best, and Clemson has already done that!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16992]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21895
Joined: 2007
|
Re: For argument's sake, do you think Michigan would have given
Jan 18, 2017, 10:06 AM
|
|
Absolutely! +1
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [4060]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [819]
TigerPulse: 74%
23
|
Is Peppers skipping the game....er....I mean injured?
Jan 16, 2017, 12:17 PM
|
|
I would have loved to have seen that one simply because I wo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [33598]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 36031
Joined: 2003
|
I don't think any1 in the big 10 could have hung
Jan 16, 2017, 12:21 PM
|
|
With clemson that night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27763]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 15116
Joined: 2011
|
My old Friend, 88, answered for me!***
Jan 16, 2017, 12:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [243]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: My old Friend, 88, answered for me!***
Jan 16, 2017, 12:52 PM
|
|
I agree with 88's analysis as well!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1099]
TigerPulse: 79%
25
|
Re: For argument's sake, do you think Michigan would have given
Jan 16, 2017, 12:52 PM
|
|
Teams from up north don't stand a chance!! Go Tigers !!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16181]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
I was confident we'd beat UM if given the chance
Jan 16, 2017, 12:58 PM
|
|
I do think it interesting to ponder how the real big champ penn st would have done. I love that they didnt get the chance though given that their program should have been shut down post Sandusky. Loved seeing them lose to usc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [88593]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 48315
Joined: 2007
|
What? Their program had nothing to do with that sick ####.
Jan 18, 2017, 10:10 AM
|
|
The NCAA had no right to punish Penn State like they did, it was a criminal matter, not athletic.
If any program deserves to be shut down it is UNC, they're blatantly cheating academically for the athletic program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14562]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23635
Joined: 2004
|
Probably but we wouldve beaten them too.***
Jan 16, 2017, 12:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26673]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 15388
Joined: 2000
|
The team that LOST to the team we routed?***
Jan 16, 2017, 1:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2441]
TigerPulse: 98%
32
|
Their defense was good, as was Ohio State's, but they
Jan 16, 2017, 1:38 PM
|
|
would not have been able to score with us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20775]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 18716
Joined: 2012
|
Dont know. Ill say yes because we will never know.***
Jan 16, 2017, 1:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [147]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Re: For argument's sake, do you think Michigan would have given
Jan 18, 2017, 10:34 AM
|
|
A better game?? I thought 31-0 was an awesome game!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [2]
TigerPulse: 93%
1
|
Thanks For Asking Because
Jan 18, 2017, 11:15 AM
|
|
I have thought about this.
Having watched the Team Up North game, I thought Michigan was the stronger looking team. So, yes Michigan would have given Clemson a harder time. Does that make them give us a better game?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [39224]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 51764
Joined: 2004
|
Might have only been 24 or 21-0.
Mar 20, 2011, 3:05 PM
|
|
They wouldn't have scored either, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 3
|
|
|
50
