|
Replies: 40
| visibility 6435
|
Head Coach [910]
TigerPulse: 99%
24
|
Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
3
Feb 15, 2025, 2:28 PM
|
|
Forgot to mention that Clemson is swinging the newer marucci bats and those are much better bats imo never liked Easton.
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [1084]
TigerPulse: 86%
25
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
2
Feb 15, 2025, 2:37 PM
|
|
Doesn’t make a difference
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [910]
TigerPulse: 99%
24
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
2
Feb 15, 2025, 2:55 PM
|
|
Might not with how good college hitters are but ppl that know bats know that the newer marruci bats are way better than any Easton bats. The cat x bats are pretty hot
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7218]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13751
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
2
Feb 15, 2025, 4:13 PM
|
|
Idk about bbcor but usssa easton and rawlings are the king right now. Marucci bats are great too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1544]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [98]
TigerPulse: 91%
10
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 16, 2025, 4:57 PM
[ in reply to Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats! ] |
|
Easton used to be prime with stealth bats. I had a TPX ExO in high school/college. Favorite bat ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3662]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
My engineering mind want to know the different in physics
Feb 26, 2025, 8:25 AM
[ in reply to Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats! ] |
|
between the two.
1- Weight distribution for rotational inertia?
2- Coefficient of restitution?
3- Modulus of Elasticity for the bat?
4- Difference in Reynolds Number due to the smoothness of the bat?
Inquiring minds want to know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [291]
TigerPulse: 97%
14
|
Re: My engineering mind want to know the different in physics
Feb 26, 2025, 10:45 AM
|
|
Gotta be #2 for the biggest difference.
TOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [43338]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11569
Joined: 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [56]
TigerPulse: 97%
6
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
5
5
Feb 15, 2025, 6:45 PM
|
|
As Lee Trevino once said, "It ain't the arrow, it's the Indian."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1084]
TigerPulse: 86%
25
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 15, 2025, 7:40 PM
[ in reply to Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats! ] |
|
Doesn’t make a difference That’s like saying different golf clubs don’t matter?
I bet I can beat you with some old titleist or callaway or mizuno. It’s more about the player
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12604]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3162]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
Feb 26, 2025, 8:16 AM
|
|
Bamboo fishing rods with 10 pound line and a float is all you need. If you have your bat with you it makes a good club to knock out any sword fish from Hartwell puddle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2448]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
2
Feb 15, 2025, 2:39 PM
|
|
Thought we switched when Monroe was here
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2448]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
2
Feb 15, 2025, 2:40 PM
|
|
Montie autocorrect got me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2217]
TigerPulse: 83%
32
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
2
Feb 15, 2025, 2:42 PM
|
|
To Demarini
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7218]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13751
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
3
Feb 15, 2025, 4:12 PM
|
|
Easton makes great bats and has for a long long time. I like Marucci too but I don't think there is much difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1970]
TigerPulse: 87%
31
|
Facts !
2
Feb 15, 2025, 5:49 PM
|
|
Easton tech and material is as good as any
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [910]
TigerPulse: 99%
24
|
Re: Facts !
2
Feb 15, 2025, 7:23 PM
|
|
I’ve swung both bats and marruci is better imo ask the bat bros on YouTube which are famous for reviewing bats they will tell you the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1084]
TigerPulse: 86%
25
|
Re: Facts !
1
Feb 15, 2025, 7:41 PM
|
|
The vols have lville slugger and each team has different and some of the same companies. Does absolutely ridiculous gloves make us catch the ball better or field?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [910]
TigerPulse: 99%
24
|
Re: Facts !
1
Feb 15, 2025, 7:46 PM
|
|
It’s not a big difference all these top brands like Louisville slugger, Easton, Demarini, Marruci etc… are all close I have never been a fan of Easton I think all the others listed are better than them. I think most people would agree with that but at the end of the day the hitters just gotta go hit it’s not some catastrophic difference in these bats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7218]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13751
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Facts !
1
Feb 16, 2025, 3:36 PM
|
|
I don't think Easton is great in bbcor. Not sure why that is because their usssa bats are leading the way right now. Rawlings seem to be doing some good things with bbcor lately tho which Rawlings and easton are the same now. I think most bats are just whatever the hitter prefers. My 8 year old has used an icon, axe avenge pro, and hype fire. All 3 the best composite bats they make. He hits better with the atlas allow bat. Just got him the mach ai so we will see how that one is. It sucks these college kids have to use a certain brand because some may prefer the feel of other bats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6750]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Facts !
1
Feb 15, 2025, 7:52 PM
[ in reply to Re: Facts ! ] |
|
I think PEDs make a bigger difference than the type of bat
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7351]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
are you really comparing impact of difference in glove to difference in bats?***
1
Feb 15, 2025, 7:55 PM
[ in reply to Re: Facts ! ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [910]
TigerPulse: 99%
24
|
Re: are you really comparing impact of difference in glove to difference in bats?***
1
Feb 15, 2025, 8:41 PM
|
|
Yea I agree not a good comparison lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1164]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: are you really comparing impact of difference in glove to difference in bats?***
1
Feb 16, 2025, 4:35 PM
[ in reply to are you really comparing impact of difference in glove to difference in bats?*** ] |
|
Think what he is saying is it's about the player wearing the glove or swimging the bat. If you have a good hitter and a pitcher throwing 94, the good hitter could hit a laser with a 1987 black magic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3803]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 15, 2025, 7:56 PM
|
|
Easton was good in the 80’s
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [355]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
Feb 15, 2025, 8:03 PM
|
|
First I have seen puck knob used as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3802]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 16, 2025, 7:33 AM
|
|
Do they come with built in heaters?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [355]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 16, 2025, 9:59 AM
|
|
Heated bat rolling is illegal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7537]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 16, 2025, 7:47 AM
|
|
Every year they get just a little better.
Each manufacturer finds something new and improves the performance. It changes from year to year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1084]
TigerPulse: 86%
25
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 16, 2025, 1:50 PM
|
|
I mean I’ve got a friend who plays golf and will beat people with his dad’s old clubs. I have a team that some swing Easton’s and best hitters on team. Who cares!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3682]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 16, 2025, 2:12 PM
|
|
Should college go to wood bats like MLB ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [161]
TigerPulse: 98%
12
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 16, 2025, 3:44 PM
|
|
Who’s going to pay for all that wood?
That’s the reason they don’t swing wood in college. Too sand expensive.
Quality wood bats are around $150-200 each. Every hitter needs at least 4 to start then more when they break them (and they will).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2688]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
Some are using Hitting Lab design Marucci's***
1
Feb 16, 2025, 3:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1712]
TigerPulse: 99%
31
|
well we are currently getting mashed by an Easton sponsored team***
2
Feb 16, 2025, 4:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [975]
TigerPulse: 97%
24
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 24, 2025, 12:21 PM
|
|
Any chance those Easton bats are still around?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17169]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 10532
Joined: 2016
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 24, 2025, 6:51 PM
|
|
Marruci has 2 bbcor bats ranked in the top 15 of bbcor bats, while Louisville Slugger has 4 bats ranked in the top 15. Time will tell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1084]
TigerPulse: 86%
25
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 26, 2025, 8:01 AM
|
|
I thought the bats sucked
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3162]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
1
Feb 26, 2025, 8:11 AM
|
|
I have always found bats to be misunderstood. With built in radar and a diet of 678000 mosquitoes per day - plus their ability to transform into Count Chocula ... why is it that bats have never been used as a mascot for a team?
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [603]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: Clemson FINALLY switches from Easton bats!
Feb 26, 2025, 3:01 PM
|
|
Well.... there was this ONE man!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 40
| visibility 6435
|
|
|
50
