Replies: 31
| visibility 12
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Why am I not mad?
Dec 1, 2013, 12:47 AM
|
|
This is the greatest Scar team ever and they won 't sniff SEC title. Our QB for the future is set for the next 5-6 years and they'll all be better than Boyd. Our secondary is going to be sick next year. Our oline will be solid. Wrs coming in are studs. I will say, if Dabo and company lose to Scar next year it will be buh bye. Cause Scar won't be very good
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14587]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13548
Joined: 2001
|
You're making a lot of assumptions there.***
Dec 1, 2013, 12:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Enthusiast [118]
TigerPulse: 54%
11
|
Xanax?***
Dec 1, 2013, 12:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [1007]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
I was gonna get mad about the game, but then I got...
Dec 1, 2013, 12:53 AM
|
|
you know
Very funny comment with the Xanax.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
I assumed Clemson would lose to Scar this year too.
Dec 1, 2013, 12:50 AM
|
|
It's pretty easy. Most people had us losing to FSU/Scar this year and beating everyone else. It 'a not that hard. Talent wise we'll be better next year .
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: I assumed Clemson would lose to Scar this year too.
Dec 1, 2013, 12:53 AM
|
|
You do know South Car. has the youngest team in the Nation this year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [66648]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 24686
Joined: 2011
|
This is not the time for you and your kind to be here
Dec 1, 2013, 1:09 AM
|
|
You won! Your team was better! Your coach coached better! Now, please leave!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [83641]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 63730
Joined: 2007
|
how many SCar games did you watch?
Dec 1, 2013, 12:52 AM
|
|
lost by 11 to UGA, lost to UT barely beat UCF, Kentucky, Vandy and Florida
no way in the name of Sparky Woods is this the best SCar team ever.
|
|
|
|
 |
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: how many SCar games did you watch?
Dec 1, 2013, 12:53 AM
|
|
You do know South Car. has the youngest team in the Nation this year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [83641]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 63730
Joined: 2007
|
is that a good thing or a bad thing?***
Dec 1, 2013, 12:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [1074]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: how many SCar games did you watch?
Dec 1, 2013, 12:56 AM
[ in reply to Re: how many SCar games did you watch? ] |
|
Yea and the seniors and quality juniors are jumping ship. Probably have the youngest team next year too.
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Clemson Legend [105932]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 44238
Joined: 2008
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
You got another Clowney next year?
Dec 1, 2013, 12:59 AM
|
|
And more importantly who's your QB?
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1356]
TigerPulse: 92%
28
|
According to a stat on the video board... SCAR has the
Dec 1, 2013, 1:02 AM
|
|
fewest seniors on their roster. I had to explain that one to a Coot and say that's not a good thing because it means a) players are being run off, b) players aren't graduating and c) APR sucks! Remember, we do have one of the highest APRs in the country. I'd like a win but I'll take balanced classes and even the class of seniors exiting this year and last were part of the dandy dozen.
|
|
|
|
 |
Fan [61]
TigerPulse: 19%
7
|
Re: You got another Clowney next year?
Dec 1, 2013, 1:08 AM
[ in reply to You got another Clowney next year? ] |
|
You know y'all have said that for the last 5 years usc will be worse we are more talented Blah blah. Oh by the way the Same QB that beat you last year
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [66648]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 24686
Joined: 2011
|
Go away!!!!!!!!!!!!*********
Dec 1, 2013, 1:10 AM
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
 |
Fan [71]
TigerPulse: 27%
8
|
Re: You got another Clowney next year?
Dec 1, 2013, 1:12 AM
[ in reply to You got another Clowney next year? ] |
|
its idiots like you that think its all gonna be better next year that keeps us with a hapless head coach. you snd dabo keep cheerleading while the entire sports world snickers at Clemson. only thing dabo has given is the term "##########" that's his legacy.
|
|
|
|
 |
Member [23]
TigerPulse: 26%
3
|
Re: You got another Clowney next year?
Dec 1, 2013, 1:29 AM
[ in reply to You got another Clowney next year? ] |
|
Well, let's see. We beat you the two years before he was here. We beat you the 3 he was here. We beat you with Garcia, Shaw and Thompson. At your house and at our house. With Lattimore and without Lattimore. With our starting point guard catching td passes and with our freshman wide receiver throwing them. We beat you no matter the personnel.
I'm not really worried about it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [153]
TigerPulse: 34%
12
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Lol. You know I'm right.
Dec 1, 2013, 1:10 AM
|
|
Talent level takes a dive next year
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [1039]
TigerPulse: 36%
25
|
Who cares if they sniff the SECCG?? Thats of no matter to
Dec 1, 2013, 1:11 AM
|
|
the rivalry
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Just putting things in perspective.
Dec 1, 2013, 1:14 AM
|
|
Scar has has better talent, especially on defense for the last 5 years. That changes next year for the first time in 5 years
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [29916]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 34830
Joined: 2009
|
better enough to beat us by double digits for 5
Dec 1, 2013, 1:30 AM
|
|
years in a row?
|
|
|
|
 |
Amateur [39]
TigerPulse: 39%
4
|
Re: Why am I not mad?***
Dec 1, 2013, 1:29 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Amateur [39]
TigerPulse: 39%
4
|
Re: Why am I not mad?
Dec 1, 2013, 1:31 AM
|
|
You guys said that when we lost key players over the last few years. I say this only because we *ss hole fans were discussing how much better we will be with a more mature team next year. And yes, we have an experienced QB with a talented backup.
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [1144]
TigerPulse: 53%
26
|
Re: Why am I not mad?
Dec 1, 2013, 1:33 AM
|
|
IMO, the Tiger secondary played "very sick" tonight....matter of fact they made me sick!
|
|
|
|
 |
Fan [65]
TigerPulse: 26%
7
|
You are an idiot!!***
Dec 1, 2013, 1:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
I seriously thought you C0cks
Dec 1, 2013, 1:40 AM
|
|
Would win the SEC East this year with your schedule. I knew you were a good team and could have put up a good shot in the SECCG. That's why I was so glad Mizzou won tonight. You beat that Mizzou team on the road. But seriously next year the talent drop off is going to be drastic combined with your mediocre recruiting. I see a very tough year for you. And You believe in Dylan all you want. But. That dude will not be your starter all year
|
|
|
|
 |
Member [23]
TigerPulse: 26%
3
|
Re: I seriously thought you C0cks
Dec 1, 2013, 2:33 AM
|
|
According to Rivals, we've finished in the top twenty in recruiting 3 straight seasons. How is that mediocre? We will finish in the top twenty again this season. Ya'll have finished ahead of us in each of those seasons, yet we continue to beat ya'll. Hmmm, puzzling.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
#35 this year in rivals.
Dec 1, 2013, 5:23 AM
|
|
Don't even tell me you have anyone as talented as Clowney.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [104]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
lmai, this is the greatest clempson team in 30 years. no tajh, no sammy, at fsy, at georgia, at g tech, and south carolina at home doesn't look good.***
Dec 1, 2013, 2:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Conference [449]
TigerPulse: 91%
17
|
If we couldn't beat South Carolina this year,
Dec 1, 2013, 2:52 AM
|
|
how on earth do you think we'll beat them next year??? Aside from underperformer Clowney and Chaz Sutton, they had a bunch of freshmen and sophomores playing defense. This was their worst defensive team in the past 4 years, but all of their young players will only get better. Our potent offense put up 17 tonight. No Tajh, no Sammy, and probably no Chad next year does not add up to an improvement on offense. It's been so long since we've had a good secondary that I won't believe it until I see it.
Hard to see how we could possibly be anything other than far less likely to win next year.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 31
| visibility 12
|
|
|