|
Replies: 16
| visibility 101
|
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 26%
1
|
Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Nov 9, 2020, 7:45 AM
|
|
Book gave a gritty performance and didn't choke the second half. I have to change my stance on that.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1150]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Nov 9, 2020, 7:46 AM
|
|
Better than who?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 26%
1
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Nov 9, 2020, 7:47 AM
|
|
Then BC's qb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4757]
TigerPulse: 82%
37
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Nov 9, 2020, 8:22 AM
|
|
Doug,
They both played really well against us. I wonder how they graded out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4836]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Nov 9, 2020, 7:47 AM
|
|
I agree. He surprised me. I still think he had the performance of his life and I’m not so sure that will happen again vs us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1215]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Nov 9, 2020, 8:02 AM
|
|
i agree. I had not watched a ND game this year and just going by what i read on here , Ian was incapable of a forward pass . he played very well . congrats to ND looking forward to the rematch
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3430]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
he played well
Nov 9, 2020, 8:04 AM
|
|
against guys not even on our depth chart. Things will be different if we meet up again and are healthy. But yes, he played very well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 26231
Joined: 2011
|
Yes, Book was better QB
Nov 9, 2020, 8:15 AM
|
|
than their second string QB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24894]
TigerPulse: 94%
54
Posts: 17252
Joined: 2002
|
48-3 #KEEPMUSCHAMP
Nov 9, 2020, 8:25 AM
|
|
u6c
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [80102]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 29606
Joined: 2018
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Nov 9, 2020, 9:29 AM
|
|
Gee why don’t you post with original username?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [33255]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 15118
Joined: 2011
|
Who was he originally ? He has an impressive TigerPulse.***
Nov 9, 2020, 9:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [80102]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 29606
Joined: 2018
|
Re: Who was he originally ? He has an impressive TigerPulse.***
Nov 9, 2020, 10:02 AM
|
|
Mr., “I’ve donated for years but can’t remember my password...”
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31975]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 16424
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Who was he originally ? He has an impressive TigerPulse.***
Nov 9, 2020, 11:00 AM
|
|
Mr., “I’ve donated for years but can’t remember my password...”
I think that was another user..
Name started with a C...
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10856]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Book’s OL dominated us
Nov 9, 2020, 9:40 AM
|
|
We didn’t sack him a single time. No matter how much pressure we sent.
We needed Davis to push the pocket and flush him into the pressure. We have nobody that can push the pocket right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1206]
TigerPulse: 98%
27
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Nov 9, 2020, 9:41 AM
|
|
We missed Skalski in managing Book.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [33721]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 36098
Joined: 2003
|
Examples of DJ choking please?***
Nov 9, 2020, 10:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [641]
TigerPulse: 98%
21
|
Re: Book is the better QB we were wrong.
Nov 9, 2020, 11:37 AM
|
|
IMO, it was his elusiveness that was decisive. He missed a bunch of throws, but his escapability gave his receivers, particularly his TEs, time to get open and make plays. Our pass rush was not great, but his keeping plays alive when he was flushed kept numerous drives alive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 16
| visibility 101
|
|
|
50
