Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 104
| visibility 12178

Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

2
3

Jan 1, 2025, 6:20 PM

🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

11

Jan 1, 2025, 6:23 PM

I prefer it over 4 teams

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You don't need 12 teams. 8 is plenty enough

5

Jan 1, 2025, 6:24 PM

Nm

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You don't need 12 teams. 8 is plenty enough

2

Jan 1, 2025, 6:56 PM

Fr I’m surprised they didn’t go to 8 before 12 just to see

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You don't need 12 teams. 8 is plenty enough

2

Jan 1, 2025, 6:59 PM

$$$$

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You don't need 12 teams. 8 is plenty enough

3

Jan 1, 2025, 7:01 PM [ in reply to You don't need 12 teams. 8 is plenty enough ]

Even if you go with 6 or 8 you’re still only gonna have 3 teams that have a chance to win it all.

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"If a pig had a better personality, he would cease to be a filthy animal."


So teams like Boise and ASU and Clemson

3

Jan 1, 2025, 6:25 PM [ in reply to Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke. ]

Can get a participation trophy and a high profile loss? What’s the appeal?

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The appeal is having a chance to win and advance, like we had.

1
2

Jan 1, 2025, 6:28 PM

Better get used to it. It will expand once realignment is done, and maybe before.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Nah. Theres another option rather than

1

Jan 1, 2025, 6:59 PM

Passively accepting the destruction of the sport and the prestige of a national title.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Expanded playoffs are a hit. Theyre not destroying college football.***

1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:03 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So teams like Boise and ASU and Clemson

1
8

Jan 1, 2025, 6:42 PM [ in reply to So teams like Boise and ASU and Clemson ]

This is another bad take. The point is to have a legitimate champion. If you're going to have a NATIONAL championship, you have to play teams all across the nation. You also need a qualification system, not a selection system. Technically we still have that, but having the top five conference champions get in is kind of a de facto qualification system. If you want to supplement that was selections, like the basketball tournament does, that's fine.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So teams like Boise and ASU and Clemson


Jan 3, 2025, 10:44 PM

Decide on a detailed ranking system for every team. Take the five conference champions like this year plus the eleven highest ranked teams who aren't conference champions, seed them according to their ranking regardless of whether they're a conference champion, and go at it. No byes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And, what did we make $4 million?

1
2

Jan 1, 2025, 6:43 PM [ in reply to So teams like Boise and ASU and Clemson ]

Plus I liked playing in the game and showing toughness with a fighting spirit and having a chance. You’re literally saying you didn’t want to go to the playoffs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I want to go to the playoffs when we deserve it.

1

Jan 1, 2025, 7:00 PM

Like we did six times before. I don’t want 9-3 teams anywhere near a national championship because it’s a joke.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I want to go to the playoffs when we deserve it.

1

Jan 1, 2025, 7:30 PM

It's not a joke. You're too hung up being 12-0/11-1 being a requirement to win a national championship.

In the old days, teams got those records because the played maybe one or two teams eith comparable talent. Nebraska and Oklahoma beat up on lousy Big 8 teams. Ohio St. and Michigan beat up on lousy Big Ten teams. Texas beat up on lousy SWC teams, etc.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Max number should ever be is 6 teams with the top two having first round bye.


Jan 2, 2025, 12:50 AM

Teams three thru six play for the 3 and 4 seeds.

That or go back to only 4 teams.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not happening, sooo***

1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:22 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Max number should ever be is 6 teams with the top two having first round bye.

1

Jan 2, 2025, 3:53 PM [ in reply to Max number should ever be is 6 teams with the top two having first round bye. ]

No it shouldn't. The reason college football is like it is, it's because the national championship used to be a popularity contest, so the best players and coaches would go to those schools cuz that was your pretty much only chance to win a National championship. Now that you more teens able to get into the playoffs and have a legitimate shot, you'll see some other teams get some better players and overtime you'll see some other teams be able to compete.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They played comparable schedules to everyone else...


Jan 2, 2025, 12:57 AM [ in reply to Re: I want to go to the playoffs when we deserve it. ]

so why should a 9-3 team, that bungled some of those easy games and/or proved themselves less than elite against the good teams on their schedule, get a shot?

Yes, I'm hung up on being the best team from start to finish being emphasized over getting in and getting hot at the end.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We did deserve it.***

1
1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:03 AM [ in reply to I want to go to the playoffs when we deserve it. ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I want to go to the playoffs when we deserve it.


Jan 2, 2025, 1:42 AM [ in reply to I want to go to the playoffs when we deserve it. ]

If we expand further there’s no way you won’t see 9-3 and 8-4 teams in. Make it like the FCS playoffs!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So teams like Boise and ASU and Clemson

2

Jan 1, 2025, 6:59 PM [ in reply to So teams like Boise and ASU and Clemson ]

Dog….Clemson competed against that Texas team and had a chance.

If Wes Goodwin is not on staff we win that game

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Texas wouldnt have been in the four either


Jan 1, 2025, 7:02 PM

Most likely. Two losses and no conference title. Probably Oregon Georgia notre dame Penn State. Which is all that really deserve to be there to begin with.


Message was edited by: ClemsonPoker489®


2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Texas wouldnt have been in the four either

1

Jan 1, 2025, 7:32 PM

Again this is a dumb take. The old way of college football is just to sell for filling prophecy. The reason only a couple of teams were National Championship caliber has caused you decided that it's beginning of the season. The more you start having an expanded playoff you'll see that these teams better presumed to be the only contenders will start losing.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Maybe, because now they have extra games to dodge bad injury luck...


Jan 2, 2025, 12:59 AM

Give me a team that was deserving, but due to early season rankings didn't get a real shot? The best you can do is like the undefeated UCF team, which would have gotten curb stomped by the big boys, especially if they had to play two or more of them.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Maybe, because now they have extra games to dodge bad injury luck...


Jan 2, 2025, 1:45 AM

So you want the old ways and old days where the national championship is between 2 teams with either an 11-1 or 12-0 record? F THAT?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

4 was perfect, but two was usually fine


Jan 2, 2025, 3:54 PM

once we got a system in place where 1 played 2 every year.

And yes, I want the old days when every game mattered and there were few or no mulligans, when teams were punished for losing games. Now we have a team in that very well might win it all despite choking at home against a barely bowl eligible Michigan team, and the "bubble" teams are like Alabama, who lost to ####### Vanderbilt and got curbstomped by a ###### OU team. They still had people claiming they deserved to play for a national title. Devalues the whole thing.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Texas wouldnt have been in the four either


Jan 1, 2025, 7:58 PM [ in reply to Texas wouldnt have been in the four either ]

Texas was literally in the Top 4 of the rankings this year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And the regular season was more than enough to show


Jan 2, 2025, 1:00 AM

that they didn't deserve to be in the top four at the end. Yet they're still alive. Oh boy, if we're lucky they'll get a THIRD shot to beat the same Georgia team that has beaten them twice. Yay.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

According to you??

1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:13 AM

How about Texas was 3rd in the final CFP rankings, and yes, they would have been in 4 team format.

Please just accept the fact expanded playoffs are here to stay and will only expand like the NFL.

You can belly ache all you want and it’s not going to change.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm under no delusion that the tradition of the sport


Jan 2, 2025, 1:23 AM

or the prestige of a true national title are going to win the day against money. Watching you cheerlead media corporations watering down college football so they can make a few extra million dollars is wild, though. What do fans get out of it? A few extra crappy football games and the chance that their team who choked, at home, against barely bowl eligible Michigan can win a "national championship." Bleh. The rare case when a real elite team has to go through several extra teams, that will benefit their legacy. Most of the champions from here on out won't be on par with the historical teams like 2018 Clemson, 2019 LSU, etc. Eventually some 9-3 team will get a great draw and their opponents will have crappy injury luck and we'll have a truly fraudulent champion.

And no, I don't believe for a second that Texas would have been given a third chance over a team like Notre Dame if the committee were fashioning a four team playoff.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Texas was 3rd and it had nothing to do with expanded playoffs.

1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:31 AM

Please save the verbose replies dude. You can’t make up your own reality.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sorry to tax your attention span.***


Jan 2, 2025, 3:49 PM



2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Really man ? Thats your best reply?

1

Jan 3, 2025, 7:05 PM

The expanded playoffs are a hit and will be growing in the future.

2 of the 4 teams remaining in the CFP wouldn’t have made the CFP in the old format. If 50% doesn’t prove the point, then you’re just being needlessly hard headed.

Again, if you feel you have an objective reply then please keep it succinct and to the point. Thank you.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I'm under no delusion that the tradition of the sport

1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:48 AM [ in reply to I'm under no delusion that the tradition of the sport ]

Save these brain dead takes. Regardless of record. IF you get into the playoff and you make your way to the final game and win it, you are the national champions. Bottom line. There is no fraud, or “Mickey mouse” title… every team has to play the games….

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So teams like Boise and ASU and Clemson


Jan 2, 2025, 1:28 AM [ in reply to So teams like Boise and ASU and Clemson ]

Personally I wanna see it go to the top 24 teams. That would be awesome and two months of football. Do it exactly like FCS does.

“The 2024-25 FCS playoffs will have a 24-team bracket that will have the top 16 teams seeded and the top eight seeds receiving automatic byes to the second round. The rest of the 24-team field (the remaining 16 teams) will play in the first round.”

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Why not 64? Hell why not 128 and seed it randomly.


Jan 2, 2025, 4:03 PM

Who needs a regular season anyway? Just 127 made-for-TV exhibitions should be plenty.

What a joke.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why not 64? Hell why not 128 and seed it randomly.


Jan 3, 2025, 6:05 PM

Sound excellent!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not sure how anyone could have expected different.

7

Jan 1, 2025, 6:24 PM

In the history of college football there has never been a season where 12 teams were legitimate national title contenders and there never will be. This isn’t the NFL. There’s no mechanism to promote parity, less so now with NIL and the portal.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We were 12. We were close. Would you rather have not played ?***

1

Jan 1, 2025, 6:37 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We were close to losing later.


Jan 1, 2025, 7:03 PM

And yes I’d rather not be a sacrificial lamb in a bloated tournament that will inevitably devalue the national championship itself.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: We were 12. We were close. Would you rather have not played ?***


Jan 1, 2025, 8:36 PM [ in reply to We were 12. We were close. Would you rather have not played ?*** ]

We were not close

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yes we were. The 77 yard run and a FG was had

1

Jan 2, 2025, 12:54 AM

in the second half. We made a great run and made it a great game and were close to making it even better. Yes, we were close. Had more passing yards and TDs than any other team.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Not sure how anyone could have expected different.

2

Jan 1, 2025, 6:39 PM [ in reply to Not sure how anyone could have expected different. ]

There are not 12 "legitimate" title contenders in the NFL either, but they still have that many teams, and more, in the playoffs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yes and forever people have been saying

1

Jan 1, 2025, 7:04 PM

“College football is just too unique with its meaningful regular season. Make it more like every other sport and water it down.”

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Yes and forever people have been saying

1

Jan 1, 2025, 7:57 PM

The regular season never was more meaningful.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How is it more meaningful when a team can lose to the three


Jan 2, 2025, 1:03 AM

toughest teams on their schedule and still be alive for a national championship?

Texas and Georgia played twice and neither game meant anything beyond seeding.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Not sure how anyone could have expected different.

2

Jan 1, 2025, 6:58 PM [ in reply to Not sure how anyone could have expected different. ]

You haven’t had nil and transfers. Let’s not forget that number 15 just lost in ot to number 5. Why on earth are people complaining about more football.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

This is the most delusional take.


Jan 1, 2025, 7:13 PM

You watch year after year as money teams poach whoever they want from the mid level schools and you think this will *increase* parity?

You think there would be *less* parity if Mukuba were still at Clemson and Jordan Burch were still at South Carolina?

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Not sure how anyone could have expected different.


Jan 1, 2025, 6:58 PM [ in reply to Not sure how anyone could have expected different. ]

Who gives a crap. Its more football.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


More is not always better.

1

Jan 1, 2025, 7:08 PM

Other than the networks getting fat on high ad revenue who has benefitted from having like six extra blowout games?

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yes, but none of the first round games were very competitive football.

1
2

Jan 1, 2025, 8:11 PM [ in reply to Re: Not sure how anyone could have expected different. ]

Most people don’t want to see all games with double digit margins of victory.

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"All those 'Fire Brownell' guys can kiss it." -Joseph Girard III

"Everybody needs to know that Coach Brownell is arguably the best coach to come through Clemson." -PJ Hall


Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

1

Jan 1, 2025, 6:28 PM

I would much rather have 12 team playoffs than 14 playoff.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

2

Jan 1, 2025, 6:31 PM

Its going to 16. Think they need to use the Bowl games. Hey, and wasn't Texas a double digit favorite over A State? there have been a few interesting games. You will get a little of both good games and blow outs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Exactly.***

1

Jan 1, 2025, 6:36 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

5

Jan 1, 2025, 6:30 PM

The Texas /ASU game was a great game!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 1, 2025, 8:37 PM

So top 8.that's what he said basically. 12 teams is a joke

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And we've only had to suffer through six snoozers to get it.***


Jan 2, 2025, 1:05 AM [ in reply to Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke. ]



2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There have been *snoozers* in the 4 team format.

1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:08 AM

So?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yes, because usually there aren't even four teams that deserve to


Jan 2, 2025, 1:25 AM

play for a national championship, but three happens often enough that four is the right number. Many years of the four team format, the old two team format would have been fine.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Yes, because usually there aren't even four teams that deserve to

1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:52 AM

🤡🤡🤡

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

But we were a DC away from a win and a deep run, right?

1

Jan 1, 2025, 6:35 PM

The 12 team playoff provides an opportunity for more teams, and will expand soon. It’s not going anywhere, and it’s more fun than a 4-team playoff. Plus we made a bunch of millions to play in it, and nearly served an upset. Sooner or later there will be upsets or two, and as it is teams like Notre Dame and Ohio State wouldn’t have made a 4-team playoff. I’m thinking Buckeye fans like the new format.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Notre Dame 100% would have been in a 4 team.

1

Jan 1, 2025, 7:24 PM

Oregon notre dame and Georgia were the locks. Fourth spot would have probably been Penn State.

I’m sure Ohio State fans are happy that their loss to Michigan was rendered irrelevant and potentially even helped them. I don’t really give a #### about the happiness of those douchebags though.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Notre Dame was ranked 5th to end the season.***


Jan 1, 2025, 7:54 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If it were still four teams I think they'd have been locked in over Texas.


Jan 2, 2025, 1:08 AM

The rankings don't matter much when ND isn't eligible for a top four seed and the committee knows they aren't getting left out. It changes the arithmetic. Texas would have been viewed as having had their shot to prove they belonged and failed twice, once at home.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I guess youre free to *think* whatever you want, but

1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:21 AM

Texas was 3rd and would have been in a 4-team playoff. I’m not sure what you’re arguing otherwise.

Neither ND nor OSU were in the top 4. OSU was 8th. If you were a Buckeye you’d be a happy dude tonight.

Thing is, it’s 12 and will be 16. What good does all the bellyaching do? None. Are you going to stop watching the games?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I can't spell it out any simpler.


Jan 2, 2025, 1:35 AM

They were ranked third in a 12 team format. That doesn't mean they would have been ranked third in a four team format. I don't believe they would have been, based on how the committee historically ranked teams at the end of seasons under the four team format. You are also free to believe as you wish, neither of us can prove the other wrong, but it's clear to me that a two loss team with no conference title wouldn't have been ranked above one loss Notre Dame.

I don't know why you keep bringing up Ohio State. They didn't deserve to be playing for a national championship, but with twelve teams everyone and their brother gets in...kind of my entire point. It's watered down. Their losses to Oregon and Michigan are rendered irrelevant because they're virtually guaranteed to be in every single year. Just what I always wanted, more Ohio State football to watch.

I'm sure they are happy, and will even convince themselves, if they win out, that this team is just as deserving as undefeated and one loss teams who won during the four and two team eras, but they aren't. They picked the right year to start choking, the first year that choking away a win wouldn't cost them, that's all.

And yeah, I'm trending towards stopping watching, though it being the only sporting event on at the time and historic inertia of just "I'm a college football fan," will likely carry me through a couple more seasons. Eventually it'll just be too sad, though, watching some lesser than team get a good draw and good luck and win a "national championship." Knowing what it used to take to call yourself that and comparing it to teams like Texas and Ohio State who played their way out only to be saved by a money grab....just pathetic.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

LOL. Youre just flat out wrong.

1

Jan 3, 2025, 10:56 PM

Texas was 3rd in the final CFP rankings. That means they would have gotten in regardless of a 12 team format. Surely you can’t be that lost?

Likewise, neither ND nor Ohio State were in the final CFP top 4. And now they’re in the final 4. This is a great example of why playoff expansion is a good thing.

You scored zero points in this discussion buddy. Sorry.

Look, you don’t like expanded playoffs but you’re in a VERY small group. I mean really small. That, and they’re not going anywhere and they will expand along with conference realignment.

The expanded playoffs are here to stay. So how many days/months/years will you spend energy complaining about it? I’m sorry man, I just don’t understand complaining about things that won’t change. It’s wasted energy - kind of like all the words you typed. Why? You didn’t win this debate sir, especially when you can’t understand the facts.

Take care. Go Tigers!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wrong on ND and Ohio State. ND was 5th and OSU was 8th in the final CFP

1

Jan 2, 2025, 12:59 AM [ in reply to Notre Dame 100% would have been in a 4 team. ]

rankings. ND has advanced and playing for the final 4 while 8th seed OSU is already in.

They like expanded playoffs just like we did. You’re an an island if you say you would rather not make the playoffs then to make it and lose.

Again, $4M and we made a helluva game of it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Notre Dame 100% would have been in a 4 team.


Jan 2, 2025, 1:54 AM [ in reply to Notre Dame 100% would have been in a 4 team. ]

I mean we could also say that our loss to SC was rendered irrelevant as well as we won the ACC and were selected and played in the CFP, no?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

1

Jan 1, 2025, 6:36 PM

It hasn't been a joke. This is a dumb take. As the expanded playoff goes on, some of this talent's going to get distributed out through the teams, because players know that they can win a championship at other places besides a handful of blue blood schools.

The one thing that would be smart to do is just seed the teams based on the rankings and not have the conference Champions get first round byes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Few kids care about championships


Jan 1, 2025, 7:30 PM

Vs cold hard cash. The premier talent will continue to collect at a handful of money schools. Oregon, OSU, Texas, A&M, Georgia and Alabama if they can continue throwing money at kids etc.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Few kids care about championships


Jan 1, 2025, 7:55 PM

No, they care about championships, and playing time.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 1, 2025, 6:50 PM

Overall disappointing minus today’s earlier game.

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

MEG


Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

1
1

Jan 1, 2025, 6:55 PM

Disagree. Really didn’t much care about any bowl game outside CFP since CFP started. Now we have more meaningful games, even if they’re blowouts. Now we are pretty sure the right four teams are in there somewhere.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

2

Jan 1, 2025, 7:28 PM

The 4 team format is best IMO. It didn't screw the #1 team in regards to who they faced.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 1, 2025, 7:50 PM

That’s fixed by awarding the byes to Top 4 and putting automatic bids where their ranking places them.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 1, 2025, 8:40 PM [ in reply to Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke. ]

None of these games resulted in upsets. Texas game was close but no cigar. 6 teams to 8 teams until there's a salary cap and other rules to increase parity. The nfl has already proven this. It's not rocket science. Be a student of history and not a minion of espn and media hype.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wrong. OSU wouldnt have made a 4-team playoff, but theyre in the final four no

1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:02 AM

after knocking off #1. There will be more of this now that we’re in expanded playoffs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

More of one money team getting beat by another money team


Jan 2, 2025, 1:14 AM

that had more regular season losses? Yeah.

Actual underdogs fighting through three or four games vs the money powers? Nope.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not sure what your point is?

1

Jan 2, 2025, 1:27 AM

You were wrong about Texas and ND. Ohio State was 8th and wouldn’t have even had a shot. Not sure where you’re going with your tangent.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah, you seem unable to grasp my points repeatedly.


Jan 2, 2025, 1:39 AM

Which is fine, but I can't understand it for you so I'm not sure what you want me to do.

Ohio State SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD A SHOT. They lost, twice, once at home to a mediocre team. That is not what historically constitutes a national championship caliber team. But we live in a new world where even three loss teams get a chance. It's watered down, that's my point. The national championship itself is lesser now that so many teams are included in the "deserving" category. Four was plenty and often too many to begin with. The expansion didn't solve a problem because there was no problem, it's not intended as a solution, it's intended to increase someone's bottom line and the prestige, history, tradition and what made college football unique and special be ######.

2025 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgtnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Your *points* are baseless opinions.

1

Jan 3, 2025, 11:03 PM

My points are facts.

Sorry dude. Go Tigers!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Nope******

1

Jan 1, 2025, 7:32 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

12 teams is too many 4 not enough how about 6 teams


Jan 1, 2025, 7:47 PM

Top 2 get 1st round bye

2025 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 1, 2025, 7:49 PM

Probably going to end up with 4 of the biggest brands (Ohio State, Penn State, Texas and (UGA or Notre Dame) in the Final four. No different than the Four team playoff we had. Just now it will probably be all SEC and B1G representation which is what they wanted to begin with.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 1, 2025, 7:51 PM

Fixing the seeding process would help…

2025 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 1, 2025, 7:56 PM

Prefer it over the 4 team one.

The Committee got it right.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 1, 2025, 7:59 PM

It's been awesome!

The logic behind the automatic byes have been the joke...ASU and Boise having a buy is laughable.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln


Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 1, 2025, 7:59 PM

They will eventually go to 16 teams due to Tv $$$$$$$$$$$.

2025 purple level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

1

Jan 1, 2025, 7:59 PM

It’s been great

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I've rather enjoyed it. Made the last 3 weeks of the regular season

1

Jan 1, 2025, 8:20 PM

exciting.
But make no mistake. We always knew the bottom teams were going to have a hard time advancing. I'm looking to the rumors being true that 4 more teams will be added within the next few years.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 1, 2025, 8:35 PM

I said it. I agree.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

1

Jan 1, 2025, 8:38 PM

Doesn’t matter how many teams you go with.. 4 teams still had blowouts.. when it was two you still had blowouts.. 12 teams just reduced opt outs and increases views (making more money). The first few out will always complain even if you do 64. At least now the final four had to earn a spot.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

1
1

Jan 1, 2025, 9:31 PM

It's been fun...

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not long ago we saw teams crowned without challenge.


Jan 2, 2025, 4:07 PM

I'm thinking ND and OU being in the championship games during the BCS era and getting blown out by someone who actually had a decent team. Sacrifices to the gods ND, Oregon and others became and the only people who believe the NC deserved that crown were the fans of the two teams that played in those games.

The PO since year one has produced a true national champ. That's something, everything we wanted a cried about for decades.

I swear, if you guys didn't fart, belch or bich you'd bust!

2025 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

1
1

Jan 3, 2025, 6:58 PM

speak for yourself, I have enjoyed it.

tnet-military.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah I imagine its hard to find people who dont like it better.***

2

Jan 3, 2025, 7:10 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.

1
1

Jan 3, 2025, 9:17 PM

Wrong. It's awesome, and the fans are eating it up.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 3, 2025, 11:07 PM

The 12 team playoff was to get more eyeballs around the country to watch the games. There's only about 4 or 5 team actually capable of winning it all.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 3, 2025, 11:19 PM

I am enjoying the playoffs format. It needs to be tweaked. No byes and no home field games to start with. Clemson had a chance and so did ASU to pull an upset. Fun stuff in my opinion. Plus as much as I hate OSU, they are peaking at the right moment. They never would have made the 4 team format. Neither would Clemson this year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 3, 2025, 11:21 PM

I was the 100th comment. Cool.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 4, 2025, 6:43 AM

There have certainly been many non-competitive games but I think the biggest joke is having teams with a 6-6 or 7-6 record in a bowl game. Having said that, I know it's all about the money...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 4, 2025, 9:07 AM

Nope

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lets face it. The 12 team playoff has been an absolute joke.


Jan 4, 2025, 9:20 AM

I know the top 4 would be different if it was only a 4 team field, but I find it funny that the final 4 are outside of the top 4

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 104
| visibility 12178
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic