|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1893
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 46543
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Ranking Clemson's top opposition at QB in 2025
1
May 1, 2025, 7:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [39331]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 33504
Joined: 2011
|
Re: TNET: Ranking Clemson's top opposition at QB in 2025
3
May 1, 2025, 7:25 AM
|
|
Sellars and Jennings are both better than Nussmeyer , in this fan's opinion.
At least , from the athletic standpoint and being able to create the play after the called play breaks down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7993]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 10778
Joined: 2007
|
love Woodaz but I wouldn't use that photo from that game...
3
May 1, 2025, 8:35 AM
|
|
he was getting shook out of his shoes on those plays against Sellers. He wasn't the only one. Not really his fault as it was more the repetitive game plan to match up one of our linebackers as a spy to stop his running ability. Which failed for at least 3 of the 4 qtrs.
I'm sitting here shaking my head at that photo knowing Sellers is about to cut up field and run for about 30 yards. Its bad when you're watching a game knowing an opponent (especially our rival) is owning the moment and there apparently is nothing we're gonna do about it.
I know Coach Allen has watched the film on that game and hopefully knows the solution to that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7919]
TigerPulse: 98%
42
|
pretty sure this was the case vs every QB1 in 2024***
2
May 1, 2025, 8:43 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7919]
TigerPulse: 98%
42
|
my apologies ... The App State QB1 didn't make the defense look like a HS Def
2
May 1, 2025, 8:44 AM
|
|
even the Citadel ran straight up the defense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62738]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62768
Joined: 2007
|
Re: my apologies ... The App State QB1 didn't make the defense look like a HS Def
2
May 1, 2025, 9:31 AM
|
|
The only thing that made Goodwin into DC, was Dabo naming him as our DC, other than that he was no more of a DC than I am, and I wouldn't know where to begin!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9858]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 11146
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9858]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 11146
Joined: 2003
|
14, sorry***
2
May 1, 2025, 9:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62738]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62768
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1058]
TigerPulse: 99%
25
|
From a pure running ability Sellers should easily be #1
2
May 1, 2025, 8:56 AM
|
|
Nussmeyer is an above avg QB with a decent arm but our DBs will shut him down for the most part. Sellers is like trying to tackle a fullback with the ability to throw the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14571]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23641
Joined: 2004
|
Yall are underrating Nussmeier IMO
3
May 1, 2025, 9:05 AM
|
|
I think he's much better than above average, and I'd rather face Sellers unless Sellers has improved alot as a passer. Sure he's a dangerous runner, but I have faith that Tom Allen is going to shore up our tackling and run defense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9858]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 11146
Joined: 2003
|
Still TICKED over the 2022 and 2024 chicken games.
4
May 1, 2025, 9:10 AM
|
|
Flat out failures on our part!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14573]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13539
Joined: 2001
|
Re: Still TICKED over the 2022 and 2024 chicken games.
1
May 1, 2025, 4:53 PM
|
|
You and me both!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62738]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62768
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: Ranking Clemson's top opposition at QB in 2025
3
May 1, 2025, 9:18 AM
|
|
OK, I can give the coot QB his props on being a decent as a dual threat QB but, he really wasn't as good against us as some may have thought he was. I think by him getting away with a couple of jail breaks made him look to be better than he actually was. Also, he was playing against a Wes Goodwin defense but IMO if BV would have been our DC he would have pretty much been shut bc BV had gotten really good with shutting down dual threat QBs. Even under a make-believe Goodwin coached D they only won by a FG...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1253]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: TNET: Ranking Clemson's top opposition at QB in 2025
1
May 1, 2025, 4:44 PM
|
|
Good. I like having highly regarded teams and QBs playing against us. It enhances our chances for the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2305]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: TNET: Ranking Clemson's top opposition at QB in 2025
1
May 1, 2025, 4:50 PM
|
|
Watching Sellars was as frustrating as watching Connor Shaw
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12361]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 14722
Joined: 2014
|
Re: TNET: Ranking Clemson's top opposition at QB in 2025
1
May 2, 2025, 10:28 AM
|
|
None of the three qbs we lost to, Sellars, Shough, and Beck, were great last year. I'd say a bit better than average. A quality Clemson D would have shut all three of them down. Even the Texas qb was good but not great. Again, our run defense stunk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [873]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: TNET: Ranking Clemson's top opposition at QB in 2025
May 2, 2025, 3:22 PM
|
|
I hope our pass defense last year was because we had so little pass rush. Here is where we Ranked.
Name G Att Comp Pct. Yards Yards/Att TD Int Rating Att/G Yards/G
Clemson 14 467 263 56.3 2989 6.4 22 16 118.78 33.4 213.5
Ranking 53
Another ranking page using a little different metric had us ranked 66th.
We need to be much better imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1893
|
|
|
50
