Replies: 35
| visibility 5004
|
Athletic Dir [1100]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Can anyone verify this INSANE stat?
3
Dec 16, 2024, 7:55 PM
|
|
Just watched Josh Pate predict we lose by at least 13.
The crazy stat: Clemson is 0-13 on the road vs AP top 5 teams.
Can anyone verify??
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1595]
TigerPulse: 99%
30
|
Re: Can anyone verify this INSANE stat?
2
Dec 16, 2024, 7:56 PM
|
|
It’s true.
The top ranked games Clemson has played in and won, we’ve been lucky enough to have at home. Especially recently.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18526]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12076
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Can anyone verify this INSANE stat?
Dec 16, 2024, 8:43 PM
|
|
Or neutral field, maybe?
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8238]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 16107
Joined: 2001
|
Weve won quite a few on a neutral field. All 3
1
Dec 16, 2024, 11:58 PM
|
|
National titles + playoff semis. Don’t know about other bowls.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [136]
TigerPulse: 62%
11
|
Don't you think most teams mirror that stat? You don't beat top 5 teams at their
2
Dec 16, 2024, 8:29 PM
|
|
place.
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1392]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
Re: Don't you think most teams mirror that stat? You don't beat top 5 teams at their
Dec 16, 2024, 8:51 PM
|
|
Most teams do have similar stats, but a number of the national title contenders have better records against top 5 teams away. Ohio State is 12-14 in top 5 matchups this century, and about half of those were away games. Kirby Smart is 3-1. Alabama has the best record in away games against top 5 teams, but didn't count all of them since they're not playing.
To be fair, it is a misleading stat, since it doesn't take into account neutral games and Dabo actually hasn't had that many top 5 away games. By my count, Dabo is only 0-4 against top 5 teams away. We lost to Auburn in 2010 in overtime. We lost to South Carolina in 2013. We lost to Florida State in 2014. And we lost to Notre Dame in 2020.
What we did in the 1970s is pretty irrelevant to me.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1574]
TigerPulse: 95%
30
|
Re: Don't you think most teams mirror that stat? You don't beat top 5 teams at their
Dec 17, 2024, 9:03 AM
|
|
Auburn was #17 and Douth Carolina was #10.
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1392]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
Re: Don't you think most teams mirror that stat? You don't beat top 5 teams at their
1
Dec 17, 2024, 12:42 PM
|
|
As I said below, to get the 0-13 number Pate used, you have to use the teams that were top 5 at the end of the year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14617]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 23688
Joined: 2004
|
That's clearly the more sensible way of doing it too***
Dec 17, 2024, 1:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8238]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 16107
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1836]
TigerPulse: 88%
31
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8602]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4843]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Was VT in 2011 not top 5?
Dec 16, 2024, 8:33 PM
|
|
Thought they were like #3 that year
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1595]
TigerPulse: 99%
30
|
Re: Was VT in 2011 not top 5?
Dec 16, 2024, 8:34 PM
|
|
No they were 11th, not even a top 10 win.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4843]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
They were #5 when we beat them in ACCCG that year
Dec 16, 2024, 8:42 PM
|
|
Thought it was on the road. They were #11 when we played at VT. My b
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20868]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14650
Joined: 2009
|
This is referencing Away games - not Neutral site I believe.***
Dec 16, 2024, 8:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
1st Rounder [674]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: Can anyone verify this INSANE stat?
2
Dec 16, 2024, 8:38 PM
|
|
He whiffed on his prediction that SMU would beat us so he’s doubling down on the next one.
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [1100]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: Can anyone verify this INSANE stat?
Dec 16, 2024, 8:42 PM
|
|
I hope he eats his words! I really like Pate but the fact that he’s taking Texas by that much is… shocking
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Sports Icon [59604]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 45187
Joined: 2003
|
So the odds are in our favor....***
1
Dec 16, 2024, 8:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [30991]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 11277
Joined: 2013
|
Re: So the odds are in our favor....***
1
Dec 16, 2024, 9:00 PM
|
|
My first thought too spud. 0-13.....the boys are due
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1836]
TigerPulse: 88%
31
|
It's human nature to interpret this stat as clear evidence the trend...
Dec 17, 2024, 2:55 PM
[ in reply to So the odds are in our favor....*** ] |
|
will continue but you're correct statistically speaking-
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18526]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12076
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Can anyone verify this INSANE stat?
Dec 16, 2024, 8:44 PM
|
|
How many true top 5 road games have Clemson even played since Dabo took over?
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18526]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12076
Joined: 2007
|
Dabo is 0-3 in this category
Dec 16, 2024, 8:48 PM
|
|
2 losses to FSU, by 12 and 6 1 loss to Notre Dame by 7.
I like are odds even more now.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18526]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12076
Joined: 2007
|
Our***
Dec 16, 2024, 8:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1392]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
Re: Dabo is 0-3 in this category
1
Dec 16, 2024, 8:58 PM
[ in reply to Dabo is 0-3 in this category ] |
|
The 0-13 number only works if he's talking about our all-time record against teams ending the season in the top 5. By that metric, Dabo's losses are 2010 Auburn, 2013 South Carolina, 2014 FSU, and 2020 ND.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [18526]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12076
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Dabo is 0-3 in this category
Dec 16, 2024, 11:20 PM
|
|
I pulled from Sports Reference which, I believe, is ranking at the time played. Either way, 0-3 or 0-4, in mostly closely contested games is not some giant red flag.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20062]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
Re: Can anyone verify this INSANE stat?
Dec 16, 2024, 8:45 PM
|
|
Or at neutral sites
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [80141]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 29620
Joined: 2018
|
Did you hear where the coots were
Dec 16, 2024, 8:47 PM
|
|
butthurt about missing the playoffs? 😂 They'll never make it, 😂
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20062]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
Re: Did you hear where the coots were
Dec 16, 2024, 8:49 PM
|
|
Wait I found a win t #5 UGA in 2013 38-35!
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20062]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
Re: Did you hear where the coots were
1
Dec 16, 2024, 8:50 PM
|
|
Sorry. It was in the Valley.
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [30991]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 11277
Joined: 2013
|
Re: Did you hear where the coots were
Dec 16, 2024, 9:02 PM
|
|
I was at that game....longest day in tiger town in my life. Awesome memories
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8204]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
We will win by at least one point!***
Dec 16, 2024, 8:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20062]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
Re: Can anyone verify this INSANE stat?
1
Dec 16, 2024, 8:51 PM
|
|
Looks like most if not all were at FSU.
|
|
|
|
 |
Solid Orange [1395]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
Re: Can anyone verify this INSANE stat?
Dec 16, 2024, 9:13 PM
|
|
I will say we’ve hardly played in games that fit this. Most recent ones I can think of are Notre Dame in 2020 and…I can’t even recall beyond that
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [8079]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Winning at Texas will be among the best ever wins in Clemson history
1
Dec 17, 2024, 8:06 AM
|
|
Road game, Austin, TX, Longhorns top 5 team College football playoff first round Saturday afternoon on a huge college campus Texas has 2 elite QB's, not just 1...totally different styles, hard to scheme/prepare
Clemson is a big dog in this game, which makes sense. Texas lost to 1 team 2 times this year, and they played the 2nd game much stronger and had chances to win that game. That same team, beat our Tigers by 4 TD's. Does that really mean anything, maybe not since it was 1st game of season...but it is a fact
This Saturday is a big opportunity, Tigers will have to play their best game of the season. It is a very significant game, and a chance for Clemson to prove a lot of people wrong,
Go Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8238]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 16107
Joined: 2001
|
Tigers looking to go 4-0 in postseason games in Texas
Dec 17, 2024, 12:12 PM
|
|
that’s another meaningless stat for you.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 35
| visibility 5004
|
|
|