|
Replies: 12
| visibility 2653
|
TigerNet GOAT [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 12184
Joined: 1995
|
Recruit Update: Montravius Adams to visit Alabama
Oct 26, 2012, 3:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4774]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
Oh don't mind us...
Oct 26, 2012, 3:52 PM
|
|
We've only been co-leaders for the entirety of his recruitment. No big deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [65]
TigerPulse: 87%
7
|
Exactly what I was thinking***
Oct 26, 2012, 4:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [156]
TigerPulse: 88%
12
|
Re: Oh don't mind us...
Oct 26, 2012, 5:14 PM
[ in reply to Oh don't mind us... ] |
|
I am not liking our chances as Montravius, twitter shows him following 38 entities, many with obvious ties to Florida, Alabama, Georgia, and Auburn... Zero recognizable as Clemson.
@montravius_m
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [67135]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 24738
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Oh don't mind us...
Oct 27, 2012, 1:49 AM
|
|
Is that really him? Last I heard he didn't have a Twitter account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10883]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12942
Joined: 2012
|
Unfortunately, in a video interview of Adams a few weeks ago
Oct 26, 2012, 10:58 PM
[ in reply to Oh don't mind us... ] |
|
he commented directly on people saying Clemson and Auburn being his leaders. He said that that rumor wasn't true...that everyone has a fair shot.
Sucks, hope Dabo uses his voodoo on this kid. He's a must get.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
46
Posts: 14500
Joined: 2011
|
With all the depth we have of youth and Pagano
Oct 26, 2012, 11:12 PM
|
|
he isn't a must get, but would be a stud
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1910]
TigerPulse: 99%
31
|
While he may not be a "must get"
Oct 26, 2012, 11:48 PM
|
|
He's the closest you can get to that as you can. He would come in competing for a starting spot IMO. and with the current D-line class already committed, plus MAYBE M. Alexander (5 star CB) and our defense could look completely different next year
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [88]
TigerPulse: 56%
9
|
I don't see why Adams would want to play nose tackle in a
Oct 26, 2012, 5:33 PM
|
|
3-4 defense, and he doesn't fit the bill of a 3-4 DE either IMO. Come to Clemson where you can play 4-3 DT where you belong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2841]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: I don't see why Adams would want to play nose tackle in a
Oct 26, 2012, 11:09 PM
|
|
They might want him as a 3-4 DE. He's only like 290 right now. He could stay right around 280-310 and play 3-4 DE. That's why I like him so much, he's versatile enough to play DE in our occasional 3-4 sets as well as DT in our 4-3 sets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [88]
TigerPulse: 56%
9
|
IMO his height, size, quickness off the snap, and ability to
Oct 27, 2012, 2:26 AM
|
|
penetrate & be disruptive in the backfield makes him better suited as a 4-3 DT in our scheme than a 5 technique 3-4 DE lined up over an offensive tackle. IMO, for the same reason you wouldn't play Gerald McCoy or Suh at 3-4 DE is the same reason you wouldn't do it for Adams b/c it doesn't maximize his ability & potential.
Completely agree that he's versatile enough to line up there on occasion, but I wouldn't want it to be his predominant position like it would be at Bama.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2841]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: IMO his height, size, quickness off the snap, and ability to
Oct 27, 2012, 10:56 AM
|
|
I definitely agree there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [88]
TigerPulse: 56%
9
|
.... or Bama might want to bulk him up to play NT, which he
Oct 27, 2012, 11:38 AM
|
|
would probably be outstanding at, but IMO it'd be wasting his talent, don't you agree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 2653
|
|
|
50
