|
Replies: 14
| visibility 519
|
Ring of Honor [22001]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 13952
Joined: 2005
|
Weakest group today and not surprising
1
4
Apr 15, 2023, 3:07 PM
|
|
Wide receivers. No separation. Got to get better.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1595]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: Weakest group today and not surprising
1
Apr 15, 2023, 3:09 PM
|
|
Clemson wide receivers use to be known for their speed. Also blocking has gotten much worse at the position as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1394]
TigerPulse: 84%
28
|
Re: Weakest group today and not surprising
3
Apr 15, 2023, 3:27 PM
|
|
We were never really known for speed. We had good speed, but our top receivers were all known as the best possession guys, being about 6'4" and able to win every 50/50 ball. Watkins, M. Williams, Higgins, Ross. They were all reasonably fast but were more possession guys. But we did have elite route runners who could help extend the field (Hunter, Amari). Alabama and Ohio State favored the speedsters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11589]
TigerPulse: 86%
46
Posts: 14643
Joined: 2004
|
It’s a talent issue at WR…..
1
Apr 15, 2023, 3:20 PM
|
|
Either need to bring in portal talent or start landing the “Watkins/Ross/Higgins” type on the recruiting trail
Not WRU anymore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3159]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
Re: Weakest group today and not surprising
1
Apr 15, 2023, 3:22 PM
|
|
Keep in mind we're several starters haven't played today and we're being very vanilla.
It should look better when our best players are out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6660]
TigerPulse: 96%
41
|
Outside of Beaux, what major contributor is missing today?
2
Apr 15, 2023, 3:26 PM
|
|
Not talking potential... WRs that have actually contributed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3159]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
Re: Outside of Beaux, what major contributor is missing today?
Apr 15, 2023, 3:30 PM
|
|
I was basing it mostly off of potential and new offensive scheme. A lot of the guys playing right now are walk-ons that won't get much play much when the season starts.
It's still a position I'm concerned with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [45329]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 11828
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Weakest group today and not surprising
3
Apr 15, 2023, 3:23 PM
|
|
I’m thinking our DB’s looked a little faster and more physical. Hard to say what caliber of DB’s they were up against.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6737]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Weakest group today and not surprising
2
Apr 15, 2023, 3:24 PM
|
|
Turning into years now, not games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22226]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
Re: Weakest group today and not surprising
Apr 15, 2023, 3:26 PM
|
|
Noble had his guy beat but Vizzina floated it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [25882]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 18072
Joined: 2000
|
Only 2 of 6 kickers were good***
1
Apr 15, 2023, 3:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10246]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 11375
Joined: 2003
|
And still don’t block! That’s coaching!***
Apr 15, 2023, 4:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 81%
31
|
The dbs looked good, no lie
Apr 16, 2023, 2:02 AM
|
|
Especially Barnes. Geez that guy had a game. Ut here's the thing. Our wrs make teams pass defense go up 10 spots after we play them. Everyone. Collins, since he obviously loves Clemson, I hope breaks out. I don't see it. Too much to learn too little time.
Stellato is an enigma. We just don't know. If stellato doesn't play much next year, I think he's a legitimate cut. Cuz this is about money now. It's time to give what was asked
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [8071]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
7 scholarship WR's out for Spring Game. So,
Apr 16, 2023, 8:58 AM
|
|
I am reserving judgement until we get a lot more healthy at WR and the June Freshmen get on campus. I also agree, we were very vanilla on offense.
I thought Cole Turner looked pretty sharp honestly.
We'll be alright!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [970]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: Weakest group today and not surprising
Apr 16, 2023, 11:37 AM
|
|
Coaches??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 519
|
|
|
50
