Replies: 14
| visibility 1951
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 70%
10
|
Wake or USUCK?
Nov 15, 2016, 4:50 AM
|
|
Which team do you guys see presenting the biggest challenge for us? Think the betting lines will be about the same?
|
|
|
 |
Dynasty Maker [3438]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Wake or USUCK?
Nov 15, 2016, 5:29 AM
|
|
Wake. They have a pretty good defense.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Pro [781]
TigerPulse: 93%
22
|
Re: Wake or USUCK?
Nov 15, 2016, 5:55 AM
|
|
Neither. Wake we'll beat 82-14 and usuk 64-16.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7219]
TigerPulse: 70%
42
Posts: 20390
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Wake or USUCK?
Nov 15, 2016, 6:20 AM
|
|
What makes you think we will put 82 against Wake? Louisville only put up 44. And we were only 2 points better than them.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet HOFer [134075]
TigerPulse: 100%
66
Posts: 59843
Joined: 2009
|
We beat Louville by 6***
Nov 15, 2016, 6:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [39410]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 33533
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Wake or USUCK?
Nov 12, 2018, 8:01 PM
|
|
Wake Forest is a better team overall right now than the Dirtpeckers, and they don't want to hear it but it's the truth . The difference is that we are playing Wake away ...which is a tougher deal for anybody .
I think the team refocuses and gets all over both of them from both sides of the football . We beat Wake 30-10 and we destroy the Coots 45-13 .
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [69946]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 41655
Joined: 2001
|
We don't turnover the ball as much on the road.
Nov 15, 2016, 11:34 AM
|
|
Turnovers at home against the coots should be a concern.
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [7219]
TigerPulse: 70%
42
Posts: 20390
Joined: 2006
|
Re: Wake or USUCK?
Nov 15, 2016, 6:17 AM
|
|
The biggest challenge is us.Sloppy play,lack of a run game,turnovers, poor play calling,stupid penalties,lack of a killer instinct,thinking we are better than we are, letting teams that we should beat hang around. Is there anything I'm missing? And the last time I checked a betting line never won a freaking football game.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27753]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 32032
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Wake or USUCK?
Nov 15, 2016, 6:20 AM
|
|
You left off playing at night! As much as we like the later games, CLEMSON wins practically ALL early kickoffs! When was the last nooner that we lost?
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [238]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Wake. USuCk's one of those secLeast teams.***
Nov 15, 2016, 6:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Titan [49905]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 30364
Joined: 1998
|
Wake, for a few reasons ...
Nov 15, 2016, 6:48 AM
|
|
1. Obviously, they're next. 2. On the road 3. after a loss 4. Very good defense 5. The Deac's bad-a$$ Harley 6. There is no No. 6 7. They ain't Capons 8. Night game in W-S are traditionally life-sucker for our team ... I still have nightmares about 2003. 9. I refuse to think that the Capons will be a concern for anyone not named Massachusetts. 10. Your thoughts welcome...
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17597]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 15437
Joined: 1999
|
Wake
Nov 15, 2016, 6:54 AM
|
|
On the road and more at stake. Plus...Coots suck.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-Time Great [88625]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 81651
Joined: 1999
|
Wake only because on road.***
Nov 15, 2016, 7:24 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [6028]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Wake
Nov 15, 2016, 9:41 AM
|
|
South Carolina plays in the SEC East, enough said.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4931]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Wake or USUCK?
Nov 15, 2016, 10:42 AM
|
|
Wake. Looking at this weekend's odds show us favored over Wake -22.5 but the Coot's game has no line on the boards.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1951
|
|
|