|
Replies: 14
| visibility 102
|
Commissioner [1234]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Where does this snub rank historically?
Mar 12, 2023, 11:25 PM
|
|
... and where does it rank among ACC schools who didn't get in years past?
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8357]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Where does this snub rank historically?
1
Mar 12, 2023, 11:25 PM
|
|
It doesn’t rank anywhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6201]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Where does this snub rank historically?
Mar 13, 2023, 12:26 AM
|
|
65 th
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [80005]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 29581
Joined: 2018
|
Reach.
1
Mar 12, 2023, 11:27 PM
|
|
It's chit and chit stinks though chit is chit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [50733]
TigerPulse: 79%
58
Posts: 37014
Joined: 2003
|
Have there ever been any third place ACC teams left out of the NCAA Tournament?
1
1
Mar 12, 2023, 11:29 PM
|
|
I certainly can’t remember any.
It’s a huge snub regardless. I’m livid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [132]
TigerPulse: 82%
11
|
Re: Have there ever been any third place ACC teams left out of the NCAA Tournament?
1
2
Mar 12, 2023, 11:30 PM
|
|
First time since 2000 that the third place ACC team has been left out
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [50733]
TigerPulse: 79%
58
Posts: 37014
Joined: 2003
|
Thanks, I forgot about that.
1
Mar 12, 2023, 11:34 PM
|
|
Virginia was 19-12 overall, 9-7 in the ACC that year.
I can see why they didn’t make it, compared to our 23-10 and 14-6 this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8357]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [132]
TigerPulse: 82%
11
|
Re: Have there ever been any third place ACC teams left out of the NCAA Tournament?
Mar 12, 2023, 11:32 PM
|
|
Well that’s pretty specific but I’m guessing no
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8357]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Have there ever been any third place ACC teams left out of the NCAA Tournament?
1
Mar 12, 2023, 11:34 PM
|
|
It’s specifically accurate and extremely relevant to why we did not get a bid. “3rd in ACC” is like the Coots chanting “SEC SEC”. It doesn’t matter one bit when you look at the whole picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31547]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 36948
Joined: 2000
|
To be fair those are not the same thing
1
Mar 12, 2023, 11:39 PM
|
|
I'm not arguing that there weren't valid reasons we didnt make it in...
But, the gamecocks chanting SEC are doing so in a league they didn't perform well in... that is NOT the situation here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1122]
TigerPulse: 83%
26
|
For the ACC it’s an all time embarrassment
Mar 12, 2023, 11:30 PM
|
|
They’re now a lesser conference in basketball than the Mountain West. With Wake not getting in with their record last year, and now Clemson and UNC missing this year, the conference isn’t even a top Mid-Major conference, in basketball. That’s troubling, and does not bode well for a conference that’s already considered a sinking ship in football.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3686]
TigerPulse: 85%
35
|
Re: For the ACC it’s an all time embarrassment
1
Mar 12, 2023, 11:35 PM
|
|
What's troubling is the ranking system that is used to determine that. The ACC would destroy the mountain west in a matchup style similar to the ACC Big 10 challenge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [50733]
TigerPulse: 79%
58
Posts: 37014
Joined: 2003
|
You’re being really dramatic.
Mar 12, 2023, 11:46 PM
[ in reply to For the ACC it’s an all time embarrassment ] |
|
The ACC’s 5 teams in the NCAA Tournament ranked fourth this year.
Big 10 - 8 teams
SEC - 8 teams
Big XII - 7 teams
ACC - 5 teams
PAC-12 - 4 teams
The Mountain West, which you said is better, had 4 teams.
Which mid-major conferences had better than 5?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11369]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Where does this snub rank historically?
1
Mar 12, 2023, 11:36 PM
|
|
It’s not a snub, we put ourselves in this position by no winning the games we should undoubtedly win. Beat historically bad Louisville and USuck and we are easily in, we have no one to blame but ourselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 102
|
|
|
50
