|
Replies: 32
| visibility 4829
|
All-In [10636]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Eternal Icon [178214]
TigerPulse: 100%
70
Posts: 29443
Joined: 2012
|
I wish we wouldn't give away all of our secrets***
8
8
Apr 1, 2024, 1:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10636]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Might as well publish it in a book
5
5
Apr 1, 2024, 1:53 PM
|
|
or even make a movie about it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27586]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 18498
Joined: 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2284]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [86082]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 21280
Joined: 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5070]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Just like telling the Russians what weapons we sent to the Ukraine
1
Apr 2, 2024, 12:57 PM
|
|
Because they know that we have so many spies in our forces nothing is ever going to be a secret!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6438]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: New Navy Submarine
3
Apr 1, 2024, 1:58 PM
|
|
I'd sure like to know how water can be accelerated with only magnetism and no moving parts..... Sounds like there's some unobtanium involved.... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7778]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 16326
Joined: 2002
|
lol we don't want the Russian navy to observe so we're going to do it here.
3
Apr 1, 2024, 2:04 PM
|
|
Seems like we're far too forthcoming unless there's some sort of tactical reason for it that we'll never be privy to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6438]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: lol we don't want the Russian navy to observe so we're going to do it here.
1
Apr 1, 2024, 2:11 PM
|
|
Maybe we're trying to tie up the Russians and Chinese and cause them to waste their best brainpower on something that maybe can't be done. When Top Gun "Maverick" was released, I read that the Chinese went nuts trying to figure out if we really had that Mach 10 airplane in production. Maybe they'll fall for this, too.
I say maybe because DARPA has done some crazy things.
But like others here, I don't see why we would advertise it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7778]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 16326
Joined: 2002
|
Something like that would be the only reason I see to release it.***
1
Apr 1, 2024, 2:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10252]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [23]
TigerPulse: 100%
3
|
Re: lol we don't want the Russian navy to observe so we're going to do it here.
1
Apr 1, 2024, 2:24 PM
[ in reply to lol we don't want the Russian navy to observe so we're going to do it here. ] |
|
The concept has been around for about 70 years and is nothing new. It was the basis of the Red October in Tom Clancy's The Hunt for Red October published about 1986. The technology to implement it where the limitations on its use has been.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7778]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 16326
Joined: 2002
|
I generally assume that what's released to the public
1
Apr 1, 2024, 2:27 PM
|
|
Something that everyone in classified circles already knows about, or it's a slight of hand for enemies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13640
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6438]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13640
Joined: 2007
|
It's too bad the testing won't be open to the public
3
Apr 1, 2024, 2:22 PM
|
|
I would like to have seen the USS Montana.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13640
Joined: 2007
|
It's too bad the testing won't be open to the public
1
Apr 1, 2024, 2:22 PM
|
|
I would like to have seen the USS Montana.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27586]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 18498
Joined: 2024
|
Re: New Navy Submarine
1
Apr 1, 2024, 2:27 PM
|
|
Interesting. The link doesn't work anymore. Hmmm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13640
Joined: 2007
|
Re: New Navy Submarine
2
Apr 1, 2024, 2:31 PM
|
|
Try reloading the page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27586]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 18498
Joined: 2024
|
Re: New Navy Submarine
1
Apr 1, 2024, 2:33 PM
|
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12526]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 14830
Joined: 2014
|
Re: New Navy Submarine
1
Apr 1, 2024, 2:41 PM
|
|
A stealth sub. Super! I just can't stand stealth politicians.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [82167]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 44612
Joined: 2004
|
april 1.***
2
Apr 1, 2024, 2:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [55413]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44254
Joined: 2004
|
1 ping, 1 ping only.***
1
3
Apr 1, 2024, 3:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2884]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: New Navy Submarine
Apr 1, 2024, 10:33 PM
|
|
I retired in 2008 with 23 years of submarine duty. These new designs don’t always work. We had something similar on an Ohio class about 24 years ago. Well it pretty much welded the submarine to the pier for about 4 years. They had to remove it and go back to the original design. So I don’t give much credit to these reports. Granted that was years ago but when something works why change it. RMCS(SS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10247]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: New Navy Submarine
Apr 1, 2024, 10:46 PM
|
|
Wow! Wonder which member of the LGTBQIAGHFSMD+ Navy will captain it?!
I bet our enemies are quaking in their boots 😂 just kidding, they don't take us serious as evidenced with war breaking out all over the world
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5377]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: New Navy Submarine
Apr 1, 2024, 10:49 PM
|
|
OPSEC is dead these days.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24158]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 13640
Joined: 2007
|
Re: New Navy Submarine
1
Apr 2, 2024, 8:57 AM
|
|
It's a joke. The article is just a bunch of references to The Hunt for Red October. The Penobscot River in Maine is where they take the sub to hide from the Soviets in the movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10636]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
I think 3 of y'all got it
Apr 2, 2024, 12:07 PM
|
|
Took me until about 2/3 through the article to figure it out!
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7778]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 16326
Joined: 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5643]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
Posts: 11982
Joined: 2002
|
I would have liked to have seen Montana !***
Apr 2, 2024, 1:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [43]
TigerPulse: 100%
5
|
Re: New Navy Submarine***
Apr 2, 2024, 3:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [43]
TigerPulse: 100%
5
|
Re: New Navy Submarine
Apr 2, 2024, 3:43 PM
|
|
Wasn’t that the propulsion system Sean Connery’s submarine had in Hunt for Red October?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 32
| visibility 4829
|
|
|
50
