"Election insecurity" is the necessary claim of a loser

Nov 27, 2023, 1:01 PM

American elections are secure. Period. Perfect? No. But they are PROVEN secure, especially 2020, through multiple audits. There is a process to ensure they were legitimate.

Those who can look at an issue without bias will remember Trump claiming well before November of 2020 that if he lost, he wouldn't accept the results. He said this multiple times. He claimed a rigged election.

And he did the same thing before the 2016 election. But since he won, he claimed it was legitimate that time.

Let's analyze those statements. Trump said--TWICE--he wouldn't accept the election results if he lost. But he would gladly call them legitimate if he won. You have be at the height of imbecility to believe that's how it works.

But you don't. Neither did Trump. Because he's a loser--and if you're pounding the election drum, you are as well.

Imagine sitting down to play a game of chess with a friend who says if you win, he's going to claim you cheated and it won't count. But if he wins, it's legit. And putting aside the comical idea of a Trumpie being smart enough to understand chess, we know WHY this friends would make this claim: He knows he's going to lose.

He's already realized he's a loser.

Trump and his people knew, based on polling, that the majority of American people hated him. He didn't expect to win in 2016 and barely did in a major upset. So they had to take the loser's argument: If he doesn't win, the other side cheated!

And the losers here repeat that claim despite the many, many audits and investigations that proved it false. Or how they didn't call foul when a Republican won in those same states. Or how those who pushed the Lie have already been outted for knowing it's a lie.

Why do they do this? Because admitting otherwise is admitting your movement wasn't embraced by Americans. The people rejected your wannabe dictator. You can't put an authoritarian into power--and keep him there--with legitimate elections. It's admitting out loud that you're a loser, so taking the other argument--that you were somehow cheated--is a necessary argument for your own fragile existence.

Trump knows he's a loser. Murph knows it. Keowee knows it. All of them who claim it know it.

Y'all are Gamecock fans after Rod Gardner made The Catch II.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/its-official-election-was-secure

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny

"Election insecurity" is the necessary claim of a loser

Pubs have gone from mocking Hillary for saying Russia cost her the

Crazy how that worked

Plus who needs elected office when you can make a mint protesting the

Re: Plus who needs elected office when you can make a mint protesting the

Flynn is a living, walking log of human feces.

A fool and his money are easily separated.***

Re: Crazy how that worked

OIC. The "We didn't invent the chicken,

It's certainly not a new trait, and MAGA certainly didn't invent it

Stacey Abrams is the baseline.

Whatabout***

That's a lot of words to basically say

Jay's a far better arguer than I.***

Re: That's a lot of words to basically say

Nope.

But he sold the most hats***

And the rallies and parades!!! ***

Your insecurity is showing

Why would I be scared of idiots filling a venue?

Well, four years of 3am tweetstorms is something we all miss terribly.

You misspelled

Re: You misspelled

Hes the only president with Chinese bank accounts***

US elections are a joke. The Dem machine in densely populated areas

I googled circle jerk and it took me to this thread***

I'd figure you'd have those pages bookmarked by now.***

He did.... "Cata", "hey, hey", "Chuckie15", et al... all the fake conservatives.***

TigerBoard POTD