|
Replies: 34
| visibility 1
|
All-TigerNet [12536]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 12246
Joined: 11/21/11
|
Thanks Barker, we're in a conference with
Nov 28, 2012, 9:54 AM
|
|
Pitt, Louisville, Boston College etc..
While SC is in the SEC
Good luck recruiting Dabo. We're going to need it.
Louisville????
I'd have to say Clemson is among the big losers of all this realignment. Just nowhere for us to go due to the craze of wanting new states with tv markets.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Thanks Barker, we're in a conference with
Nov 28, 2012, 9:57 AM
|
|
lol Louisville is better than Maryland in nearly every sport right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [61576]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39585
Joined: 12/16/01
|
And, better than the rumored Navy.***
Nov 28, 2012, 10:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14921]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12314
Joined: 3/28/06
|
I stubbed my toe this morning. Thanks a lot Barker.***
Nov 28, 2012, 9:59 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2245]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2743
Joined: 1/26/12
|
Re: Thanks Barker, we're in a conference with
Nov 28, 2012, 9:59 AM
|
|
Bunk! Barker got nothing to do with coots in SEC nor with SEC inviting Clemson to join! And sure hope Syracuse, Pitt and Louisville are cup cakes as you imply, but I would buckle my chinstrap for those games!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12536]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 12246
Joined: 11/21/11
|
It doesn't matter if chinstrap needs to be buckled. Are you
Nov 28, 2012, 10:02 AM
|
|
really ok with being in a conference with Pitt and Louisville. We are the ne Big East.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6937]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 22594
Joined: 5/4/03
|
Re: You must live one miserable life.***
Nov 28, 2012, 10:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12536]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 12246
Joined: 11/21/11
|
Actually, I was thinking the same thing about you pricknut****
Nov 28, 2012, 11:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Actually, I was thinking the same thing about you pricknut****
Nov 28, 2012, 11:06 AM
|
|
You sir are a moron.... That is all.
Seriously UConn or Navy over Louisville!?!?! Ill have what you are smoking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4504]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9112
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 22%
Posts: 563
Joined: 1/11/12
|
Re: Seeing all your anti-Louisville posts. Did you maybe get
Nov 28, 2012, 12:10 PM
|
|
Louisville doesn't turn anyone down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8681]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8888
Joined: 10/19/11
|
Who else is the ACC supposed to add
Nov 28, 2012, 10:00 AM
|
|
ECU, UCF, MTSU?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12536]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 12246
Joined: 11/21/11
|
Connecticut, or how about nobody if there is not an
Nov 28, 2012, 10:02 AM
|
|
acceptable school to take.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Connecticut, or how about nobody if there is not an
Nov 28, 2012, 10:30 AM
|
|
UConn? Really UConn is worse than UL in pretty much all sports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1838]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 6249
Joined: 12/17/06
|
They beat the Coots since Tigers have. Course that was with
Nov 28, 2012, 10:33 AM
|
|
Edsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: They beat the Coots since Tigers have. Course that was with
Nov 28, 2012, 11:06 AM
|
|
### does that have to do with anything?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1838]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 6249
Joined: 12/17/06
|
they are no Wake or UVA***
Nov 28, 2012, 12:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: they are no Wake or UVA***
Nov 28, 2012, 12:27 PM
|
|
You are correct Wake played UConn in 2006 and 2007.
Beat them both games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1838]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 6249
Joined: 12/17/06
|
didn't Wake win the ACC that year.***
Nov 28, 2012, 12:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16121]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26428
Joined: 11/18/03
|
We beat em...***
Nov 28, 2012, 12:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16121]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26428
Joined: 11/18/03
|
They certainly never went from #8 to 4 and 8...Thats about
Nov 28, 2012, 12:28 PM
[ in reply to they are no Wake or UVA*** ] |
|
as low as it goes...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1838]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 6249
Joined: 12/17/06
|
they did go from BCS to 5-7 though***
Nov 28, 2012, 12:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16121]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26428
Joined: 11/18/03
|
Were they #8? Did they lose 8 games? Still not as bad as
Nov 28, 2012, 12:33 PM
|
|
Arky...Get used to it, you will read it alot...#8 to 4 and 8...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [390]
TigerPulse: 71%
Posts: 1455
Joined: 8/9/02
|
Isn't that the point?
Nov 28, 2012, 10:15 AM
[ in reply to Who else is the ACC supposed to add ] |
|
Isn't the point that the viable ACC targets are lower tier schools, while the most valuable properties of the ACC are the targets for the other conferences.
Swoffed again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [70]
TigerPulse: 72%
Posts: 78
Joined: 12/3/07
|
Re: Thanks Barker, we're in a conference with
Nov 28, 2012, 10:01 AM
|
|
really? What other options did the ACC have? UL was by far the best move.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6937]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 22594
Joined: 5/4/03
|
Re:Great summation there. Barker is responsible for
Nov 28, 2012, 10:03 AM
|
|
tv markets. I was unaware that he had much to do with that or the population
of the Carolinas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1838]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 6249
Joined: 12/17/06
|
how did the last two Big East games go***
Nov 28, 2012, 10:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: how did the last two Big East games go***
Nov 28, 2012, 10:21 AM
|
|
WT F different does that make?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1838]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 6249
Joined: 12/17/06
|
All these peeps putting down a conference that if I remember
Nov 28, 2012, 10:27 AM
|
|
Correctly, their co-champion and a third place finisher beat them. Getting all high and mighty when as ACC Champion finished behind the BE, Conf USAa, and Mountain West champ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [158]
TigerPulse: 58%
Posts: 729
Joined: 10/11/10
|
Louisville sells Beer at their game, but....
Nov 28, 2012, 10:05 AM
|
|
...that may change if the ACC doesn't allow it. the Louisville community have embraced the Cardinals because it's like a pro game w/ beer. take away the beer, and you'll lose 20% of the fans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1321]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2316
Joined: 10/5/00
|
Not arguing here...
Nov 28, 2012, 10:06 AM
|
|
but I thought the no beer thing was an NCAA rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [158]
TigerPulse: 58%
Posts: 729
Joined: 10/11/10
|
no, because Pac 10 schools sell beer too.
Nov 28, 2012, 10:11 AM
|
|
the NCAA just controls their sponsored events like the Basketball Tournament. Bowls get to sell beer. But Conferences may prohibit beer at the Conference Championship (i.e. SEC Championship doesn't sell beer but the Chic-Fil-A Bowl does)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1321]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2316
Joined: 10/5/00
|
OK. Didn't know that. *******
Nov 28, 2012, 10:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [9050]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 13813
Joined: 7/1/02
|
Yes, as a football school we're getting squeezed out.....
Nov 28, 2012, 10:17 AM
|
|
with the addition of the latest group of schools to the ACC.
If we want to be a national football power then being in the ACC is getting harder and harder to enable that to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Not arguing here...
Nov 28, 2012, 11:15 AM
|
|
Its a conference thing. The ACC has a "section" rule.
If a stadium has secure boxes and club seating (like the glass enclosed sections and the WestEndZone club we have) then you can bring in alcohol before they open the gates.
I.e. friday night or early that morning you can go into your private box and leave a case of beer in there. But you arent supposed to bring it in when everyone else is entering, or leave during the game an bring any in.
If you're in the stands like everyone else, you aren't supposed to have it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 34
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
