Replies: 15
| visibility 52
|
Top TigerNet [30697]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 23151
Joined: 2002
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8139]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10466
Joined: 2013
|
If a law merely reduces gun deaths but not all of them, why
3
May 16, 2023, 8:53 PM
|
|
even bother?
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17238]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18086
Joined: 2015
|
Re: If a law merely reduces gun deaths but not all of them, why
May 16, 2023, 9:23 PM
|
|
ARs were around long before weekly mass shootings. Do libs ever “root cause analysis”?
|
|
|
|
 |
Associate AD [831]
TigerPulse: 94%
23
|
Re: If a law merely reduces gun deaths but not all of them, why
May 16, 2023, 9:29 PM
|
|
Do you ever look at what guns are used?
100% Republiturd logic is that if you can't stop all of them you might as well not try to stop any of them.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17238]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18086
Joined: 2015
|
Re: If a law merely reduces gun deaths but not all of them, why
2
May 16, 2023, 9:46 PM
|
|
Wasn’t that your argument against building a wall? “Wont stop all from getting in…der…herrr”.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27824]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48313
Joined: 2010
|
Forget it, man... You can't fix stupid. I'd gladly give them
May 17, 2023, 9:57 PM
|
|
my keys, then gladly blow their heads off.
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [817]
TigerPulse: 58%
23
|
Re: If a law merely reduces gun deaths but not all of them, why
May 16, 2023, 9:41 PM
[ in reply to Re: If a law merely reduces gun deaths but not all of them, why ] |
|
Very few people owned AR's before mass shootings. That's actually what increased their popularity.
in the early 80s, I knew exactly one person with an AR, and he was a veteran of two combat tours and a state trooper. There were something like 15,000 AR or AR clones in the US in 88 or 89. After the first mass shooting with one, the sales took off and there are millions now. All the idiots had to buy one.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17238]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18086
Joined: 2015
|
Re: If a law merely reduces gun deaths but not all of them, why
May 16, 2023, 9:55 PM
|
|
Gd, there is so much wrong is this fkn post; go back under that rock.
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [817]
TigerPulse: 58%
23
|
Re: If a law merely reduces gun deaths but not all of them, why
May 17, 2023, 9:41 PM
|
|
You must be one of those idiots. And one who is too young, or too addled from eating paint chips, to remember what things were like before all the nuts had to buy an assault rifle.
####, this world is too full of morons.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27824]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48313
Joined: 2010
|
First off, if I had any inclination toward mass shooting,
May 17, 2023, 10:02 PM
|
|
it would be with a magazined semi-auto shotgun... SO much more damage. I'm sane, tho...
It's not the weapon, it's the shooter.
As to most of the street crime which is most of the murders, it's being done with handguns, not ARs...
Understand, "moron"...?
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8139]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10466
Joined: 2013
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17238]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 18086
Joined: 2015
|
Shure iz
May 16, 2023, 9:54 PM
|
|
“Of the 13,650 gun-related homicides in 2020, nearly 60% of them involved a handgun”
|
|
|
|
 |
Hall of Famer [8139]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10466
Joined: 2013
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [817]
TigerPulse: 58%
23
|
Re: Shure iz
May 17, 2023, 9:43 PM
[ in reply to Shure iz ] |
|
So you are saying if we ban long guns, 40% of gun-related homicides won't happen? Got it, dummy.
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [32513]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 19197
Joined: 2000
|
Re: Maff is hard
May 17, 2023, 10:03 PM
[ in reply to Maff is hard ] |
|
Your comparing completely DIFFERENT DECADES.... Apples vs Oranges!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27824]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 48313
Joined: 2010
|
Biden Laws Matter.***
May 17, 2023, 10:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 52
|
|
|